>'X-Men' >there are girls in their ranks

>MANkind
>there are women on earth

really makes you think

Wo-Men??

With the X-Men they include everyone.

>>86339572
>huMANS
> there are 4 kinds of gender with that race

>>86339557
>X Men
>Former Men, now women

>>86339619
There are only two genders.

>>86339557
>"X-Men"
>implying mutants are people

>>86339638
there are no genders or infinite genders

nothing else makes sense

>>86340654
Two (2) genders, my sexually confused friend.

>>86340685
What about hermaphrodites

>>86339619
I agree with their being only two genders, but just out of curiosity, what do you think are the other two?

>>86340780
that counters my point so I ignore it all together

>>86340786
"neither" and "snowflake", which can optionally be condensed into just "snowflake".

File: giphy.gif (1MB, 638x261px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 638x261px

>>86340848

X-Men is one of the few comics that actually have good female characters. Most their females are better written then their males.

>>86340801
Faggot

>>86340848
why would neither be snowflake? Wouldn't it be less snowflake than the traditional perspectives?

>>86339557
>'X-Men'
>there are girls in their ranks
Yeah, they're ex-men

>>86339638
Two sexes, but many genders.

Sex is biological, while gender is a social construct.

File: 1471922892215.gif (324KB, 401x353px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 401x353px

>>86341656
>while gender is a social construct.

man is short for humans

>>86341656
Fuck off Margaret Mead

File: Irony Metre.jpg (9KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 200x200px

>>86341677
>Implying there is a connection between Gender Studies types and fedoratards other than mutual antagonism.

>>86341718
>Margaret Mead
Simone de Beauvoir.

>>86339619
>there are 4 kinds of gender with that race
You mean hermaphrodite and neutral?
Does it really count if it's a biological fuck up?

>>86339638
>>86340685

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sex_and_gender_distinction

>>86339557
>X-Men
>EX-Men
They're trannies.

>>86339572
>manKIND
>we're not that nice to one another

>>86341790
There's no such thing as a biological fuckup, nature by itself cannot make mistakes, humankind simply perceives them as such

>>86341845
>wikipedia

>>86342918
>references

>>86339557
you can't spell women without men

>>86339557
fun fact, etymologically, women are human females while men are inhuman males. a human male is called a wereman but since no one uses that term it reads as western society unanimously declaring men as subhuman

>>86339557
Of course there are girls they're ex-men.

>>86342681
>what is natural selection?
>what is being born without essential organs?
>what are humans?

You know, even though marvel doesn't give a shit about x men in favor of pushing MCU things, you'd think they'd have an X-Women title by now.

They had the oneshot drawn by Manara called X Women and an ongoing that featured nothing but female X Men members before not called X Women. But in a time where they're trying to diversify in every way possible, you'd think they pull their head out of their asses and give fans an X-Women title. They already know each other unlike the A-Force team, their female mutants are some of their most popular characters, the female mutants themselves are pretty diverse (asian, Jubilee has dyscalculia, black, lots of bisexual/lesbians, jewish, etc) and there are a lot of smaller mutant villains nobody uses.

File: latest.jpg (8KB, 213x221px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 213x221px

>>86343109
I'm Japanese, how the hell should I know?

>>86343109
>What is the teleological fallacy?

File: 1465423834306.jpg (25KB, 470x470px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 470x470px

>>86343109
>what is natural selection?
The exact opposite of a mistake
>what is being born without essential organs?
Usually the parents fault.

>>86343207
>providing an example of nature correcting itself
>"this relates to god... somehow"

File: Laughing Stock Farm.jpg (82KB, 898x234px)

82KB, 898x234px

>>86343326