ITT good retcons
That's not retcon.
Pic related is retcon.
>>85677592
Really? You pick the most autistic and pointless John Byrne retcon possible? Not a good one like making Hippolyta Wonder Woman in WW2?
>>85677636
I'm pretty sure it's not a serious thread.
>>85677592
This is without a doubt one of the most pointless retcons I've ever seen. NOBODY was bothered by the fact that Osborn and Sandman had the same hairstyle except for John Byrne. It's neither good nor bad, just completely unnecessary and contributed nothing.
Ironically, this retcon was itself retconned because Marvel declared that Spider-Man: Chapter One was non-canon.
>>85677636
>Calls something autistic
>Not intelligent to see it was meant in humor
>>85677592
>>85679737
>The BATMAN, weird figure of darkness
>>85679262
Sorry your jokes aren't funny OP. I may be autistic but I'm not as autistic as John Byrne.
>>85680930
*Rainman* isn't as autistic as John Byrne.
>Sandman is related to Norman Osborn
>Not Juggernaut
>Not Man Mountain Marko
Flint Marko being retconned into being a super contrived alias based on his teachers in high school was dumb too.
>>85681005
yeah but that whole thing ammounted to a decent story with his dad and all.
I liked it
>>85677592
Byrne please
>>85681483
That is THE retcon, no one has managed to do it better in all these years. The only one that comes even close is the Miracleman one.
>>85681483
I wonder how people reacted to this.Was Swampy popular at all back then?
>>85681618
What happened in Miracleman?
>>85681660
As someone that started recently with swampie with the original series.It blew my fucking mind.
>>85681660A superhero basically finds out that his whole Silver Agey career has been a lie and he was actually a government superweapon all along
You shouldn't read that spoiler though, you should read Moore's Miracleman.
>>85682185
Surprise was ruined for me because I read reveal elsewhere ;-;
>>85682249
That's one of comics I intend to read, but backlog is fucking huge for me.