Marvel Censoring Tony Stark’s Hot Bod

>>85939710
Well at least they're both anti cheesecake AND anti beefcake

But no loss, those variant covers were awful in general
Pubebeard Loki still haunts me

Marvel's aversion to Beefcake is annoying as fuck what the hell is going on

>>85939756
I miss the swimsuit issues so much.

Reminder they put a shirt on unworthy Thor.

Marvel needs to fuck off with this shit. Give the people what they want and what they want is beefcake.

Every decision this company makes makes me hate them more.

>>85939710
Is Marvel current policy to not make anything sexy anymore?

Are their that sterile?

>>85939710
>Tony showing all those muscles like filthy man-sluts

Haram! Absolutely haram! Men are not to be sexualized!

>>85939835

>Wada and Anka pitched a new swimsuit special
>50/50 split of cheese/beefcafe
>Marvel didn't greenlight it

so fucking disappointing.

>>85939866

it's just so weird!!!

i don't see the point. the people who buy comics are twenty somethings at least. they're fine with sex and cheese/beefcake

That is so dumb.

Since the wave of censorship is coming from the left this time and the left owns the media, they're actually doing it this time instead of laughing at soccer moms and protestants

I'm actually kind of glad. If you're going to censor clevage and butts then you may as well censor everything else too. Hell, why not have them wear a fucking hijab while you're at it, Marvel? Keep it up!

File: 1446859463845.jpg (58KB, 580x391px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 580x391px

It's such an odd editorial choice. It's not like it's some kind of industry wide thing. Why does Marvel choose to be like this? I mean at other companies you have shit like pic related where they're competing over who can be more lewd and no one really minds besides "muh pure husbando" types on tumblr.

>>85939710
lol, it's just a guy putting on a shirt, jesus /co/

>>85939710
But i do questiin why he would put on the suit without a shirt.
He'll be all sweaty or get chafted.

>only actual difference is he's wearing a vacuum sealed skin tight shirt with perfect ab contouring

This is so fucking dumb. I've always hated how cape heroes are drawn essentially nude with body paint, it's so stupid looking. I mean I'm fine with cheese/beef but I've never liked that cape heroes usually wear the equivalent of body paint.

File: Grayson.jpg (2MB, 1250x1537px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1250x1537px

>>85940042
King won that competition. And that's also why Seeley can't have beefcake in Nightwing

>>85939710
Everyone in the MU should wear a Burkini and never go to France.

>>85939939
>cheesecake by Anka and Wada
Haha, fuck them.
Maybe they should have pitched 50% beefcake by them and 50% cheesecake by Cho and Schitti

This is somehow dc's fault

>>85940095
Schitti is shitty.

>>85940070
the suit should have some comfortably lining already to take care of that imo, shouldn't be a concern

>>85940084
I'm pretty sure Raptor is going to attempt to rape Dick so he'll probably get disheveled there

>>85940118
Doesnt hurt to be extra prepared

>>85940084
>That small gap between where his dick would be and how much is being censored

Unless Dick has a chode, this doesn't quite add up.

>>85939710
The best thing would be equal cheesecake and beefcake. But if not, then I'm for equal censorship.
I'm all for equal censorship
No cheesecake? Ok, then no beefcake
No woman nipples? Ok, no man nipples

File: 1468426734825.jpg (333KB, 1007x1856px) Image search: [Google]

333KB, 1007x1856px

>>85940110
DC won so Marvel decided not to compete?

File: dog american tail.jpg (24KB, 285x457px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 285x457px

>>85939710
>censoring

This word again

>>85940172
I guess it depends, we don't know Marvel's justification yet but it's entirely possible that they censored their work.

>>85940136
You don't understand angles and perspective, do you?

File: JusticeLeague.jpg (88KB, 575x885px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 575x885px

What I love about DC is they "objectify" both their male and female heroes/villains.

dc comics characters are hot as fuck.

>>85939710
Marvel's war on beefcake has to be stopped. Taking away cheesecake is one thing, but beefcake is unacceptable

>>85940136
You should worry about the fact one leg is drawned from behind/the side while the other is from the front like the rest of his body.

>>85940084
>the chin on that blue haired girl
Still would.

>>85940301
You know what they say about women with big chins?

>>85940318
N-No

>>85940352
Mostly unkind things about their giant chins.

File: 1472263698701.jpg (426KB, 1914x1914px) Image search: [Google]

426KB, 1914x1914px

>>85940367
I thought it was something worse

>>85940232
Tell me about it, they casually have Tim and Damian shirtless all the time and those 2 are minors.

>>85940318
They have big chins to cum on?

>>85940232
>Marvel won't show a guy's nipple
>DC will draw half the JL as strippers
This is why rebirth is successful

File: Beards.jpg (729KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 2000x2000px

So beefcake thread?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5aZJBLAu1E

File: ikemen statue.jpg (170KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 1920x1280px

>>85940419
You now the upcoming Ikemen line thing included Tim and Damian in the doodles

>>85940479
>rebirth
that cover isn't from rebirth idiot

>>85940479
None of them have nipples though

>>85940526
*now remember
aw

>>85940539
I'm aware, anon

File: 1469074697961.jpg (147KB, 750x621px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 750x621px

>>85940526
Thank you based DC

Thank you based Ricken

File: dick__wally_and_garth_by_r6655321-d3885px.png (15KB, 400x500px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 400x500px

>>85940526
>Lover of masks, capes, and derriéres
Indeed.

>>85939710
>practically spray-painted on shirt, looks like he's wearing nothing at all
>MUH MANMEAT CENSORSHIP

Yeah, I can't really force myself to care, what with the earlier whining about boobsocks, and such, when everyone seemed like they were sporting the painted-on look.

>>85940088
This

It would be a nice change for equality, to actually mean equal.

>>85940526
Yeah, and Damian is posing like a little slut.

File: image.jpg (134KB, 640x384px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 640x384px

>>85940088
No, if you really want to burn Marvel you have to compare them to a Christian sect, like the purtians.
Look at that whore in the middle. She's a DC character for sure.

>>85939710

I fail to see the problem senpai.

It makes sense for him to wear an extra piece of cloth beneath the armored suit. It's basically a Zero Suit.

>>85940744
Dick taught him well.

>>85940983
Starfire is basically going to be his mom in the new book too. He never had a chance to turn out pure.

>>85940949
The problem is that the worm has turned, anon.

Is Marvel run by muslims or something?

No cheesecake, no beefcake, what the fuck is their problem?

>>85941041
>the worm has turned

This is literally the first time I see that phrase used in normal speech. What's up with people using old expression that no normal people use?

I enjoy cheesecake and think it's wrong when it's censored.

I don't enjoy beefcake and also think it's wrong when it's censored.

Just sex my shit up publishers...

>>85941139
Forgive me, anon, I have a masters and sometimes I forget to talk like a human.
It is 100% unintentional.

>>85940074
Exactly. And what does that even accomplish? Instead of seeing Tony's bare pecs and abs, you're stuck with seeing Tony's pecs and abs with black paint on.
This is so stupid.

>>85939710
They are trying to spin this so you get "equality" with objectification on both sexes so they can get away with more for female characters

How is Tony ripped?

>>85941227
>They are trying to spin this so you get "equality" with objectification on both sexes so they can get away with more for female characters

So the problem is?

>>85941291
The customers they are trying not to offend don't actually exist.

>>85941270
Why aren't you?

File: loki.jpg (164KB, 780x571px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 780x571px

>>85939744

>Still no return to god of stories Loki

Why does Aaron hate us so much, /co/? Is it because we keep making fun of him?

File: 1468819809003.jpg (115KB, 1012x675px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 1012x675px

Fanservice is an objectively better term than beefcake and cheesecake.

the best part is you can see where they painted his nipple out

>>85941345
It's not really specific enough. There's non-sexual fanservice as well. Beefcake and cheesecake make it clear what you're talking about.

File: VID-20150116-WA0069.png (114KB, 240x240px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 240x240px

>>85939710
>le progressive Marvel

File: 1196698190044.jpg (124KB, 724x1252px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 724x1252px

>>85941039
>Starfire is Damien's step-mom with poor boundaries
This is like my hentais or cringey amateur POV porn
>>85941270
How is he not? He's for the most part a normal dude, well he used to be like FOREVER ago. Tony wanting to keep fit in the likely circumstance he's stuck without a suit is just common sense. Plus it looks good.
He probably could even invent one of those vibrating exercise belts that actually works.
>>85941364
Oh wow that looks awful. Thanks for pointing it out.

>>85941374

Why do you need to be specific? Also the term fanservice sounds much less dumb than cheesecake.

>>85940232
bruce would have shaved the batsymbol in to his chest hair

>>85941316
>The customers they are trying not to offend don't actually exist.

Maybe they do it on principle, some people do really believe there should be a better balance.

Also those customers do exist, I know some of them.

>>85941420
Because we're usually talking about specific cheesecake and/or beefcake.
Who cares if it sounds dumb? We're talking about comic books on a Siberian Pottery Message Board.

>>85941420
Fan service implies the artist is doing it for the fans. Sexy people are just flat out more fun to draw for lots of artists.

>>85941420
Why would you not want to to be specific? If you're casually talking about how a book is good or bad because of "fanservice" that's not really descriptive enough for someone to know what you mean. You'd have to also explain yourself and express what definition you're using. If you use another term (beefcake, cheesecake, character wanking, etc) then they'd know what you mean without that added step.

>>85941451
Balance doesn't have to mean "cover everyone up". Assuming that's what people who talk about equality are asking for is dumb.

>>85941472
>Because we're usually talking about specific cheesecake and/or beefcake.

Why? Fanservice gets the point across, and more people use that term.

>>85941451
So you know people wjo would have shied away from buying shirtless Tony?
Sure you do, anon.
I think we can also saftley assume that a company that thrives on manufactured controversy and is spearheded by a known liar (why was the FF canceled again?) is not wieghed down by concerns of principle.

>>85941528
>and more people use that term

they really don't

>>85941528
Most people on /co/ know what Beefcake/Cheesecake are as well.

>>85941340
The Loki he's using is pretty clearly God of Stories Loki. He's not actually evil, just rusing everyone, and he's constantly talking about narratives and shit like that.

The only thing is that dautermann gave him that god awful pube-beard. Other than that, he's still definitely the God of Stories.

>>85941504

Showing lots of skin have never made a lot of sense in Superhero fiction. A balance towards full suits is clearly a good idea.

>>85941552
Most people who do athletic stuff show a lot of skin. Why do you think it doesn't make sense?

File: myth-busted1.jpg (13KB, 500x243px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 500x243px

>Marvel will never go back to the CCA days

File: know.jpg (76KB, 500x381px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 500x381px

>>85941479
>If you're casually talking about how a book is good or bad because of "fanservice" that's not really descriptive enough for someone to know what you mean.

Everyone knows what it means.

>>85941552
Johnny storm bursting into flame doesn't make a lot of sense either.
Get the fuck out.

File: 1397016994348.jpg (81KB, 531x885px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 531x885px

>>85941533
>So you know people wjo would have shied away from buying shirtless Tony?

Dunno, but to me it looks better now. I can see it selling better.

>>85941580
To be fair people doing athletic shit are rarely being attacked.
To be unfair people doing athletic shit aren't usually beyond human in terms of ability.

>>85941587
This might be the dumbest debate I have seen here in years.
Kudos, anon.

>>85941587
I really don't see where you're coming from that you think the sexual definition is the default, but there's no point in continuing to discuss it when that's the main difference here.

>>85941618
Are you going to buy it, anon.

File: 36FBD21000000578-0-image-a-4_1470641643880.jpg (53KB, 634x428px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 634x428px

>>85941580
>Most people who do athletic stuff show a lot of skin.

There was also a lot of fanservice during the Olympics.

File: Goku_vs_Frieza.png (263KB, 250x409px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 250x409px

>Toonami censored things less heavily than Marvel comics now does

File: 1471723557400.png (612KB, 830x467px) Image search: [Google]

612KB, 830x467px

>>85941670
men's diving was literally televised porn

File: 1459172725645.gif (1MB, 240x268px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 240x268px

>>85941669
>buying comics

In all seriousness I buy very few comics, and pointless fanservice is usually a sign for poor writing.

>>85939710
how long till everyone is in burkas?

>>85940172
It likely is though. Censorship is not synonymous with government censorship.

If an artist draws a panel and the editorial alters it because they don't like the content, they've censored the artist

I do like beefcake, but from a technical standpoint for Iron Man, I liked the EMH thing where he wore a protective black jumpsuit under the armour.

I thought this was part of a variant about sexy men. I remember a stripper Deadpool and a naked Strange from Erica 'I draw everyone with a Mental disorder' H.

>>85941374
there is no sexual fanservice. in the past they used the word that way too but if you think about it all product is service to the fan.showing more detail on the car or some shit like that is people doing their job right, not servicing the fans

>>85941777
Seeing as how the art and story are usually put together by two diffent people, I think you might be experiencing a little bit of puritanical selection bias. And you aren't even a customer- just like I said at the start of our exchange. Enjoy ypur principles.
Good day to you.

>>85941817
It was. They cancelled those and now they're reusing some of the covers.

Also those variants were an embarrassment in how not lewd they were from the start and everyone made fun of them which is probably why they were cancelled.

>>85941420
so when you look for porn its easier
>>85941587
not really. its very subjective, especially when its from someone who is not attracted to X (a woman commenting on another woman or a gay man doing the same) when kill la kill cam out they claimed the everything was fan service even doodle looking non sexual upside shots of mako

>>85941420
Do you prefer to talk in broad terms so people don't know exactly what you're referring to?

Do you walk into a Baksin Robin's and ask for "some ice cream"?

>>85941777
good writing in comics is a myth. comics are the garbage dump of ideas where filtration tries to make a good story or 2 out of it

>>85941854

I hope the Deadpool one is still in use because it was the only one I found hot

Fuck. I remember when DC was supposed to be the prude one.

File: 1412600032456.png (624KB, 620x720px) Image search: [Google]

624KB, 620x720px

>>85941840
>Seeing as how the art and story are usually put together by two diffent people

The artist and the writer have to work very closely together, if that isn't happening then the comic is very likely to be of poor quality. Which honestly is a problem with a lot of American comics.

>>85941876
>so when you look for porn its easier

What kind of madman would use the word "cheesecake" when browsing for porn?

>>85941971
The absolute kind.

File: 1370910315330.gif (40KB, 325x325px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 325x325px

>>85941906
>good writing in comics is a myth

>>85941219

No need to apologize. That anon just needs to read a real book.

File: littlero.jpg (312KB, 1058x440px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1058x440px

>>85941897

Being specific is often pointless, there is a huge diversity of fetishes out there, you don't always have a word to refer to it.

>>85942017
60+ years of history and you can only name a few dozen stories that are eventual ruined by retcons

>>85942120

There is a difference between comics and capeshit comics.

>>85941479
>>85941897
'Cheesecake' is a term pretty much only used in western comic fandoms in this way and specifically refers to pin-ups so its not even being accurately used. Every of other medium just say fanservice and nobody ever seems to get confused of what you're referring to, some words are nuanced and have multiple meanings its called context if you're not stupid than you should be able to understand what people mean when they say fanservice.

>>85942095
Fanservice could mean anything from a scantily clad character to a reference to an earlier iteration.

You are a moron and you're crusade against the words cheesecake and beefcake confuses and angers me

>>85942213
>Fanservice could mean anything from a scantily clad character to a reference to an earlier iteration.

Which is why it's a better term. Some people get sexual pleasure from watching bare feet, so a good artist can exploit that while alienating very few people in the process.

Fanservice implies that they are thinking about their audience and how their work will be received. Which is what a lot of comic book artists don't do, they don't think.

>>85942095
Name one. Oh wait, you can't, because you refuse to assign nouns to things.

>>85942264

Have you ever visited shanachan fetish board?

>>85942144
even in image comics or whatever other kind of comics you wish to point to, there are very few good comics. most are shock shit that others would not print or boring symbolic/drama that would be in the C box of tv scripts. most never even have a resolution

File: 2dd.jpg (15KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 300x300px

>>85940084
Jesus christ

>>85941670
>The Burkini

I cannot tell you how fucking happy it makes me that my great grandparents left the middle east for America.

Thank you great pepe and nana, thank you for abandoning that shithole and abandoning Islam for a better life in 'Murrica.

>>85942348

I do think that western comics aren't a very good medium (due to many historical reasons) but there are a few good writers out there.

>>85940232
>bruce keeps the cowl on while stripping

I guess at least they're consistent in their puritan outburst. Have to take the fun out of their comic books, that will make people buy more of them. Especially women when you take their fap material away as well. They just love that.

>>85942095
no its not pointless. extra tags help you narrow it down

File: 1456358313101.png (154KB, 288x297px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 288x297px

>>85942260
But we're talking about beefy dude's with their shirts off. We're not talking about a Batman comic referencing Adam West or a cartoon showing a female character's feet.

Why would we use the term that could refer to any one of those things and a virtually infinite number of other things when we could use the word to refer to the specific set of things we're actually discussing?

Congratulations, this is hands down the weirdest, dumbest debate I've ever had on 4chan since I've been here, and that's really saying something. You should be proud.

>>85942410
>but there are a few good writers out there.
That is my point, far too few. It is not getting better because self publishing only gives as the worst of the webcomic people and there is a specific style of writting need for comics the same why the same style of writing may work in a movie but won't work in a tv show or a book,etc.

>>85939710
Why would he even need to work out anyway? Unless he's a chad, the suit does all the work.

>>85942563
>Unless he's a chad

no shit he is

File: tumblr_inline_norrevJTfS1slzud7_400.jpg (68KB, 369x332px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 369x332px

>>85942504

If you use the term fanservice alongside this image no one would be confused.

Also, how new?

So we're plunging right back to the 50's and its retarded use of comic censorship? Painting over nipples and trying to erase 'indecent' images?

Surely they know the majority of their readers are 20+ years of age.

>>85942538

That's not a bad point, but my point was that good comic writers do exist, not that they are common.

>>85942609
That is not fanservice .

>>85942609
You've still yet to demonstrate what is actually wrong with the words beefcake and cheesecake. You seem to have a personal vendetta against them

And for your information I've wasted a good 7 years of my life in this shit hole.

>>85942609
Not that anon, but why does it matter to you so much? You don't like the terms, so what. Why should we give a fuck?

>>85941340
That female version was a qt

File: 1394325360082.jpg (20KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 225x225px

>>85942661
>That is not fanservice

It clearly is fanservice, you have to be delusional to think it's not.

>>85942609
That torso and anatomy is fucking terrifying.

>>85942731
its an emaciated shirtless dude with bad art. for it to be fanservice the art needs to be hot. not all casual nudity is fanservice

File: 1464536104704.jpg (211KB, 610x954px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 610x954px

>>85942691

I just find the term weird and pointed out I liked another word better. I didn't made a big deal about it, you did.

>>85942199
>every other medium.

its literally just weeb shit. one medium.

>>85942773

The quality of the drawing has nothing to do with it, although it can help.

>>85942199
You point at a dog and say 'that animal is very cute looking' everyone will know you're referring to the dog, but it's still not pointless to call it a fucking dog.

'Cheesecake/Beefcake' refers to fanservice that is specifically erotic in nature, often characters posing half-nude or in a pin-up-esque way to arouse the reader. That's all. It's a perfectly nice term to use.

>>85942842
>The quality of the drawing has nothing to do with it
That is like a key point, doodles are not fanservice . if you are watching a show and everyone jumps from normal style to naked chibi with no erotic voice over do you think its fanservice? are style and quality are big factors

>>85942947

In the example I posted there is no change of artstyle involved.

>>85942989
That is not the point. The original art itself may not be fit for fanservice, that is usually why the fan art is modified even if the original is easier to do

>>85941950
>American Comics
Which your either don't read or pirate.
And you're just just reaching now, anon. You don't really know anything about 'american' comics. You certainly don't know how closely any two given creators are working together - as you seem to hint you do.
You aren't even a customer, by your own admission, but you are clearly a weeb. Really, in general your sloppiing over with BS, anon.
Which is fine, but don't expect me to give any weight to your opinions.

>>85940526

I'm hoping we get Hal out of it.

>>85939710
#BringBackBeefcake

I hope this gets people to shut up, because now it's clear that Marvel is doing it to EVERYBODY.

>ITT: /a/ raids /co/ with extra smugness and autism.
Welcome fellas!

>>85943158
Except we don't want it don to anybody. at least not until they start a separate erotic universe or something.

>>85943101
I really hope they don't stop with the Batfam, I really want Hal and other JL dudes

Aquaman is getting a bombshell statue, he deserves a shounen statue too

File: trinity_angels_08_008.jpg (43KB, 333x488px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 333x488px

>>85943209
>an MU where Bendis tells us his sexual fantasies

>>85943272
I'd buy the entire JL. More of a pipe dream, I'd also buy the fuck out of Midnigther and Apollo.

> bombshell

I'd kill someone for a Sinestro bombshell statue. Pilot Hal and Zoot suit Sinestro are some damn fines designs.

>>85940136
Or it's cold, and he's decidedly NOT aroused?

>>85942396
Remember, the liberated female is the one who's being told to cover up because god is watching

This is the progressive stance

>>85941340
Aaron... I honestly don't know what his damage is. I mean, have you looked at his Sorcerers Supreme team?

There are tons of magic characters in the MU yet Aaron is using his Donut Steels... Christ, when I work at Marvel, I swear the first thing that I am going to do is have his WATXM kids get the shit kicked out of them by the New X-Men.

>>85943092

I am sorry I don't buy your shitty cape comics m8.

>>85943480
>when I work at Marvel
So, never?

>>85940042
King is the most based man on the planet

>>85943524
Hey, you never know...

I may catch their eye... Somehow...

If I do, I swear to god almighty that I am going to make sure that Kid Omega remains a villain and his posse either die or become villains, the O5 are regarded as fucking jokes and that tokenism and shitty legacy characters die in a fucking fire

>>85943516
>Gotten to.

>>85939710
Marvels sex hating ventures enrage me to no end. I want to see ironmans sexy abs, but there fucking censors deem it that i cant now.

We life in a world in wich sexy is confused with objetivized.

You americunts with your first world problems were asking for this.

>>85941420
Because things like Ewing bringing up 20-40 year old things technically counts as "fanservice", whereas when you say cheesecake/beefcake, there's no ambiguity to what you're talking about.

>>85943718
First world problems are the only kind worth having, serf. Does your hut have internet? Or did you have to go to the sacred cave to post?

>>85942794

Ah that picture. That is what pisses me off the most about Current Marvel. The fucking tokenism.

I don't mean it in terms of, 'Oh, I'm a racist cunt who can't stand that there are minority heroes in current year'. That's not the issue I have in the slightest. In fact, I don't mind if a hero is straight, bent, bi, black or a cripple.

No, what I fucking loathe is that these 'progressive' books will have Whor, Anole or FalCap... But they will have no character outside being a minority.

I mean, that is the shit that pisses me of the most. People have more to their lives then their gender, sexuality and skin color. I mean, take Northstar. Yes he was gay. But he was also an absolute dick sometimes and he had that whole thing with his sister. In essence, he had personality outside of his sexuality.

Yet all the stories of the current books, the narrative bashes you over the head with the fact that the protagonists are a minority group and we are supposed to respect them for that. And the writers just assume that all the problems that we have is that they are minorities, when in actuality, it's that quite a few of them, Whor especially are shitty people.

File: 1410136902004.png (162KB, 282x270px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 282x270px

As a 100% heterosexual dude who goes to the gym 4 times a week and fucks tons of chicks, i'm appalled by this shit. Sure, covering the female characters i can get. Because fat feminists will bitch. But this? This is going to far.

As protest i stripped myself naked and am typing this down completely in the nude. I even left my windows open. I'll not be body shamed.

>>85943926
Better care about the more serious stuff than this, familia. As for me, here I'm chillin in my cave while you guys are fighting about rather trivial matters.

>>85944023
>fucks tons of chicks
Virtual girls don't count, anon.

>>85941923
Nope, it isn't.
But Pubebeard Loki is!

>>85944071

I just love the vaginas, man.

>>85944023
>As a 100% heterosexual dude who goes to the gym 4 times a week
dick or GTFO

>>85944027
Is it a limestone cave? I worked in one of those, that shit leaks in the rain.
I don't really have anything else to worry about. I sure as fuck don't care about this.
Check for scorpions before you sit down, anon.

>>85944071
Not every one on this board is a wizard, anon. Chad is here too.

>>85943327
>I'd kill someone for a Sinestro bombshell statue. Pilot Hal and Zoot suit Sinestro are some damn fines designs.

I'd help you hide the bodies!

File: Dark Knight III - The Master Race (2015-) 001-012.jpg (1MB, 1988x3056px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1988x3056px

>>85944191

Come on, stop being thirsty. We're all here to talk about comics.

Changing subjects... you know what i'd like? If DC brought their 80's mature line or just did more mature comics with their DCU characters where they'd show nipples and dicks.

Remember how cool it was in the 80's? With Swamp Thing showing his dick in Saga of the Swamp Thing, Black Canary showing her butt and pink nipples in Mike Grell's Green Arrow run, Madame Xanadu showing her pussy in all the glory for Jim Corrigan/Spectre with heavy implications that Jim/Spectre were gay for each other.

I want that shit back. DC recently showed Wonder Woman's nipples while she breast-fed her baby in Frank Miller's DKR Master Race comic.

Dr. Manhattan now is a major player in the DCU and with his blue dingus we should go for it and bring the nudity back in full force in the cape-comics.

>>85944023
>Sure, covering the female characters i can get. Because fat feminists will bitch.
That is not a good reason to do anything
>As protest i stripped myself naked
no go into the street and chant "free the peck"

>>85939710
That is not where is nipple should be.

>>85944460

I usually go out with just a boxer during gay parades. You know, just for fun and shit. I'm not gay, like i said.

I get that people want to shield women, despite that being hella dumb, but now doing these with male characters as well? This is crazy. What's next? You'll be accused of "man-something" for going out without long sleeves?

File: wom.jpg (11KB, 201x236px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 201x236px

>>85944571
>I usually go out with just a boxer during gay parades
>I'm not gay

I'd love to know who they think would be offended.
Tumblrina's are hypocritical fucks who'd be drooling all over shirtless Tony and /co/ loves beefcake more than it loves cheesecake.

>>85944613

Just for joke, man. Me and my pals from gym all do it. We like to heckle each other. Nothing gay.

>>85944403
>Madame Xanadu showing her pussy in all the glory for Jim Corrigan/Spectre with heavy implications that Jim/Spectre were gay for each other.
Please elaborate

>>85944675
>anon lives in Jesusland
>cannot admit his homosexuality because JesusISP is monitoring his content
;_;

>>85944403
B-but she's made from clay! There cannot be milk in there!

>>85944571
>I get that people want to shield women, despite that being hella dumb, but now doing these with male characters as well?
Why, in these the days of equality the women should not be any more shielded then men. also modern men are a lot more effeminate since many of the key part of their masculinity have been deemed toxic, thus they need protection.

>>85944675
Do you ever suck each other's dicks as a joke?

File: file.png (1012KB, 514x800px) Image search: [Google]

1012KB, 514x800px

>>85944689

I don't have the issues with me, so i took from Google, but there you have it. There are more pages like that from iit.

DC back in the 80's was trying to do the whole "nudity" thing in a classy way. You know, like the french comics. They even published a few GN's in the french format like Hunter Dogs. I guess they were trying to be kinda like Heavy Metal.

In this page i think that Xanadu is trying to suck Spectre's powers with her magical pussy or something.

>>85944792
Well... yes, but we don't swallow.

>>85939710
It's because Marvel's current target audience hate healthy human bodies. #StopFatShaming

>>85944824
Obviously, swallowing would be gay

>>85944925

Only women and fags swallow cum. So if you let your pal's cum get inside your mouth, even by accident, you better be ready to hear about that shit to no end.

How is that censoring, his black shirt doesn't hide anything.

>>85945187
Nipples are the work of the devil. It's all about the nipples anon.

>>85940539
you're not very bright, are you?

>>85941669
>buying comics
who the fuck reads comics?

>>85944265
Yeah, limestone. But not scorpions. Bats, on the other hand...Those shitty bastards!