Why does this channel suck so bad nowadays

File: 1474263193744.png (56KB, 491x585px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 491x585px

>>86552447
Company Wars thread? Sure.

Nick managed to make it's old shows recover, and give us new good shows. CN keeps making their old shows shitty with sub-par modern versions, their modern long runners have been pretty meh for a long time, and the new stuff looks entirely unappealing.

>>86552484
The only good new shows are The Loud House and Harvey Beaks everything else like Sanjay and Craig and Breadwinners

Because they keep making shitty shows like Pig Goat Banana Cricket and Modern Fairly OddParents

>>86553004
Sanjay and Craig was not the best, but ok

>>86553047
PGBC was also fine.

File: The_Adventures_of_Pete_&_Pete_Title_card[1].jpg (55KB, 320x234px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 320x234px

Instead of making good shows like pete and pete, salute your shorts, and hey dude. They tried to copy disney and Ashley Nebraska.

>>86553345
I miss the days of Nick shows that didn't depend on copying Disney Tween Sitcoms. Ned's Declassified was the closest we got to that and it was pretty decent.

>>86552484
>>86552447
Both are better than disney channel

>>86553539
Tru Jackson was also actually really good

>>86553345
this makes me remember that Nick is unique in that whatever time of the channel you think of as the best, there's a group that think it's shit and replaced the best time

File: beautiful sandwich waifu.png (515KB, 600x771px) Image search: [Google]

515KB, 600x771px

This thread needs more best girl

>>86552447
The last time I looked at Nickelodeon on TV, it was airing nothing but Spongebob and iCarly, no exaggeration.

>>86553539
Ned's Declassified was a solid program. It was basically Scrubs for kids.

>>86554950
That was at least 4 years ago

>>86552447

1) Cancerous pandering to new age children and their smartphones

2) Trying too hard with some shows (pushing shows literally no one likes)

3) Cancelling most good shows before they even have a chance to shine

4) They take literally 0 risks. Everything is a carbon copy of another network's show or a show that plays itself too safe.

>>86552447
Because you're not 7 anymore.

>>86553539
>I miss the days of Nick shows that didn't depend on copying Disney Tween Sitcoms.
Right, because Clarissa Explains it All wasn't on all the fucking time in early 90s.

>>86555008
Yes, it was. Sanjay and Craig gave me no hope for its future and I can't be assed to bother paying for TV now. We as a society have evolved beyond a need for it.

>>86555151
There were no Disney Tween Sitcoms to copy in the early 90's, you fuckwit. Clarissa was original.

>>86555151
Clarissa was just a standard sitcom centered around a teenage girl. It could have been on any of the big 4 US networks and done just as well.

Disney tween sitcoms and their clones, all depend on some outrageous premise. Like being a secret pop idol or having popular podcast show.

>>86552484
>keeps

Name one other instance other than power puff girls.

Samurai Jack doesn't count, we don't know how that's gonna be yet; but we assume amazing

>>86555272
Not the same anon, but I'm guessing Teen Titans Go.

They don't advertise or air their new shows and dump/cancel them

>>86555272
Ben 10

>>86552484
The only objectively awful CN shows are PPG, TTG, and Ben 10. And honestly in a year one of those three is definately going to get phased out.

>>86557629
Id say the only objectively awful show on Nick are the liva action shit and Breadwinners. And Breadwinners already for canceled

>>86557805
Whoops. Forgot to remove the name.

That should come off on its own, I always forget

https://vine.co/v/5Oq9E51dBLF THIS