do you prefer team books or solo books?

Solos are less to be bullshit

Less

Team books.

>>86345256
depends

usually solos

>>86345256
But "Solo"s book hasn't come out yet.

>>86345256
Solo books, but teams can be interesting

>>86345256

Depends on who's writing. But I love good team dynamics when they're done well.

depends on that characters, if it's a book full of people that dont have books then they can change or die or whatever, but solos usually hold the bigger beats for characters

>>86345256

I prefer team books because the art has more variety and if one character sucks, you could always rely on one of the other members to carry it back up. If your solo book character sucks, it's pretty much over.

>>86345256
I prefer solos, but I don't mind team books so long as the characters mesh well and their interactions with one another don't seem forced. Excalibur is one of my favorites and I only intially read it for Nightcrawler

Solos with small teamups once a in a fullmoon. When it comes to team books, I prefer massive teams.

solo
Hellboy > BPRD, come at me

Solo books, they usually focus on the characters I give a damn about, while with team books I'm stuck with a Beast Boy or Jean Grey plot line when I'd much rather be reading about Starfire or Magik.

It depends on the character

>>86347152

i tried to come at your face but i came on your chest instead. be grateful this time you peasant.

It depends on the characters.Team books are fun because you can showcase multiple characters who can't carry a series by themselves.

One thing I hate about Team books is that writers kill off characters for shock value.