Do they fug?

they probably just build a baby
You are destined to do what you were built to do

>>85409258
>google image search
>cars rule 34

>>85409258
Nah, I don't think so.

I think they go to a factory like it was a hospital and pick one off the assembly line.

>>85409703
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTd8WcYy17E

I remember there being a deleted scene, in which the main character has a nightmare about being turned into a truck to work for the town. Rather than the body, it's the engine that makes the car who they are. So maybe they give birth to a little motor? Have some kind of parts spit out the trunk?

File: 1467212357728.png (212KB, 386x362px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 386x362px

>>85412779

File: KERCHOW!!!.jpg (49KB, 500x284px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 500x284px

Yes

>>85411751
So a retarded car is one that takes the phrase 'not running on all his cylinders' in the literal term?

Does cylinder count mean anything? Are smarter cars higher or lower displacement engines? What about configuration? That Porsche has a flat-six engine, does that mean she's a slut? Would a Subaru also be a slut?

What about hybrids? Or electric cars? Or rotary engines?

>>85409258
I saw this movie lately. It´s not the new jewel of the cine, but isn't soo bad like everybody said it was.

>>85409258
They don't fuck.

They rev.

>>85416449
The general consensus is that Cars is decent but Pixar's weaker films but 2 is bad

>>85409258
No, they are asexual, and reproduce through budding.

Cars have male/female parts. I know what you're thinking, what about mufflers? Mufflers are equivalent to anuses. And technically, their mouths are the gasholes.

>>85415409
>What about hybrids?
they're probably bi
>electric cars?
probably asexual or only reproduce in their own kind

>rotary engines?
idk