How did they get away with constantly sexualizing prepubescent

what's the big deal with sexualizing cartoon children?
No one ever would become a real pedo going for real children after watching these.

it make my peepee HARD

>>86687835
Chipmunks live an average of 3 years. If they're mutant Siberian Chipmunks and away from the survival threats of the wild, they might live 10-15 years.

Brittany there is middle-aged, and her bio-clock is ticking.

File: snapshot00475.png (941KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

941KB, 720x540px

>>86687835
i dont know, but sure i love these girls.

>>86687835

the girls aren't being sexy, they're just dancing like the current popular music artists of their time, which happens to be sexy.

Girls just want to have fun

>>86687835
youre The pedo for seeing it Sexy

File: do the monkey.webm (410KB, 1220x380px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1220x380px

Because they're rockstars.

>>86688493
But you're seeing it sexy.

Only that one scene was in any way sexy. You know the one.

They're supposed to be cute and sassy.

>>86688749
Dont flip this on me. I'm not seeing it sexy. OP is. I never looked at the chipmunks that way.

File: chippet.jpg (16KB, 490x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 490x360px

>>86689154

File: Jeanette and Eleanor dance.webm (363KB, 1096x510px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1096x510px

>>86688447
dancing and showing their panties.

>>86687835
>>86688447
>>86689468
It's supposed to be realistic. Little girls are whores.

>>86687835

>How did they get away with constantly sexualizing prepubescent rodents?

Simple: Everyone involved with the production of this film was a pedophile.

File: s03e08 - The Chipette Story.mp4_snapshot_01.03.jpg (24KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 480x360px

they are cute in these outfits.

File: baboons and man howling.jpg (33KB, 587x347px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 587x347px

>>86687835
Several answers, but among them "Times were different back then, this was pre-Political Correctness that became cancer in the 90s." Also, this is non-mainstream animation (not Warner or Disney). It's from Bagdasarian. Lastly, technically the Chipmunks and Chipettes age is never firmly defined. Their cartoon series ranged from being nearly in kindergarten to being in late high school, depending on what the episode wanted.

Regardless, times were good back then.

The way they're portrayed is definitely unusual, but it's subtle enough that you look like a weirdo if you mention it to a normie

Maybe the laid off Disney guys had a lot of pent up perversion built up after working on such squeaky-clean films for so long , and were taking advantage of being less micromanaged

>>86688344
Does Jeanette have any upskirt pics?

Anyone that doubts the chipettes were sexualized should take a look at the model sheets

File: Jeanette.png (631KB, 600x549px)

631KB, 600x549px

>>86690184
yes, in this movie.

>>86689575
que?

>>86687962
Keep your winky in your pants.

File: 1402850288502.png (1MB, 745x606px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 745x606px

>>86690184

>>86690647
>>86687962

>winky
>peepee

What are you, 12? (If you are, be careful, this is a pedo bait thread.)

>>86690689
>12
Those are words that 5 year olds and deranged 40+ year old pedophiles would use.

>>86690272
Why don't you post them then?

File: 1394754939475.gif (122KB, 1280x843px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1280x843px

>>86690272
I don't see it.

>>86687835

its no different in the modern live action movies either

>>86691075
DanSchneider.jpg

Just be thankful its not european

>>86691611
Europe is a mistake.

File: 1449300011360.gif (3MB, 320x232px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x232px

You wouldn't rape a chipmunk, would you?

>>86692299
I would all 3.

>>86687835
>redents

File: derpf.jpg (34KB, 434x378px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 434x378px

>>86687835
>cartoon characters can't be sassy without pedo neckbeards wanting to fuck them

File: 1426230151547.jpg (1MB, 2500x1844px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2500x1844px

>>86694080
It's one of the immutable laws of the universe.

>>86692299

me? no

A drunk Dave? probably

>>86689575
Hello, police?

>>86690827
>that bottom one
NOT SEXUALISED AT ALL

File: Jeanette-sploosh247.jpg (58KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 512x384px

Would you a mermaid Jeanette?

>>86687835
Because they were obnoxious and had really annoying voices, clearly their presence was a gimmick to attract young girl demographic.
Nobody can convince me heterosexual boys watched them as children and were genuinely attracted to them and not repulsed.

Well you see, this was back before weeaboos started jerking to panty shots and thinking it was hard core pornography.

>>86687835
Well maybe if these cartoon lolis weren't so fucking hot, everyone wouldn't be having the hots for them right now.

File: Fujiko.jpg (57KB, 702x641px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 702x641px

>>86696511
No it wasn't, you faggot. Fanservice dates back to even the most refined old animu.

File: 74567.jpg (318KB, 701x678px) Image search: [Google]

318KB, 701x678px

why are the chipettes so lewd?

>>86696260
>Little Chipmunk Girl with Boobs

>>86688609

The Chippettes in this movie have always made me uncomfortable. I don't think it happens for any other movie than this one.

These "chipmunks" have no animal features besides the nose.

File: 67847848.gif (1021KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

1021KB, 500x375px

>>86687835
>>86688609
>>86689468
>>86692299
I keep forgetting how the animation in this movie is just awesome

File: Alvin angels.png (979KB, 928x706px) Image search: [Google]

979KB, 928x706px

>>86697941
why are pratically teenagers in little body.

File: 14649333219215.webm (352KB, 900x506px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 900x506px

>>86687962
Bad anon.