is it good?

God no. It got cancelled for a reason.

>>84538934
so was hulk.

Just read the Claremont stuff.

>>84538925
Doom Patrol is better

Doesn't get good until "All New All Different", before that it's decent at best.
>>84371524

>>84539033
hm... fascinating.

So far, Neal Adams, Kurt Busiek, John Byrne, Grant Morrison, Briand Bendis, and Mark Waid are confirmed to be a huge fans of the O5.

Anyone else

File: detail.jpg (125KB, 550x843px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 550x843px

It has some memorable stuff like the Juggernaut two-parter and the Sentinel issues and pic related but on the whole it's pretty weak. You can tell Kirby really couldn't give a fuck and it's some of his worse art of the era. Plus it has the quality of writing / plotting of a Stan Lee comic that the artist didn't give a fuck about (make of that what you will Stan Defense Force).

Notable because it has the only Marvel cape comics drawn by Alex Toth even if it does get butchered by the inking.

>>84539201
I always thought that Daredevil was much much worse

>>84539248
cont. I would also argue that beside Spider-Man and FF, 60s marvel was crap

>>84538925
It's important in that it laid a lot of ground work for later creators to build on. But, no it's not good in its own right even by the standards of 60's comics