Why is this still going? Are people really still buying this

>>87169682
Because Bendis likes her for some reason. Which is why her mantle hasn't been taken up by a minority recently. Although considering Kamala, it would be better.

>>87169682
When will she get her old costume back?

>>87169682
They decided to only cancel good books.

File: 14766241228594.jpg (678KB, 1226x1216px) Image search: [Google]

678KB, 1226x1216px

>>87169682
I was actually debating on starting this. I loved the Ultimate version, but I heard the 616 Jessica is boring in comparison.
Is either Vol 5/6 worth checking out?

>>87170052
>that Photoshop in the window

Holy lol

File: 1473887325212.jpg (360KB, 958x720px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 958x720px

>>87169682
>Are people really still buying this book?
Not really, no.

11/14 Spider-Woman #1 - 93,723 (Spider-Verse)
12/14 Spider-Woman #2 - 44,618 ( -52.4%)(Spider-Verse)
01/15 Spider-Woman #3 - 38,484 (-13.8%) (spider-Verse)
02/15 Spider-Woman #4 - 36,058 (- 6.3%)
03/15 Spider-Woman #5 - 40,068 (+11.1%)
04/15 Spider-Woman #6 - 32,041 (-20.0%)
05/15 Spider-Woman #7 - 29,567 (- 7.3%)
06/15 Spider-Woman #8 - 26,568 (-10.1%)
07/15 Spider-Woman #9 - 24,354 (- 8.3%)
08/15 Spider-Woman #10- 23,005 (- 5.5%)
09/15 ---
10/15 ---
11/15 Spider-Woman #1 - 53,885
12/15 Spider-Woman #2 - 27,801 (-48.4%)
01/16 Spider-Woman #3 - 24,054 (-13.5%)
02/16 Spider-Woman #4 - 20,747 (-13.7%)
03/16 Spider-Woman #5 - 20,594 ( - 0.7%)
04/16 Spider-Woman #6 - 39,291 (+90.8%) (Spider-Women)
05/16 Spider-Woman #7 - 27,118 (-31.0%) (Spider-Women)
06/16 Spider-Woman #8 - 19,658 (-27.5%)
07/16 Spider-Woman #9 - 20,938 (+6.5%) (CV 2)
08/16 Spider-Woman #10- 19,251 (- 8.1%) (CV 2)
09/16 Spider-Woman #11- 17,743 (- 7.8%) (CV 2)

>>87170284
I feel incredibly vindicated

>>87170119
>tfw it's actually in the original issue
Talk about lazyness

>>87169682
Can they take Hopeless out of Jess' ass? He's no worse than Kate Leth and Cain putting themselves in their books.

>>87170052
No. Her original run is.

File: f4883472ba3d574.jpg (66KB, 564x797px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 564x797px

Why anyone bother reading Spider-Woman when these two exist?
She's lackluster in comparison.

>>87169682
Some people like stuff you don't like.
Deal with it?

File: 1473893950544.jpg (156KB, 544x666px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 544x666px

>>87171408
sure anon, the sales are reflecting that

File: 1467835266721.jpg (234KB, 881x1425px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 881x1425px

>>87170284
Pregnancy didn't work, it's time for Lesbians.

I like and have always liked jess and I'm not even buying this book

>>87170607
Didn't he made Jess pregnant because his wife gave birth and he wants to share to the readers how it's like having a child?

>>87171667
Then it's simple numbers, not enough people like it. Still, let those who enjoy it, enjoy it until it's gone?
How does that trigger you? People liking stuff you don't like?

>>87172070
>How does that trigger you?
It doesn't they could be using those resources, for something more worthwhile though

File: 1476632982722.jpg (322KB, 800x1317px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 800x1317px

>>87171713
They need another character design/
If women aren't buying it then they need to revert back to giving it appeal for men.

File: 53021737_p1_master1200.jpg (925KB, 826x1200px) Image search: [Google]

925KB, 826x1200px

>>87170480
Wouldn't be the first, nor last time.
I saw some panels, I think it was from from Iron Girl, it was quite literally SMF models posed, screenshotted and filtered over.
I'm talking lazier looking than pic related

>>87172229
I think they like what they're doing.
They're not wasting their time making comics in order to annoy people - they're making them because they want to make them.

As for worthwhile, surely that's a matter of taste?

>>87169682
what i hate most about her outfit are the glasses