[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

FANTASTIC FOUR 2 Still Happening At Fox, Says Simon Kinberg

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 518
Thread images: 51

http://www.comicbookmovie.com/fantastic_four/fantastic-four-2-still-happening-at-fox-according-to-simon-kinberg-a141636

The ride never ends.
>>
Wow that Reed Richards looks terrible
>>
>>82725053
Will it be titled Fant42tic ?
>>
>>82725053
They're hanging on to the rights now just out of spite
>>
>>82725053

Words are cheap.

Not saying its impossible, I'm more than willing to believe that Fox is willing to keep throwing away money just to spite Disney, but I'll believe it when principal photography starts. Until then its just hot air.
>>
>>82725053
I mean, WB said that about Green Lantern too, but they didn't keep saying it a year later.
>>
>>82725094
2 Fantastic 2 Four
>>
>>82725053
>>82725104
The thing is, if they want to keep the rights, what's to stop them just releasing a film where the Fantastic Four stand in shot for 2 hours dancing and releasing it to theatres every couple of years?
>>
>Exclusive: producer Simon Kinberg says another Fantastic Four movie is still alive at Fox, with the same cast and a “brighter” tone.

>Mired by rumours of behind-the-scenes problems and released to a hostile response, 2015’s Fantastic Four was far from the franchise reboot Fox wanted. Indeed, the removal of Fantastic Four 2 from the studio’s schedule (it was once slated for the summer of 2017) might suggest that a sequel’s out of a question.

>According to producer and co-writer Simon Kinberg, however, there’s still appetite for a sequel at Fox - even if they have gone back to the drawing board for now. When we brought the subject of Fantastic Four 2 up at the junket for X-Men: Apocalypse, Kinberg made no secret of his feelings about the 2015 film and its dramatic departure from the comics.

>“We didn't make a good movie,” Kinberg said, “and the world voted, and I think they probably voted correctly. And you can't make a good movie every time out - not everybody does. We actually have a pretty good batting average, all things considered. But I think we made many mistakes when we made that movie - mistakes that we learned from and we wouldn't repeat.”

>At the same time, Kinberg said that the desire to make another Fantastic Four at Fox still remains - and with the same core cast of the last film:

>>“We want to make another Fantastic Four movie. We love that cast - I mean if I were to say to you now Michael B Jordan and Miles Teller, and Kate [Mara] and Jamie [Bell] are great actors - we love that cast. I love the comic, I mean I love it almost as much as X-Men.”

>If it happens, the next Fantastic Four movie would, Kinberg adds, be closer in tone to the comics - so far less of the Cronenbergian body horror than we got in Josh Trank’s reboot.
>>
File: creed_michaelbjordan.jpg (108KB, 584x298px) Image search: [Google]
creed_michaelbjordan.jpg
108KB, 584x298px
>>82725053
I can see it. They have to use the property every few years or they lose it. Got to keep that property somehow. And now that Michael B. Jordan has had his breakout role as Adonis in Creed, they can use his growing start power in the promotion. And heck if War Dogs works out maybe Miles Teller can become a draw too.

And if it all just happens to fuck over Disney who took Star Wars from them, I guess that's just a bonus.
>>
>>82725053
Now this is just turning into pure utter spite at Marvel Studios.

It's a wonder why Marvel can't just buy the rights from them.
>>
>>82725192


>>“We'll try to be truer to the essence of the tone of Fantastic Four, which is completely - well, not completely, but largely - distinct from the X-Men, which is brighter, funner, more optimistic tone. I think we tried to make a darker Fantastic Four movie, which seemed like a radical idea but we were kind of messing with the DNA of the actual comic instead of trusting the DNA of the comic.”

>>At this stage, it’s far from clear whether another Fantastic Four film will happen, though Kinberg seems upbeat about its chances.

>>“We're working really hard on figuring that out,” he said. “Nothing would make me happier than the world embracing a Fantastic Four movie.”

More on this as we get it.

Original sauce: http://www.denofgeek.com/us/movies/fantastic-four/255365/fantastic-four-2-could-happen-with-same-cast
>>
>>82725197
I think Kate Mara and Miles Teller don't want nothing to do with the movie due to experiencing hell with Josh "I'm a serious artist" Trank.
>>
>>82725053
>FANTASTIC FOUR 2 Still Happening
Nope. Uh-uh. You're fucking lying

This is happening the same way the Gambit movie is happening, which is the same way the Venom movie is happening

Are you guys seriously gonna believe Simon fuckning Kinberg? Come on
>>
>>82725169
I don't think Fox has totally given up the dream that they can turn Fantastic Four into a successful franchise.
>>
>>82725244
I am shocked to think that they are even trying to pretend this considering what Kate Mara has said publicly about this movie. I bet even she knew this was gonna go south so she was pretty much unhinged about stating her dislike of it
>>
Sounds like a soft reboot to me. Same cast, same world, but total tonal shift. And the sad part? It will probably still suck, and it will probably still flop. Maybe it will be better. I mean, it could hardly be any worse, but it's not getting my money.

FOX has completely lost all respect where the F4 are concerned. They have such little regard for what the audience wants, and for actually making a decent film. This sequel is not coming out of any demand for it by anyone except the studio, and if they do this, just to keep the rights that are losing them money, they are fools that deserve any financial ruin that results.
>>
Miles Teller was a fucking great actor in Whiplash, i bet none of the actors thought this movie would be such a disaster. If they make another F4 movie it would just be to keep the rights for another x years.

I think they could go for another one to be honest since Deadpool was a gigantic success. 58 million budget and 760 million box office, excluding the blue ray sales that just released.

The problem is people don't want to see another F4 movie unless it turns out amazing. They already used Doctor Doom, so what's next? Use Silver Surfer for the 2nd time?
>>
Do they seriously believe "Fourth time's the charm" or what?

They know this movie is a joke to everybodyright?

Also I know that Fant4stic is probably the biggest modern example of a box office bomb. How they think they can even pretend a sequel is happening is beyond me
>>
>>82725328
Skrulls maybe?
>>
>>82725053
This reminds me of James Cameron making Avatar 2 all over again.
>"Avatar 2 is coming out by next year, I'm positive this will become a multimedia franchise"
>"Ok Mr. Cameron where is it, any trailers, any actors being cast, anything being written?"
>"oh...uh...well...it's coming that's for sure. It's being made right now as we speak"
>"Ok can we see it."
>"NO YOU CAN'T, IT'S BEING MADE RIGHT NOW, I DID NOT SPEND ALL THAT BOX OFFICE MONEY ON COCAINE AND GOLDEN BIKINI WHORES!"

This is what is currently going on with Fantastic Four 2 right now. Expect replace cocaine and golden bikini whores with bullets for a upcoming suicide for the executives at Fox after looking at the box office returns.
>>
ABSOLUTE MADMEN
>>
>>82725328
Mole Man. Skrulls. Namor. (Okay not him, fucking Universal.) Diablo. Psycho-man.

They need the guts to go BIG after trying to go small and seeing what that did. Giant monsters, underground cities, shapeshifting monsters taking over the world, crazy fantastic four shit.
>>
>>82725209
because if you're smart you can negotiate at a cheaper price. Disney is not desperate for F4 and they don't need F4 for Phase 3.
>>
File: images.png (5KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]
images.png
5KB, 225x225px
>>82725053

Da-ha! Not if I have anything to say about it!
>>
>>82725169

A lawsuit.

Any blatantly obvious attempt to merely meet the letter of the contract will result in Disney suing Fox, suing and winning. A court *will* give the property back to Marvel if Fox is shown making filler material just to fulfill the contract terms, they've gotta at least try to make a profitable film.

At this point its purely personal. Someone at Fox is willing to lose money to spite a rival/enemy at Disney. No rational actor would behave this way, they'd cut a deal with Disney similar to the Spidey deal with Sony, let Disney make the FF movies while Fox sits back and gets free money for doing literally nothing. Thats a no-brainer, but Fox is not acting rationally.
>>
File: chrysippus.jpg (13KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]
chrysippus.jpg
13KB, 236x236px
>>82725328
Annihilus. Blastaar. Fucking Mole Man would be preferable to doing the same villains in the same order a second time. If they do Galactus in the second fucking movie again, I'm not even going to watch a torrent of it, just on principle.
>>
>>82725053
I don't believe Fox would be that stupid in regards to making a sequel to a film so equally panned by critics, fans and even the actors that were in the movie.
>>
>>82725388
Why, Disney is richer than Scoorge McDuck right now. While I think they will lose all that moolah due to that stupid Tim Burton Alice movie nobody wanted or like. I'm pretty much they wouldn't even care.
>>
>Kinberg before F4stic came out
"We want to bring something different, darker and edgier. A unique vision and unlike the Fantastic Four in the comics because those are dumb. This is the way to go"

>Kinberg now
"Uh uh, this is gonna be brighter. We are going to stay truer to the original tone! Trank was a mistake!"

>"We'll try to be truer to the essence of the tone of Fantastic Four, which is completely - well, not completely, but largely - distinct from the X-Men, which is brighter, funner, more optimistic tone. I think we tried to make a darker Fantastic Four movie, which seemed like a radical idea but we were kind of messing with the DNA of the actual comic instead of trusting the DNA of the comic.”

Hahahahahahaha go fuck yourself
>>
>>82725413
I will sacrifice my firstborn son to Mickey Mouse if it means getting the Fantastic Four away from Fox.
SAVE US MOUSE!
>>
>>82725352
To be fair, the first two Tim Story directed movies made money. They both made around 3 times their budget, so they weren't commercial flops just critical ones. This is more like 2nd times the charm because that's the only one to fail where it matters most, at the box office.
>>
>>82725415
>tfw Disney has gotten so powerful, they don't even need lawyers to win their cases anymore
>tfw their name alone wins court cases
>tfw they have Charlie Cox represent them for shits and giggles
>>
>>82725415
Which is weird because both Tim Miller and Kinberg are really good friends with Feige and would like a crossover with the MCU.

http://www.omegaunderground.com/2016/04/13/x-men-avengers-crossover-deadpool-tim-miller-kinberg/

>“I think we all would, and I think there’s so much crossover in the comic it would be neat to one day see those characters share a movie. It would be fun to all team up [Fox and Marvel] one day, somehow, together, if that would work.”

>“Both of us are actually quite close with Kevin,“ Simon Kinberg says, “and have a profound amount of respect for what he does. And it would be fun to all team up one day, somehow, together, if that could work.”

>Tim Miller isn’t a stranger to Marvel Studios either, as he did direct the opening sequence to Marvel’s Thor: The Dark World and was hired by Kevin Feige. There’s even a nod to Kevin in Deadpool with the pizza company being named Feige’s Famous Pizza, obviously the two still share a good relationship.

>“But I would love to, someday, in part, heal the rift between the world of X-Men and the world of Avengers,“ Tim Miller added.
>>
>>82725053
they'll prob do the samething bay did with the turtles and pretty much put everything related to F4 in the movie.
i.e. the iconic mole monster coming out of the ground.
the costumes (prob be an updated version of the first FF movie - brighter/later '4')
dooms father coming to the states to get revenge and calling himself 'doctor doom'


also anyone have that pic of the cast saying or going to a con before the movie came out and no one noticing them.
>>
Well James Cameron has confirmed he's got a plan for up to Avatar 4, and the main reason he doesn't make sequels earlier is apparently he's waiting on the technology to advance.
>>
>>82725419
I absolutely think Mole Man could be a fantastic movie villain. He's got monsters, he's got the Underground, he's got "Hey, you're freaks, I'M a freak, why are we not friends?", he's got moleoids.
>>
>>82725467
>they have Charlie pretend to be blind
>and frequently point his ear at the chest of the person on the stand
>>
>>82725430
Exactly. You don't get rich by making shitty deals for properties and you don't stay rich by doing that either. Why bother with FF if they don't really need it?
>>
>>82725430
You do know Tim Burton's Alice in the Wonderland made a billion right?
>>
File: Laughing Charlie Cox.gif (2MB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]
Laughing Charlie Cox.gif
2MB, 500x250px
>>82725467
>tfw they have Charlie Cox represent them for shits and giggles
He goes in with sunglasses and a walking stick as Matt Murdock, and recites a script written by Disney, and they just win.
>>
What movies does Fox have to possibly piss of another country? I'm pretty sure the North Korea hacks were a major blow to Sony.
>>
>>82725467
>tfw they have Charlie Cox represent them for shits and giggles
This sounds so amazing, I want to see it
>>
I tried really hard to like this movie but I couldn't even finish it. It was really quite boring and the boring characters made it worse.

Not even memeing but did anyone else kind of think they were a bit autistic? Especially Reed and Sue. It's like Trank wanted to really highlight that their intellect is why they're set apart in the first place. Which is an admirable change of pace from the awful previous ones, but I don't think he did it very well.
>>
>>82725467
>>82725496
oh this would be gold
>they call jon bernthal as a witness
>>
>>82725541
>I tried really hard to like this movie
Why?

No seriously why? There's no reason to force yourself like this
>>
>>82725497
Feige managed to make a really great deal for Spider-Man, they didn't have to pay anything for him in the end.

From those leaked emails, I think Sony wanted about $5 million dollars at first for the rights, but in the end Feige managed to convince them to share the rights.
>>
>>82725512
I meant the sequel which doesn't look interesting at all.
>>
>>82725471
This is just all lip service. Just like when Hugh Jackman said he would like Wolverine to be part of the Avengers. Only money talks, unless Fox and Marvel make a deal nothing will happen.
>>
>>82725192
Encouraging to see Kinberg openly admit Fantastic Four failed as a film. Although, I have to wonder who was at fault. Trank for his odd and off-putting direction, or Fox for entrusting such a big-budget movie to an inexperienced director?
>>
>Fantastic Four producer wants a second chance with same cast

>"We didn't make a good movie," he said, "The world voted, and I think they probably voted correctly. And you can't make a good movie every time out--not everybody does. We actually have a pretty good batting average, all things considered. But I think we made many mistakes when we made that movie--mistakes that we learned from and we wouldn't repeat."
>"I think we tried to make a darker Fantastic Four movie, which seemed like a radical idea but we were kind of messing with the DNA of the actual comic instead of trusting the DNA of the comic."
>"We'll try to be truer to the essence of the tone of Fantastic Four, which is completely--well, not completely, but largely--distinct from the X-Men, which is a brighter, funner, more optimistic tone. Nothing would make me happier than the world embracing a Fantastic Four movie."

3 strikes involving a failed film adaption of Fantastic Four. He may want to try again but it's very clear that Fox cannot make a good superhero film to save their own asses, much less a Fantastic Four one. With the exception of giving people free reign which is why the Deadpool film was good.
>>
You want to do it right. Pulpy 60s 70s Science Fiction Action in the vein of Thunderbirds. Earn that First Family of Superheros moniker.
>>
>>82725591
Why not both?

Though I think Trank's ideas were shit from the start
>>
>>82725591
Apparently Trank was the same way through Chronicle, so he's pretty much a phoney.
>>
>>82725582
Seriously though, what did Marvel get from letting Fox make the X-Men TV shows?

I find it hard to believe that they let Fox do those shows without getting anything in exchange.
>>
>>82725577
>I think Sony wanted about $5 million dollars at first for the rights

I think it was Billion, not million.
>>
>>82725094
>>82725160
>>>LeddiT
>>
>>82725635
Yeah billion, my mistake.
>>
File: Bat kek.jpg (76KB, 519x600px) Image search: [Google]
Bat kek.jpg
76KB, 519x600px
>>82725467
>>
Uh huh. The cast hated it. You need to pay them the entire budget of the first or to get them back.

Individually.
>>
>>82725591
>I have to wonder who was at fault.

Most people speculate Trank and Fox interference are both to blame. But Trank is a retard. He made one good movie, and Fox hires this new 'talented' and of course cheap director to direct F4. Then he tells the cast to never read the comics, and tries to make F4 as a spiritual sequel to Chronicle. Then gets fired by Disney to direct Star Wars Rogue One. He killed his career so soon kek.
>>
>>82725660
Aren't they under contract? They can just force them to come back.
>>
>>82725627
Marvel could make a deal with Fox to give them the rights to the Fantastic Four.

While they can let them share the rights to the X-Men, allowing them to work together and broadcast a MCU TV show on FOX. Which could lead to some big Marvel MCU/Fox production movie and crossover along a Wolverine and Deadpool spin-offs.
>>
>>82725567
Well I only watched it once and didn't finish it, so it's not like I was expending any real effort.

What I mean is, I attempted to give the movie the benefit of the doubt and judge it on its own merits, rather than letting whatever expectations or reservations I had going in cloud my judgement.

I try to do that with every movie. Don't you?
>>
>>82725686
Andrew Garfield was under contract too. You know what happened with him?
>>
>>82725495
>he's got moleoids.
I'd actually love to see moloids in a live action movie. We've gotten 3 movies without seeing a hint of them, and we've gotten a shitty excuse for Doom 3 times. Three movies they've tried to use Doom, and they haven't gotten him right once, but they have a vague idea that he's their nemesis, so they just keep forcing him in.

Fox still doesn't get that it's not completely about the tone for the F4. It's about boldness. The Fantastic 4 is a high-flying science fiction adventure, which needs you to commit to the crazy Jules-Verne-y elements to make it all work. "Dark" or "light", all the movies so far have been bland, uncommitted shit. They turned Doom into an executive. They his Galactus in a cloud. Then they turned doom into a...I don't even know what transformed by alien goo, at the end of a movie that's an extended superhero first act. It's just embarrassing.
>>
That's just one producer talking. Probably trying to start a buzz that would convince the FOX execs.

Does Disney even wants the franchise back at this point?? The brand is probably soiled in the general public's mind.
>>
>>82725690
I do that with movies that seem like they have even the smallest mediocrum at the least of trying to be good. Nothing from what I was seeing from the first announcement of it seemed good
>>
>>82725053
Why does Murdoch keep letting this happen? He could buy himself half a wife with what was lost on f4ntaustic.
>>
>>82725713
They manage to redeem Daredevil. And they might be redeeming Ghost Rider when the time is right.
>>
>>82725713
Nobody cares about the F4 but I'm pretty sure Disney would love the F4 villains considering they are Cosmic now while Fox isn't even close
>>
>>82725306
I'm trying to find that video where she shittalks it during some press interview for the Martian. No way they'll bring her back for it
>>
File: bloody frank.png (210KB, 443x462px) Image search: [Google]
bloody frank.png
210KB, 443x462px
>>82725558
>he goes into a Punisher rant about Fox being maggot pieces of filth
>>
File: spiderman.jpg (197KB, 1394x1442px) Image search: [Google]
spiderman.jpg
197KB, 1394x1442px
>>82725635
>Share rights with Marvel. This benefits Marvel more than us, so not that great.
Sony got cucked.
>>
>>82725053
Just swap them to Marvel for the TV rights to X-Men. Literally nobody in the world wants to see another shitty FOX4stic
>>
>>82725053
JUST
>>
>>82725697
well he kinda fired himself. And ASM2 didn't do as well in the box office as they expected. Not to mention critics and fans hated it. The same mistake that BvS repeats.
>>
>>82725541
Word is Trank directed it that way, requiring the actors to be as bland and unemotional as possible, especially Reed.

So yeah that's exactly what he was going for and it failed because of obvious reasons.
>>
>>82725697
Went out of his way to insult the CEO of Sony?
>>
And let's not forget how this one movie cost Fox to have steerable quarterly earning, one so bad that even Rupert Murdoch complained.

There's no way they'd do this. They'd be even stupider than Sony.
>>
>>82725736
>They manage to redeem Daredevil.
We can't forget this. They took a property that the general public had already associated with a shitty movie, and turned it into their most critic and audience acclaimed show.
>>
>>82725591
Yes.
>>
>>82725492
>he's waiting on the technology to advance.
This is the bullshitest of excuses.
>>
>>82725796
Seeing how Deadpool was pretty much Ryan Reynold's pet project that actually worked out in the end.
>>
File: DIE.png (84KB, 245x316px) Image search: [Google]
DIE.png
84KB, 245x316px
>>82725753
>Starring Emma Stone as antagonist Carnage
These people are parodies of out of touch execs.
>>
>>82725830

Ah yes, Deadpool. The movie Tim Rothman refused to green light. Know what he did green light instead? Fantastic Four 2015.

Now he's at Sony. One of his first acts? Spearhead the Ghostbusters reboot, then slash its budget in half.
>>
>>82725753
Sony doesn't know what they are doing. Maybe Ghosbusters will go to Disney next. Florida Tower of Terror gets a refit to be Ghostbusters Ride facing off against Gozer because really that new dude Rowan is shit tier
>>
>>82725853
To be fair, that's from the Ultimate Comics
>>
>>82725853
>Sinister Six will make us 2 billion!
Yep, Sony is really out of touch.
>>
>>82725893
>from the Ultimate Comics
A lot of garbage is from the Ultimate Comics.
>>
>>82725899

And what's it all building up to? The grand climax of their wonderful Spidey universe?

CLONE WARS.
>>
>>82725753
Sony execs are so out of touch it's hysterical. They almost mismanaged the Spider-Man franchise into audience apathy and seriously believe Marvel needed him more than they did.

It took one 5 minute scene for Marvel to fix him. Imagine what they'd do with the Fantastic Four and characters like the Dr. Doom, Silver Surfer, Galactus, and The Watcher.
>>
>>82725862
Yup, and looking at the Like/Dislike bar on Ghostbuster first trailer. I'm believing that history will repeat itself like it with Fant4stic.

Not because the cast is female. But seeing how dull, unfunny and painful tryhard it is.
>>
>>82725862
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPAklIlov-A

Its a disaster.
>>
>>82725899
It's like Amy Pascal is completely running on what she wants to have happen, and not what could actually ever happen in any reality.
>>
File: fantastic4.jpg (182KB, 1024x520px) Image search: [Google]
fantastic4.jpg
182KB, 1024x520px
>>82725487
never mind, found it
>>
File: 1450316990882.png (204KB, 200x421px) Image search: [Google]
1450316990882.png
204KB, 200x421px
>>82725753
This show how much they were desperate and in denial. No wonder they just took Disney's offer the next time
>>
File: sony.jpg (114KB, 1114x534px) Image search: [Google]
sony.jpg
114KB, 1114x534px
>>82725884
You're kidding me. Sony clearly know exactly what they are doing!
>>
>>82725940

That's exactly what happened.

What was it she once said? Ah yes, "Honey, you don't turn down Spider Man".
>>
>>82725942
to be fair, no one cares about fantastic four characters
they're old and not interesting

plus the actors were (mostly) new
I'd probably only recognize mara
>>
>>82725940
Which is why she's been demoted and put on Producer to Ghostbusters but she's taken over and Ivan Reitman has been frozen out of any production control.
>>
>>82725053
>Reed Richards and his girlfriend Sue Storm and her brother Johnny are working on a rocket for the US government
>the US government is afraid they will lose the space-race to rival country Latveria, so they send US official Ben Grimm, a friend of Reed Richards and fairly involved with the project to Latveria
>Ben sabotages Latveria's machine, causing it to explode, injuring Dr Victor Von Doom, who went to the same university as Reed
>The USA's rocket/machine is finished and the government tell the team (Reed, Sue and Johnny) to take Ben Grimm as a thank you for sabotaging the enemy
>while the crew is celebrating on the ship, Ben reveals to them that he sabotaged Latveria's work, causing a heated argument with Reed
>due to the fighting, they don't notice the cosmic radiation heading for the ship and are hit by it
>they crash land back on Earth and discover they are beginning to develop powers
>Doom has been badly injured by Ben's sabotage, with internal injuries and a small scar on his face which he is more angry about than his other injuries
>he is told he is not going to live so he is approached by gypsies who believe they can keep him alive through magic
>he dons the metal suit partially as life-support and also as traditional Latverian armor, he puts on the mask while it is still hot and, because of his impatience, burns his face
>Doom had become a figure of inspiration for the people of Latveria after surviving against the odds, also because he is a leading scientist
>the cloak/hood he wears is due to his high status in Latveria
>Doom discovers his equipment was sabotaged and he suspects rival country USA is responsible
>the Fantastic Four have control over their powers now and are working with the government
>Doom launches an attack on America, and the government assigns the Fantastic Four to stop him

I wish they would use something like that.
>>
>>82725558
>Yes, I walked out of this movie
>AND I'D DO IT AGAIN
>>
>>82725753
Amy Pascal is the epitome of higher ups in suits who have no fucking idea about their products but are just interested in profits. BASED Kevin Feige.

I remember her hilarious emails exchanges with Joss Whedon who gave tips on what not to do after he saw test screening of ASM2. And Sony ignored everything. Good thing this bitch is fired though.

https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/40511
One of her emails confirmed Ryan Gosling was interested in a Bioshock movie
>>
>>82726039
The tips were given by Feige.

https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/88763
>>
File: 1457632713546.png (380KB, 800x400px) Image search: [Google]
1457632713546.png
380KB, 800x400px
>>82725753
>This benefits Marvel more than us so not that great
>Sell license for at least 5 billion dollars
>Russo Brothers directing ASM3
>Wanting Marvel to pay another fucking 2 billion
>They were going to give up the rights to Spider-Man anyway in 2020

Holy shit. Just holy shit

Next time you see someone trying to defend ASM2 and how Sony had their own vision, just show them this
>>
>>82726080

No one would defend Sony except the mentally challenged.
>>
>>82726064
>There is too much back and forth with Peter and Gwen – can we recut the Dim Sum scene so that it doesn’t feel so repetitive of their break-up in the last movie – Can Peter be more honorable and definitive and less wishy-washy?

>Why do we need a year to pass…
Lel, he seems so exasperated.
>>
>>82725950
>I'm sending you some suggestions between two lines of cocaine
>>
>>82726105
It's business.
You don't think other companies aren't so selfish, greedy and dickish, do you?
>>
>>82725531
IIRC, the Sony hack was later shown to have been done in a way that it almost certainly was an internal job. Possibly by a disgruntled employee.

So, is anyone here working for Fox's IT department disgruntled enough to browse 4chan when they should be working? Because I might just have an idea for how you can get back at your bosses.
>>
>>82725950
The only reason I have a Snapchat is because my female friends insist on using it over text

You can actually "follow" people on it?
>>
>>82725862
Not just Deadpool, which Liefield confirmed Rothman was the main guy trying to stop Deadpool.

http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=303032&highlight=rothman:

>Things that Fox under Tom Rothman's eye has been bashed for (as far as I know): Editing "Die Hard 4" to make it a PG-13 film even though the previous three, had been R-rated. This pretty much meant that Bruce Willis couldn't say John McClaine's trademark "Yippie-ki-ya, mother ***er!" line as it was fully intended.

>The mismanagement of the production for "X-Men 3". For instance: *Not waiting for Bryan Singer to finish working on "Superman Returns", and not having a replacement director until I believe weeks before filming was due to start. And when a director is finally hired, it's Brett Ratner, who has grown a reputation for being a hack, douchbag, MTV music video, action director.

>**Not waiting for several actors (e.g. James Marsden, Rebecca Romjin, and Anna Paquin) to take care of prior engagements before filming. For in the process, certain characters were "killed off" as a matter of convinence.

>**Seemingly rushing the production as means of retailiating against Bryan Singer for heading off to make "Superman Returns" (which also opened in the summer of 2006).

>**Tom Rothman also allegedly didn't want Sentinels (the gigantic, mutant hunting robots) appearing in an X-Men film because he believed that audiences would immediately think that giant robots appearing in live-action would be too "silly". This was of course, before "Transformers" (a movie for which Tom Rothman allegedly turned down) came out.

>*Ordering Ridley Scott to edit his movie "Kingdom of Heaven" to make it look like a more formulaic action-adventure film, when Scott intended for it to be much deeper.
>>
>>82726129
Yeah but this is for those trying to think Sony had any kind of idea what they were doing
>>
File: Amazing.jpg (19KB, 380x254px) Image search: [Google]
Amazing.jpg
19KB, 380x254px
>>82725753
>Spider-man vs. The Amazing Spider-man

I want to see how terrible this would be.
>>
>>82726168
>*Having "Daredevil" edited to make it appear more like a summer blockbuster (i.e. more CGI) in the mode of "Spider-Man". "Daredevil" was initially conceived as a more violent, R-rated film in the mold of Frank Miller's run with the comics.

>*Not giving the "Fantastic Four" films a better budget, to go along with hirining Tim Story (who is primarily known as a comedic director rather than a sci-fi, action-adventure director) and aiming for a campy, cookie-cutter, sitcomy feel. Rothman also allegedly thought that it would be better for us to see Galactus as a cloud.

>*Trashing plans for an "ID4" sequel.

>*Browbeating "LXG" director Stephen Norrington until he quit the business altogether. Rothman also allegedly almost convinced "I, Robot" director Alex Proyas to give up filmmaking.

>Tried to ruin X-Men (2000) by cutting down budget and moving the release date from November 2000 to May 2000.

>X2's budget get cut down too.

>Said no to Alien 5 by James Cameron and Ridley Scott because "We have a good script for AVP."

>Burton's Planet of the Apes remake being rushed into production. Which resulted Burton's comment "I'd rather jump out of a window than do Planet of the Apes 2."
>>
>>82726134
>IIRC, the Sony hack was later shown to have been done in a way that it almost certainly was an internal job. Possibly by a disgruntled employee.
I thought it was from Best Korea?
>>
>>82726105
When Marvel releases their Spider-Man movie ASM2 will be called SpiderKino.
>>
>>82726134
Honestly I'd love some WB leaked emails instead.

I can't imagine the shitshow going backstage now after the whole BvS fiasco.
>>
File: Larry.webm (246KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]
Larry.webm
246KB, 500x281px
>>82726189
>Said no to Alien 5 by James Cameron and Ridley Scott because "We have a good script for AVP.
>>
>>82725753
>THE THOUGHT MARVEL WOULD JUST GIVE THEM THOR AND DAREDEVIL FOR SPIDEY

Haha, holy shit these guys are so fucking out of touch.
>>
>>82726189
>>82726168

Wow.

Have fun, Sony. You deserve this guy.
>>
File: MCU Hype Train.jpg (140KB, 1024x581px) Image search: [Google]
MCU Hype Train.jpg
140KB, 1024x581px
>>82726064
Impressive. Feige saw immediately almost all the problems with ASM2. The man knows how to do his job
>>
>>82726189
and now he's going to ruin Sony, meaning Ghostbusters and Spider-Man are pretty much screwed.

That's was bad timing on Marvel finally getting Spidey back.
>>
>>82726296
honestly, it's more impressive that Sony didn't.

Feige doesn't call out anything that you or I or anyone with half a brain wouldn't.
>>
>>82726267
They do realize that Thor is only successful because of the MCU, right? I, and I assume most here, would not see his movies if they weren't MCU canon.
>>
>>82726129
I'm not faulting them for making moves because of business. I'm faulting them for making completely idiotic decisions and being completely out of touch with reality under this notion that they'll do much better business by making shamelessly desperate decisions just to copy the Marvel formula.
>>
>>82726301
Feige confirmed that Marvel has full creative control over the Spider-Man movie.
>>
>>82725753

>Spider-Man vs. Amazing Spider-Man: Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield together = 2 billion

I'm literally crying of laughter
>>
>>82726331

2 billion just because it's Maguire vs Garfield? Good grief. They were insane.
>>
>>82725862

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nNFzbC0Rjr0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFCxUpGzbc4

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/gossip/confidential/sigourney-weaver-returns-dead-ghostbusters-article-1.2635262

>“I’ve never been involved in a project with so many different edits, re-edits and story alterations.”

Shit
>>
>>82726355
It's more insane that they thought a Sinister Six movie would make them 2 billion.
>>
>>82726296
Yeah as >>82726312 said most of the stuff he was criticizing is stuff the common man could be like "no Sony what the fuck are you doing"

By the way wasn't this thread about F4?
>>
>>82725053
As long as they don't bring back Trank. Or the cast. Or anything really.

I just want a good Fantastic Four adaptation. Is that really too much to ask for? They're my favorite superhero team.
>>
>>82726368

You see the toys yet? Horrible.

>>82726374

Seriously, what's with studios thinking that it's suddenly so easy to make a billion these days?
>>
>>82725053
i look forward to it, hopefully it does well
>>
File: 1445904850133.jpg (6KB, 251x187px) Image search: [Google]
1445904850133.jpg
6KB, 251x187px
>>82725753
>Sinister six is still appealing, potential to break 2 Billion mark. This achieved by adding more exciting and dramatic special effects
>>
>>82726399
>Seriously, what's with studios thinking that it's suddenly so easy to make a billion these days?
Because honestly it kind of is. Entertain the people in the right way, especially with established franchises and you can make a billion. Who honestly expected Jurassic World to do that well?
>>
>>82726399
Disney Doing it. After spending YEARS setting up those films. They don't seem to get it.
>>
>>82726412
>i look forward to it
No you don't
>>
>>82725950
>We at the studio want a Spider-Man with attitude. He's edgy, he's "in your face." You've heard the expression, "let's get busy"? Well, this is a dog who gets "biz-zay!" Consistently and thoroughly.
>>
>>82725053
Great, Fant4stic was a great film. Better than anything the MCU has ever put out. It's just the critics and the public that are wrong.
>>
>>82726344
>Homecoming ended up terrible
>"i-it's Sony's fault, guys!"
Can't wait to see those retorts.
>>
File: hard.png (87KB, 500x469px) Image search: [Google]
hard.png
87KB, 500x469px
>>82726473
>>
Wasn't there early talks of Sony thinking about:
- Aunt May movie
- Sinister 6 movie
- ASM3, the plot was Peter was going to use the regeneration formula to revive Gwen's dad or some shit
- Spiderwoman movie

Sony fucking delusional as fuck.
>>
>>82726189
>Said no to Alien 5 by James Cameron and Ridley Scott because "We have a good script for AVP."

This is by far the worst offender. What a fucking idiot.
>>
>>82726454

So he's pro-active?

>>82726507

Gwen's dad AND Gwen. Everyone at Sonyvagreed killing her was stupid.
>>
>>82726418
Well someone approached it to make good movie first and then the rest followed.
>>
>>82726454
When was the last time I heard Biz-zay?
>>
>>82726521
Have them both working on concert could have been great. Still like Ridley Scott thematic horror more.
>>
>>82726500
Okay but what if it's good
>>
>>82726314
>They do realize that Thor is only successful because of the MCU, right?

Thor is popular because of Loki. Everyone loves him.
>>
>>82726355
It's just otherworldly amounts of stupidity. They seriously believe a crossover battle film between a 45-year-old Tobey MacGuire and Superhero-by-Committee-Man would make billions of dollars. No wonder the studio almost went under last year.
>>
>>82726504
I got you to reply, besides, it's true. It's a body horror disguised as a capeshit flick which illustrates the duality of man.
>>
>>82726618
>It's a body horror disguised as a capeshit flick
If only it actually was that
>>
>>82725471
Kingberg is basically a Disney/Marvel boy who is trying to carry Fox Marvel properties properly, somehow he failed or gave two shits about FF, but the thing is that even as a producer, that doesn't mean he has a say in anything rights related. He wish for Fox to fucking listen to him and let the franchise to crossover, but Fox is that sad kid who likes to play alone in the sandbox, they are still pissed over the fact that they don't own star wars anymore
>>
File: 400000.png (537KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]
400000.png
537KB, 600x900px
>>82726618
>I got you to reply
Shouldn't you be at school son?
>>
>>82726500

It is literally unprecedented for an MCU movie to be terrible.
>>
>>82726607
To be fair, he is the MCU's best villain that isn't on TV. And even TV really has only Ward and Fisk in the running.
>>
>>82726651
>son
Are you hitting on me?
>>
>>82726640

They still have A New Hope.

Kinda afraid to see what they do with it...
>>
File: 1428815858237.jpg (33KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]
1428815858237.jpg
33KB, 300x300px
>>82726669
yes
>>
>>82725753
>Sony got cucked.


>Pls gib 5 billion for Spidey even though that's more than what you bought all of Marvel for
>How about you give him to us for free?
>... Okay
Fucking steamrolled.
>>
>>82726560
>So he's proactive?

Oh, God, yes. We're talking about a totally outrageous paradigm.
>>
>>82726652
I hate Thor 2
>>
>>82726696
kek
>>
>>82725053
>>82725192
>>82725213
There's absolutely no way they will actually make this, at least not a sequel with the same cast.

NOBODY went to see the first one, and it's regarded as one of the worst cape flicks of all time. There's no money to be made here. Nobody's going to see a trailer with the cast from that train wreck and be like "wow this one looks good!"

The only hope they have is to totally reboot, and even then I think their chances would be slim. They've straight up damaged the property at this point, I think literally the only chance FF has to be embraced by the public would be if they were brought into the MCU, and even then Marvel would have their work cut out for them to shake off the perception that the characters are "lame"
>>
>>82726728
Yeah really this is like thinking that The Last Airbender 2 is gonna happen

And that one did way better than F4stic
>>
>>82726663
>not Zemo

Loki is like a bumbling fool
>>
>>82725053
MCU Fantastic Four should be from the 60s, even if they have to explain they were in the Negative Zone for 50+ years, I want them to be modernised cheesy 60s Sci-Fi
>>
>>82726663

>Ward
>Not Purple Man

Nah nigga, Agents of Shit can eat a dick.
>>
>Melissa McCarthy felt the Ghostbusters trailer was a bad representation of the movie and "very confusing"
>told the studio
>they respond with, and this is the exact quote, 'we don't care what you think'

I hate Hollywood.
>>
>>82725192
>“We didn't make a good movie,” Kinberg said, “and the world voted, and I think they probably voted correctly.
Christ, I wish Snyder would say this instead of "You guys just didn't get it."
>>
>>82726748
Script Shamdalama is working on for Avatar is Korra
>>
>>82725753

The only reasonable statement here is Dylan O'Brien for Spider-Man and I am sure that was not Amy Pascal's idea.
>>
>>82726865
Sony's just retarded though
>>
>>82726865
Boco, don't you fucking tell me that you're looking forward to the new Ghostbusters, are you?
>>
>>82726890

So is Fox.

1858
>>
>>82726897
Don't know about them but I just wanted it to exist on the animated level again.
>>
>>82726882
Well Sony did ditch Dylan for Asa Butterfield. But Marvel got their way with Tom Holland.
>>
>>82726897

I may have once had a tiny, microscopic hope of it at least being average.

But not anymore.
>>
>>82726972
Yea I've written out the beginning of a treatment that could work greatly.

Sounds exactly like a complaint they'd have in a sequel when even though Statue of Liberty is sitting in what is now "Liberty Square". People don't remember the reasons its there.
>>
>>82726866
1. It's too close to the release.

2. Has Snyder ever apologized for one of his movies?

3. There are just enough delusional DC fanboys accusing critics of Marvel payoffs for Snyder to stroke his ego and his "visionary direction" that he probably wouldn't feel the need to apologize
>>
>>82725413
I love you, Mickey!
>>
>>82726865
In their defense , this is the same woman who spearheaded Tammy and The Boss. I wouldn't listen to her either.
>>
>>82727067

But Melissa is a huge fan of the old GB cartoon. She gets it.

Sony doesn't. Or at least Feig.
>>
>>82725753
>Spider-Man vs The Amazing Spider-Man

I know it would be terrible but fuck I want to see this movie.
>>
>>82727041
>Has Snyder ever apologized for one of his movies?
You will never understand the deep artistic vision that is Sucker Punch. Too Kino for it's time.
>>
disgusting
>>
>>82725753
>make ASM3 animated
>make SM4 with Raimi and Tobey
>ASM vs. SM
>Sinister Six will make 2 billion

Jesus Fucking Christ
>>
>>82725457
But then we'd have to suffer through current Marvel making FF comics. And this time there's no Hickman.
>>
I really liked it
>>
>>82727041
It's strange to me. BvS definitely did not deserve the hate that it got, and Civil War is definitely not the best Marvel movie out there.

BvS 7/10
Civil War 8.5/10

Such a strange summer.
>>
>>82725616
I'd kill for Marvel to get the rights back and have a 60's era Ant-Man/Wasp crossover with the F4.
>>
>>82727336
you might get shit for Civil war but honestly I get it. Once the high of spiderman, the airport scene, etc wears off more people will start complaining about the stuff that was off.

Still haven't seen BvS so I don't know about that.
>>
>>82727446
And then when they come back in the modern era. Pym punches Reed in the face.

"Nice to see you too Hank. You're looking well."
>>
>We WANT TO MAKE another Fantastic Four movie.

Sounds like they're begging to keep the license more than anything. Keeping the same cast is just punishment for the cast because each of them is more popular having done something else. Whiplash, House of Cards, Creed, TURN...
>>
>>82725467
Thank you Wesley
>>
>>82725753
>Part 1
>Part2
followed by
>Part 1
>Part 2

>2 billion in PROFITS for Sinister 6

>Disney offered 1.5billion just to give it all back.
>>
>>82726217
Same here.
>>
>>82725169
The theater companies not putting it on screens.

$5 says a lot of straight to DVD crap fests were rejected to be shown by the big theater companies first.
>>
>>82727336
No, I totally am with you on this one.

Iean BvS wasn't perfect but I was expecting it to be utter shit the way the critics and /co/ teactes to it but it wasn't even that bad, the people I went with liked it.

My cousin heard it was bad and he didn’t even bother seeing it for awhile until I told him to watch it, he did and he liked it.

I also saw Civil War and I liked it better than BvS but I feel that it's not the best superhero movie ever and I liked TWS better.

So yeah I am with you on that one.
>>
>>82727838

That'd be a fun read.
>>
>>82726618
Would you describe BvS as kino by any chance?
>>
>>82725697
that's completely different
>studio doesn't want the actor for asm3, don't have to use him
>actors don't want to do fant4tic2, studio forces them because of their contract
>>
>>82725950
>EDM
Fucking dubstep crap
Spidey needs a rock score like in spectacular spiderman but i'd rather another orchestral one 1000 times than something as shit as asm2's music
>>
>>82727681
They going to keep making movies just so Marvel can't get there hands on them and make tons of money off of them because MCU.
>>
>>82727964
Yes, pure kinography. Only a fool would pass on Zack Snyder's genius.
>>
I'm afraid to ask, but what is kino?
>>
>>82725169
I think the contracts has something about a minimum budget and it having to be released in theaters. Plus I think it would give them a very bad rep and stakeholders wouldn't be happy
>>
>>82727963
Either that, or tragic. Either way, I'd probably need whiskey to get through it all
>>
>>82725420
And the director, don't forget that he hated it too!
>>
>>82728087
German for "theater"/ /tv/'s latest maymay.
>>
>>82725053
>we were kind of messing with the DNA of the actual comic instead of trusting the DNA of the comic.
Didn't that take them solid 15 years to realize. Singer's Flopapolypse hopefully will completely purge idea that capeshit should be pseudo-realistic.
>>
>>82728020
Oh bless you, anon. When you go to sleep this morning, I hope you sleep well knowing you brought the purest of joy to another person this day.
>>
>>82725053
Why?
>>
>>82728087
Kino - cinema theater in German, literally a movie in Russian.

/tv/ started using it to emphasize superiority of one movie over other.
>>
>>82727972
>studio doesn't want the actor for asm3,
That's not what the e-mails told me.
>>
>>82728152
>>82728194

Oh, /tv/...
>>
Bullshit. I'll believe it when I see it. First off, good luck getting anyone to work on the project. Because that just seems like a nightmare to be involved given the pressure itself. Second, Disney has enough lawyers and money to fight this on grounds of damaging the IP even further. Not saying they'll revert, but road blocks will be put in place trying to stop FOX.
>>
>>82728020
>Only a fool would pass on Zack Snyder's genius.
Is that why they're letting Affleck handle everything?
>>
>>82728145
Who didn't hate this movie?

I think we just liked it due to the fact so many of us agreed with each other that is was a terrible movie. The consensus was so strong.

>Fantastic 4%
>>
>>82728256
>fight this on grounds of damaging the IP even further.

This is a clause in the contract?
>>
Jesus christ is Fox trying to go bankrupt or something?
>>
>>82727336
i consider BvS to be better than Deadpool
>>
>>82728256
>Disney has enough lawyers and money to fight this on grounds of damaging the IP even further.
What can Disney even do? The Fantastic 4 movie right don't belong to them, so FOX can shill make this trainwreck, unless that's changed recently. Has it?
>>
>>82728087
It's what X-Men: Apocalypse and BVS are.
>>
>>82728288
I think they're just throwing stuff at a wall and seeing what sticks. Apparently the new X-Men movie isn't doing too well with critics and they're seeing all their options.
>>
>>82728288
Could be worse, they would be the WB. Their movies haven't done well post Harry Potter. Why do you think they're trying so hard to make sure that spin-off works?
>>
>>82728381
ah, so kino means shitty movie
>>
>>82728265
He's executive producer, he ain't directing shit.
>>
File: 1458744942777.jpg (55KB, 626x438px) Image search: [Google]
1458744942777.jpg
55KB, 626x438px
>>82728445
He's basically their Feige at this point
>>
>>82728437
You just don't GET IT, pleb!
>>
>>82728477
I thought his wife was their Feige?
>>
>>82728276
If I recall but dont quote me on it. It makes sense having safeguards in place to ensure the asset is still profitable
>>82728327
They own the movie rights but I believe the loophole is the damage done to the FF name itself. So if Marvel ever decides to print a book, thats in jeopardy given the public opinion
>>
Would Disney even want the FF back?
>>
>>82725753
>Spider-Man vs Amazing Spider-Man?
How would that be? Clone saga? Spider-Verse?
>>
>>82728507
Its a tag team with her production company getting a lot of the work.
>>
File: 1366965486016.gif (1MB, 181x224px) Image search: [Google]
1366965486016.gif
1MB, 181x224px
>>82725753

Good god is this ridiculous.

>Trade for Thor and Daredevil?
Pretty sure Thor was more successful at the box office than Sony's ASM shitfests
>Sinister Six will be the most successful movie ever and make over 2 billion dollars
What the fuck
>Sequel and definite are spelled wrong
Pascal must be old as fuck
>Great professionalism from both sides
kek
>>
>>82728619
For the team? Possibly. But the real interest is everything related to the FF. Back in the day, Marvel desperately wanted the rights for Galactus, The Silver Surfer, and arguably Dr Doom. All of which would be great groundwork for phase 4 and beyond
>>
>>82725753
wait wait wait
so.... in just 4 years, Marvel owns the movie rights to Spider-Man fully since theyre paying 2 billion?

How much damage can Sony do by then?
>>
File: Quill.jpg (37KB, 284x413px) Image search: [Google]
Quill.jpg
37KB, 284x413px
>>82726168
>Tom Rothman also allegedly didn't want Sentinels (the gigantic, mutant hunting robots) appearing in an X-Men film because he believed that audiences would immediately think that giant robots appearing in live-action would be too "silly". This was of course, before "Transformers" (a movie for which Tom Rothman allegedly turned down) came out.
>giant robots would be too silly

And yet he thought that this guy looks totally serious
>>
>>82726507

iirc the idea for the Aunt May movie was to have her be in her younger years and an agent for the government in an attempt to fill a similar mold that Agent Carter did.
>>
>>82728776
I thought Sony basically lost control of the wheel and are essentially collecting a paycheck? The only thing I think theyre allowed to play with is Venom
>>
>>82725053
Bullshit. Hes trying to save face and probably isn't in on the disney fox talks.

After the amazing amout of love for MCU spidey and the fail of F4, and looking to be a fail X-Men, Fox is playing ball. Hell, they were playing ball a while ago when they had 2 X-Men tv shows go into production. In order to even start that they had to give up something. All Disney needed was a foot in the door to stsrt negotiations and now that those have started they are going to push hard to get at least shared rights.

Fox is actually in a worse position than Sony was. The only thing they have is something they never wanted, deadpool. No one will trust a F4 movie from them anymore and they are losing their big wolverine. They need to play ball with disney.
>>
>We still have the property! NEVER EVER MARVEL!

Meanwhile Marvel doesn't even need it.

Seriously Fox lucked out that they have X-Men which work well (if not better) in their own universe. Spiderman is not really enough to sustain his own shared universe, and Sony got boned. Kinda wish this trend never kicked off, but that's where we are i guess
>>
>>82728834

Technically, they can still do anything they want with Spidey and his cast.

They just don't want or need to now.
>>
>>82728842
Actually I think Sony is/was in a worse position. The studio itself is nigh bankruptcy and FOX can still scrap by with the X Men
>>
>>82728898
I think the corporate heads over in Japan are stepping in too. Last I heard they were furious that the studio couldnt make a profit on Spider Man of all things, so its possible in the span of one phone call they told the suits to shut their damn mouths and take the money.
>>
>>82728842

Nah, there's plenty of shit they can do with X-Men. Sony is worse off because they only had Spidey, and now are going all out on some Valiant properties (which i'm not looking forward to because they've already proven they can't do comic shit) which are a tough sell due to their obscurity and Robotech which is ancient and nobody remembers
>>
>>82728958

I heard that, yeah.

What's Pascal doing now?
>>
While were on the subject of corporate rights, its still a shame Marvel cant do shit with ROM Spac Knight
>>
>>82729023
What's the deal with that?
>>
>>82725753
>prod of all of u

How are these people making more money than me?
>>
File: animoot no words for that feel.gif (72KB, 269x200px) Image search: [Google]
animoot no words for that feel.gif
72KB, 269x200px
>>82725053
>FANTASTIC FOUR 2 Still Happening
>>
>>82729086

Hasbro gave printing rights to IDW.

Marvel can still use everything from his comic, just not ROM himself.
>>
>>82725192
>same cast
same result
>>
>>82726640
No it's called tricking fan"oh yeah we can do crossovers just show Disney you want it to happen"
Then the balls in Disney court and behind the scenes the cost for a f4 crossover is so high Disney laughs in fox faces then fox says we tried
>>
>>82725053
Simon Kinberg is balls deep in X-men films that are probably never going to happen. Of course he wants a sequel, it probably unlocks capital from FOX for him.
>>
>>82725053
Will they ever stop dragging the FF through the mud? I'm already sick and tired of people saying they want Disney to get the rights back just so they can kill off the Four and keep Doom.
>>
>>82725371
>avatar
I dunno why people like that movie so much, it's fucking horrible, but then again it's the same people that liked harry potter.
>>
>>82725053
>The same cast

No way are they going to return. After the shitshow that was the production they're not going to touch it. And no one is going to want it.I'm not a "Marvel movies can do no wrong" kind of guy but the only way you can get good publicity with a Fantastic Four movie now is if Fox share the rights with Marvel.
>>
>>82729542
The snake oil salesmen managed to convince the public at large that 3D was going to be a thing, the absolute madmen.
>>
>>82729605

And that's probably why it made so much.

You sure don't see people still talking about the plot. Or characters. Or anything at all.

It's the most successful movie that everyone has forgotten of all time.
>>
>>82725862
>>82725918
>>82726368
No no guys. You can't say anything negative about this movie because then you're clearly just a misogynist with an anti-female agenda
>>
File: 1406804469681.jpg (158KB, 617x505px) Image search: [Google]
1406804469681.jpg
158KB, 617x505px
>>82725753
>Sinister Six has the potential to break 2 million dollars
>>
much like the plinkett reviews of starwars 1/2/3 i enjoyed midnight's edge of trankgate of the fantastic four a whole lot better than the movie
>>
>>82729728
I find the idea ridiculous itself. Lets have a movie about a team who formed and devotes themselves to killing Spider Man.................and then not have Spider Man in it
>>
>>82726301
Rothman cut the budget for the ghostbusters remake. Good on him. It's not even his fault, that's all Pascal
>>
File: ppg.png (314KB, 534x406px) Image search: [Google]
ppg.png
314KB, 534x406px
>>82725753
>in exchange for two Marvel properties ("Thor" and "Daredevil"
>make "Amazing Spider-Man 3" animated with voiced by Andrew
>Sinister Six to break 2 billion. Achieved by more dramatic special effects and adding "The Amazing Spider-Man" to the title
>Part 1 and 2
>Return to Spider-Man 4
>Emma Stone as Carnage
>Spider-Man vs. Amazing Spider-Man. 2 billion in profits

What the holy fuck am I reading?
>
>>
>>82725053
What's the best run of Fantastic Four, /co/?
>>
>>82725053
it's pretty clear at this point fox has no intention of making a good fantastic four movie as long as they get to spite marvel and dangle the rights just out of their reach
>>
>>82725753
I've read this before and every time I do I get a weird mix of wanting to laugh and wanting to throw up. These people are fucking morons. Based Fiege telling them to fuck off with their bullshit. Also based Maseo for being reasonable and realistic and not drinking the shithead kool-aid
>>
I'd rather Marvel have Silver Surfer, Galactus, Doom than the actual FF
>>
>>82729823
Have we had threads just going through the Sony emails so we can make fun of all of it? This shit is insane.
>>
>>82729997
I used to say this as well. But now i realize F4 are the best link of cosmic and earth stuff for MCU. Right now who is going to fill that role? Carol Danvers
>>
>>82725192
>It's an "execs learn from their mistakes" interview

Hilarious every time.
>>
File: kju-looking-at-lubricant.jpg (64KB, 650x501px) Image search: [Google]
kju-looking-at-lubricant.jpg
64KB, 650x501px
>>82726217
Please, Glorious Leader, make it happen. For the good of the world.
>>
>>82726177
>Spider-Man vs. Amazing Spider-Man
I'm ashamed of how much I want to see this, if only for my childhood Spider-Man to beat up the newer hipper Spider-Man and validate my insecurities about growing up in a changing, uncaring world.
>>
>>82726028
>Start a super hero movie off by having the heroes sabotage a competitor, seriously wounding him
Sounds terrible.
>>
File: Shive_What_small_45.jpg (29KB, 350x256px) Image search: [Google]
Shive_What_small_45.jpg
29KB, 350x256px
>>82725512
>>
>>82730524
That's actually canon, Ben sabotaged Doom's machine leading to his scarring, but in the comics it was just a dumb college jock playing a prank in a smug nerd on behalf of his friend Reed, in that anon's pitch is an international incident.
>>
>>82728403
Didn't WB put out Godzilla which did incredibly well?
>>
I'm just glad the movie didn't seem to ruin any of the main actors careers.

Star of Fruitvale Station Michael B. Jordan bounced back fast and hard with the critically financially successful Creed and is starring in the Thomas Crown Affair in 2017, produced by the Russo brothers.

Star of Whiplash Miles Teller, while losing the starring role in the director of Whiplashes next movie, still has the upcoming War Dogs with Jonah Hill and of course the continuing if not exactly good, Divergent films.

Kate Mara had a supporting role in the Martian very quickly after F4, and still has House of Cards to fall back on.

Jamie Bell, has Turn and doesn't appear to have any interest in films for the moment so he's basically in the same spot he was in before getting into the movie in the first place.
>>
>>82730620
That isn't nearly as bad as intentionally causing an accident which could easily kill multiple people.
>>
The only scene they need, is a charismatic scene of the team eating breakfast together, eating Ben's eggs benedict. Is that so hard?
>>
>>82725169

Marvel learnt from the first Fantastic Four movie that was never released and put some solid clauses which would force studio to have minimum requirements to make a legit movie

Unfortunately we have seen how the bare minimum of the requirements is also not enpugh
>>
>>82725053

Who the fuck is the retard Fox executive who thinks it was a good idea to even announce this?

Fox & Marvel were finallly getting along, I am pretty sure this news will fuck things up
>>
>>82730927
But that movie is the best of all the F4 movies.
>>
>>82730608
Yes, it came hot on the heels of Avatar convincing everyone 3D movies would be big, people weren't tired of Johnny Depp yet, and the Hot Topic crowd is basically cattle as far as slapping Burton's name on something.
>>
>>82730927
>>82731019
No shit, given a real budget and actually released I'm willing to bet it would be remembered fondly as a childhood classic today. Best Doom by a country mile.
>>
>>82725512
>tfw actually enjoyed Tim Burtons alice
>>
>>82731019
I actually like the 2005 Fantastic Four movie the most
>>
>>82725708
its such a shame F4 has such great villians but with fox holding them back the world wont know about them
>>
File: eva.jpg (14KB, 316x341px) Image search: [Google]
eva.jpg
14KB, 316x341px
>>82725467
>tfw they have Charlie Cox represent them for shits and giggles
This just made the top of my "things I never knew I wanted" list.
>>
>>82725737
If disney had the f4 then i think they could use them properly and not just as some generic superhero bullshite
>>
>>82731019
The most profitable too. say what you will about Tim Story, but his movies made money. Same can't be said for Trank.
>>
File: 1412845378377.jpg (10KB, 234x317px) Image search: [Google]
1412845378377.jpg
10KB, 234x317px
>>82725192
>I love the comic
LIAR!
>>
>>82731468
He's not talking about Tim story, anon
>>
>>82725192
>We actually have a pretty good batting average, all things considered.

>X-Men
>Daredevil
>X2: X-Men United
>League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
>Elektra
>Fantastic Four
>X-Men: The Last Stand
>Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
>X-Men Origins: Wolverine
>X-Men: First Class
>The Wolverine
>X-Men: Days of Future Past
>Fantastic Four (2015)
>Deadpool
>X-Men: Apocalypse

What do you think about Fox's batting average, /co/?
>>
>>82725753
There sheer amount of delusions on Sony's part in this email is blowing my mind.
>>
>>82731638
>only 5 good movies

Embarrassing
>>
>>82731638
3 on there I didn't ever see (DoFP, Apocalpyse, the wolverine), but I only thought 2 of those were actually good, a couple more alright and the majority terrible.
>>
>>82729020
Ghostbusters
>>
>>82730645
>incredibly well
No. It did well enough to warrant a sequel (which has been pushed to a later date), but nothing special. Had a good opening, then dropped like a rock.
>>
>>82731638
For kicks I went to check out the RT score of these movies and Days of Future Past has 91%, that's a fucking joke. I'm not saying the movie sucks or anything, but it should be at the high 70% at most.
>>
>>82731638
Deadpool doesn't count. They didnt want to make that movie. They were forced into it by fans and still gave it the minimum budget. There is no reason to credit fox with that. It was only a fox movie cause they had rights but they wanted nothing to do with it.

So...why does anyone put fsith in them?
>>
>>82727221
Just give the book to Ewing. The Ultimates is practically a Fantastic Four book with a different cast and a dash of The Authority anyways.
>>
>>82731947
It's almost as if Rotten Tomatoes can be wrong and give overhyped movies scores they don't deserve

Like Civil War, for instance.
>>
>>82732029
Even then, DofP has a higher rating than Civil War, which was at least five times more anticipated, this is so bizarre.
>>
>>82732029
Holy shit, you have no idea how RT works.
>>
>>82731947
If that is your rating fine. RT doesnt work like that rating system thatbis imdb. The reason why RT is controversial is because critics give it a yes or no, like siskil and ebert stuff in the day.

Personally i give it a 7.5/10 or 7. Good but i like X2 better
>>
>>82732029
That isn't how RT works.
>>
>>82725467
Thank you, Wesley.

F F F F F
>>
>>82726028
Never become a scriptwriter.
>>
>>82725145
No, they left the option open though:

http://spinoff.comicbookresources.com/2012/06/08/wb-mulls-green-lantern-relaunch/

But obviously there was no way it was gonna get a sequel. And Fant4stic is definitely not gonna get a sequel.
>>
>>82729542

It was visually beautiful, and that's all it set out to be. The plot is paper-thin because it's just there as a delivery device for cool visuals. I think that the intent was something akin to Disney's Fantasia: Something thrilling to watch without getting all caught up in characters and plot and such. On that basis I really enjoyed it.
>>
>>82732103
Oh, I see how it is. But even in a Yes/No basis, 91% yes is still MUCH more than I thought that movie would get.
>>
>>82729582

I think they're all trapped by multi-film contracts, or else they wouldn't even be discussing this as a possibility.
>>
>>82729582
Michael B Jordan is hot stuff right now, much like Jennifer Lawrence a little while ago, Fox has them under the thumb of their contracts, and they're not letting them go easy.
>>
>>82731638
Wow, that period between LXG and Origins was just garbage
>>
>>82725192
There's no fucking way in hell Mara, Jordan and Teller get back to that mess.
Not after all that crap Trank supposedly did to Mara.
>>
>>82732175
It did something new. An in cannon reboot. That is the only time that has happened in movies. Give the X franchise a lot of shit but they have the most firsts of all the cape movies
>>
>>82731947
DoFP was better than civil war
>>
>>82732285
I like DC, Fox and Marvel, and I'm just saying you don't know how RT works. Nice projection though.
>>
>>82732264
>>82732205
But can you actually name a film that had financial and critical failure that actually got a sequel or remake with the same cast?
>>
>>82732275
That's what I was thinking too, Miles might've gotten his career damaged by F4. MBJ was lucky that Creed mitigated the damage F4 could've caused.
>>
>>82732367
That's because sequels to movies like that don't happen, not because the actors refuse to play ball. That being said, there ARE ways to wiggle out of contracts like these if push comes to shove.
>>
>>82732264
There is always a way out of these contracts. Like any contract there are stipulations for backing out but usually also stuff about if the movie doesnt do good. These contracts are really complicated. But if they dont want to do it its not like they go to jail or anything. Plus after this terrible shit show they have the upper hand in negotiations. If fox fucks them over they could leak some stuff to the press and fox is in shit again.
>>
>>82732367
Fantastic 4. The one with evans and alba. Critics didn't like it, fans didnt. Still got an even worse sequel
>>
>>82732321
The in-canon reboot is such a headache, making the divergence point 1973 does goof shit like making the first part of X-Men Origins canon, so if you want to count Deadpool as canon to that universe, in it he is at least in his 60 because he appeared as an adult in the task force of Origins.
>>
>>82732519
It tripled it's budget, though.
>>
>>82732523
And Emma Frost is young in Origins as well even when she was an adult in 1963.
>>
>>82728437
When you use it ironically. When you use it unironically it means you have shit taste.
>>
>>82725753
>The Amazing Spider-Man 4, Part 1
>The Amazing Spider-Man 4, Part 2

why not just 4 and 5?
>>
>>82725753
I want to live in the timeline where Spider-man vs The Amazing Spider-man happened.
>>
>>82732813
>Harry Potter did it
>Twilight did it
>Hunger Games did it
>Avengers was going to it
That's what the youngsters are into, see?
>>
>>82732813
Because lord of the rings
>>
Man. Fox really hates Marvel don't they.
>>
>>82732867
>>>/v/ is over there
>>
>>82725279
X-Men crossover when?
>>
>>82726064
It's weird that they didn't take his advice here, most of these are solid and fair criticisms with suggestions for improvement.
>>
>>82732519
It was bad but it wasn't both a financial and critical failure. Like >>82732558 the box office got triple the budget (though they probably only got half of that, but it was enough over budget to be mild success)
>>
>>82732867
They're different departments anon.
>>
>>82729722
Lol. Just like people couldn't shit on Fant4stic because if they did, they only could have been racists upset over Johnny being portrayed by a talented black actor.
>>
>>82729754
Where did you see it? I didn't know it was out already.
>>
>>82733042

I didn't start the shittalking

>>82733165

You mess with one department, you mess with them all.
>>
>>82733050
>Next X-Men movie is rumored to be a straighter adaptation of the Phoenix Saga
>"Who can POSSIBLY get the X-Men to space?"
>"Why, I know of a group of four superpowered adventurers with experience in the field."
>>
File: 1453952904048.gif (2MB, 441x329px) Image search: [Google]
1453952904048.gif
2MB, 441x329px
>be FF fags
>normies opinions of the team come from the movies
>comic fans think the team is boring
>Marvel has written the best half of the team somewhere they never have to bring them back from
>the other half of the team are in shitty books like Inhumans and GoTG
It just keep tumbling down.
>>
>>82733310
>Marvel has written the best half of the team somewhere they never have to bring them back from

wat
>>
>>82731947
DOFP was better than Winter Soldier.
>>
>>82731405
>The Incredibles superheroics
>Meet the Robinsons intellectual/savant family dynamic
Truly the Mouse is he only one who can give us the F4 we deserve.
>>
>>82733278
With this jean? No. At least they had a good actress before the retcon. She just had a shitty script
>>
>>82733359
You already tried this here >>82732330 and no one cared.
>>
>>82733359
Kek. It was ok because it has the two sets of the best characters ever. There seems to be only one thing fox does well. The X/mag closeness. DOFP did both great
>>
File: 1453977150726.png (181KB, 309x323px) Image search: [Google]
1453977150726.png
181KB, 309x323px
>>82733310
Cyclopsfag here. At least you FF fags know where your characters are and what they are doing, we are not that lucky
>>
>>82733410
Different anon. I haven't seen civil war besides the leaked airport battle.
>>
File: 1461591026329.jpg (72KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]
1461591026329.jpg
72KB, 600x450px
>>82726874
The idiocy of those two halves combined might cancel each other out and make a good movie.
>>
>>82732867
>>82733165
>>82733232
Last I checked, the various Sonys out there (Sony Pictures, Sony Music Entertainment, Sony Interactive Entertainment, etc.) are effectively separate companies that otherwise answer to the original Sony Corporation (a major Japanese financial institution). This leads to the weird phenomenon where, for example, Sony Music Entertainment could sue Sony Pictures for using a song in a movie without proper licensing and payment.
>>
>>82733346
Reed and Sue are off outside the universe with Franklin rebuilding the multiverse with the help of the Molecule Man.
>>
>>82733524
Just write Korra as pure D-Bag Superman. It'll be fine.
>>
>>82733346
Reed is God.
>>
>>82725192
>there’s still appetite for a sequel at Fox
what they actually mean
>we will shit out another shitty reboot right before the rights expire again
>>
File: image.jpg (233KB, 883x631px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
233KB, 883x631px
>saw it on HBO yesterday
>mfw that Doom
uncanny tbph also Reed being stretched out on that table but that Doom reminded me of Orgins Deadpool also Why don't they just give it back to Marvel? does Fox just enjoy killing themselves, I guess Marvel could make a show out of them instead cause they need a break from movies obviously and it would allow them to develop a story better, it worked for Daredevil and we could get the actual outfits instead of this dumbass all black tacticool shit they been using for Fam4 and foX-men
>>
>>82733633
> Why don't they just give it back to Marvel?
Because Daredevil was a massive fucking embarrassment for them and they don't want that to ever happen again.

>Marvel offered to let them keep Daredevil in return for Galactus and Silver Surfer so they could use them in GotG
>Fox declines, letting them get Daredevil back for free under the belief that Daredevil is worthless but Galactus and SS would be really valuable for the F4
>F4 movie tranks
>F4 movies doesn't even use Galactus and SS
>Marvel gets Daredevil back for free
>Turn it into a critically acclaimed tv series that's lauded by many as the best capeshit has to offer
>>
File: NEhMU96BLDSNlm_1_1[1].jpg (42KB, 500x478px) Image search: [Google]
NEhMU96BLDSNlm_1_1[1].jpg
42KB, 500x478px
>>82726507
dont forget
>Norman coming back not as GG but as a head in a jar
>Spidey ditching the black suit because the Sinister 6 thought it was lame
>casting this as mary jane
>>
>>82733687
as much as i like Netflix DD i actually wanted to see how Carnahans 70's adaptation would have been
and as a bonus we Marvel would finally be able to adapt Annhilation
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=92cVd9HalHs
>>
File: XNtXgZK[1].jpg (31KB, 569x415px) Image search: [Google]
XNtXgZK[1].jpg
31KB, 569x415px
>>82734040
>we could have had James Gandolfini as the kingpin
FUCK THIS EARTH
>>
>>82734040
Yeah, but Daredevil kick started the whole Marvelflix thing, which has been pretty neat when you want something grittier.

And that 70's DD would've still been produced and meddled with by fox.
>>
>>82729605
3D was a thing for like three years after though and still sort of is.
>>
File: feige.jpg (27KB, 620x246px) Image search: [Google]
feige.jpg
27KB, 620x246px
>>82734469

KEKED
>>
>>82734550
Movies pushed the gimmick to fatten their revenue, sure, but James Cameron had people convinced that from now on every movie would be 3D only, like it was the transition between silent to talkies or from black and white to color.
>>
>>82733050
Probably unlikely because of the FF and X-Men contracts being separate and needing approval from Marvel.
>>
>>82725862
>Spearhead the Ghostbusters reboot, then slash its budget in half.

Wait, he really did that? I thought the Ghostbusters reboot was being worked on before Rothman came on board.
>>
>>82732854
I'm so glad Divergent fucking crashed trying to also do it. Hungers Games' last one was considered a flop for failing to make what the previous Part 1 did. Maze Runner next if it ever gets finished.
>>
>>82725862
>failing upward the story

How does anyone let this happen? How many movies has he tanked? How many does it take until he has no job and can never get one again. Uwi Bol?
>>
>>82726874
>>82733524
Makes me wonder if they would go Korrasami from the get go there.
>>
>>82725053
Good luck replacing Torch. he picked the winning team.
>>
File: smurfs.jpg (1MB, 1551x2658px) Image search: [Google]
smurfs.jpg
1MB, 1551x2658px
>>82725753
>>82726267
>holy shit these guys are so fucking out of touch.
you have no idea, here is another gem
>>
>>82732415
>That's because sequels to movies like that don't happen, not because the actors refuse to play ball.

No, I know that. But I mean that invoking the multi-film contract wouldn't work on something that was a huge flop (usually because the studio knows it's not really worth its time given the negative reaction). It's not like they tried to get Ryan Reynolds to reprise his role as Green Lantern again.
>>
>>82726399
>You see the toys yet? Horrible.
How horrible?
>>
>>82731468
No no, the 1994 film is the one produced by Corman and directed by someone I can't remember. Had a really, really low budget.
>>
>>82725053
why can't Disney just give fox a fuckton of money to get them back?
>>
>>82736368
Not worth it for what Fox would charge.
>>
File: [001849].png (98KB, 274x334px) Image search: [Google]
[001849].png
98KB, 274x334px
>>82725192
>mistakes that we learned from and we wouldn't repeat.”
>
>>At the same time, Kinberg said that the desire to make another Fantastic Four at Fox still remains - and with the same core cast of the last film:
>>
File: 17.nocrop.w529.h314.jpg (33KB, 529x297px) Image search: [Google]
17.nocrop.w529.h314.jpg
33KB, 529x297px
I can't wait to see what the next season of Arrested Development does with this material.

Also, I just learned Trank appeared in the show too. That's hilarious.
>>
>>82725192
Are the actors even gonna wanna come back for the sequel, though simon? The trashing the film received could have ruined their fucking careers.
>>
File: 1462808733817.png (330KB, 400x301px) Image search: [Google]
1462808733817.png
330KB, 400x301px
>>82725053
AAAHHHHHHRRRRRRGGGGGGGG
>>
>>82737078
From the sound of things tonight, Johnny ain't coming back. That kind of implies that he's been let out of his contract or at the very least that his management haven't been given even the vaguest idea of when FF2 might be intended to start.

If that's true then to all intents and purposes, despite what Kinberg says it's not happening.
>>
>>82725053
>fant4stic
Why do retards think replacing a letter with a number is a good idea?
>>
>>82737328
>>82737078
>>82736885
Kinberg is probably just saying this to keep rights negotiations going and maybe because of the fact X-Men Apocalypse is getting a trashing from critics early.
>>
>>82736182

Why can't any of these fuckers type for shit or at least spell check their own emails? How fucking retarded are these aborted turds?
>>
>>82726028
This has be posted alot.. plz stop!
>>
Michael B Jordan just signed on to Black Panther. This movie ain't happening!
>>
>>82737710
Marvel can't get enough of Human Torches.
>>
So with MBJ joining the BP movie, they'll have to recast, right?
>>
>>82735040
>"Once again, Kinsberg, we see there is nothing you possess that we cannot take away."
>>
>>82737783
But who? At this point, what young Hollywood stars does Disney not have their hooks into?
>>
File: 1459218719721.jpg (81KB, 539x568px) Image search: [Google]
1459218719721.jpg
81KB, 539x568px
>>82725160
2 FANT42TIC FOR YOU 4 2
>>
>>82737825
What star would want to sign on for this?
>>
>>82737825
Fuck if I know, I don't know shit about actors.
I'm curious whether they would keep him black.
>>
>>82737884
When you're young and trying to get work, you take what you can get.
>>
>>82737905
They should just continue the cycle. Make him asian. God knows they could use some work.
>>
Welp so much for that Kinberg
>>
File: laughing cat.jpg (40KB, 560x420px) Image search: [Google]
laughing cat.jpg
40KB, 560x420px
>Marvel steals their first Torch
>And their second Torch

Don't worry Fox, you can always reboot. Fourth times the charm right?
>>
>>82738008
Third, actually. The 1994 one was by some other company.
>>
>>82725053
This is happening the same way Amazing Spiderman 3, Venom, Sinister sex and MAY happened.
>>
Weren't there rumors that Marvel offered Fox X-Men TV rights in exchange for F4 movie rights?
>>
>fantastic four
>first movie sucked
>so remove one
>Four - one = three

Half-life 3 confirmed.
>>
>>82738127
Fox already has the TV rights. The only tv rights they don't have are the cartoon rights, which Marvel has only ever gone into direct partnership over in the past (with various companies including Fox).

Their ownership of the TV rights was central to their argument in the Mutant X lawsuit 15 years ago.
>>
>>82738097
And Gambit
>>
>>82738127
There are. But it's also possible that they traded it for rights to some characters. Remember how there was a proposed deal where they were willing to let Fox's rights on Daredevil extend in exchange for Galactus and Silver Surfer?
>>
>>82738127
>>82738239
Specifically, Fox has live-action TV rights for X-Men, but they need to get Marvel's approval to have the shows made.
>>
>>82725617
I think for a dark version of the Fantasic Four "body horror" is an interesting way to go, it's just obvious they got cold feet half way through and half-assed it. This should have believed in it, even if it would have been a large departure from the comics, at least it would have been a better final product.

Even the actually script it was crafted from was much better than what we got, it seemed a bit packed, and needed editing, but they pared down /way/ too much.
>>
>>82725753
>Spider-Man vs Amazing Spider-Man, bring Tobey and Andrew back

Wow, this was an option discussed. Interesting.
>>
>>82725950
The Snapchat thing is a good idea actually. Spider-Man posting pics of shit he does around the city. People would eat that up.
>>
>>82738008
Cute kitty.
>>
>>82726028
Why do we keep having the Fantastic Four work for the government?

Hell why does Doom need a good reason to hate people? The whole point is that he did it to himself and can't handle that so he blames the world.
>>
>>82725943
Well yeah, the e-mail leak probably had them needing to make a deal with Disney/Marvel fast.

But you look back and you can see how much more desperate and fucked up it was for them.

http://geektyrant.com/news/sony-hack-surprising-details-on-spider-man-mib-3-and-slams-on-adam-sandler

From an e-mail:

>Are you aware that Men In Black 3 may gross $600M at the box office, and yet will lose money for SPE? Shouldn't we question that strategy? Why are some studios making Hunger Games, Harry Potter, Twilight - and we are considering movies like Moneyball, Steve Jobs story, Captain Phillips Story, Evel Knievel story, etc. Are you aware that SPE only has 1 franchise - Spiderman. Yet, it took 5 years to generate a sequel? Spidey 3 was released in summer 2007, #4 in 2012. Don't harry potters come out over 2-3 years? Are you aware that SPE has only 1 franchise - Spidey? Yet we waited 5 years after Spidey 3 (2007) to release #4? Have you read the SEC annual report? Disney will make $300M on Spidey merchandise this year alone. We won't!
>>
>>82738908
>Disney will make $300M on Spidey merchandise this year alone. We won't!
I'm starting to feel a little bad for Sony.
>>
>>82738947
It kind of explains why they desperately needed to get Ghostbusters into production.
>>
>>82739057
Or they could make another Men in Black.
>>
>>82739174
Not just Men in Black but an MiB/21 Jump Street crossover.

That reminds me, who has the rights to MiB anyway? Wasn't it under Malibu which is owned by Marvel?
>>
>>82739197
Sony
>>
>>82739273
No no, I know they have the film rights, but it was originally a comic. Is the comic rights still owned by someone or did Sony outright buy it?
>>
>>82739312

Last I recall Marvel owned those rights when they purchased Malibu.
>>
>>82739312
I think the comic rights are currently at Marvel, since they bought out Malibu.
>>
>>82725415

> if Fox is shown making filler material just to fulfill the contract terms, they've gotta at least try to make a profitable film.


I'm no legal expert but given the box office performance of the last movie, which I haven't seen so I don't have a full opinion of, they might be able to make that case right now. That's that -- making filler -- is what they're doing.

Disney/Marvel probably just doesn't think it's worth the effort. But either way fans/customers aren't happy.
>>
>>82739409
>>82739421
Huh. Does Marvel get a cut from MiB?
>>
>>82728842
>The only thing they have is something they never wanted, deadpool.

Which is fucking hilarious considering the only reason it was so successful was that Reynolds was one stubborn motherfucker.
>>
>>82725591
Oversimplified the problem. Fox wanted a cheap director. They picked Trank and let him run with it. Trank was clear from the start what he wanted, and it was dark.

Trank being a noob cant control the super tight budget Fox wanted, and Fox throws a fit, and shits up the project even further.
>>
>>82737328
>>82737631
Yeah, I know that. It's pretty obvious it's spin. Just mentioning the obvious thing regarding the actors, even if it was true, why would they want to go back to that dumpster fire?
>>
>>82737659
Retarded enough to somehow make more money in a year from vomiting horrible ideas than you or I will make in our lifetimes.
>>
>>82730456
I like both of them as Spider-Man and would love to see them in a non-MCU movie together. Would never happen now, but would have been fun.
>>
My only problem with Marvel getting F4 back is that they wouldn't be able to do the coming of Galactus properly, as aliens have already come to Earth. Besides there'd be no reason for the Avengers not to help fight him.
>>
>>82738325
Only in the very narrow sense that they need Marvel's approval to undertake any exploitation of those rights.

The content and look of the show or movie is up to them, within the bounds set up by the contract - if it says original stories or departures from existing stories have to be OK'd, they have to be OK'd.

They don't literally need permission to make any show or movie, so long as they stick to the terms of their contract it's just a rubber-stamp process.
>>
>>82739642

probably, might be 0.5-3% of the profits, but they very likely do, that's how licensing deals work.
>>
>>82726168
>>82726189
ok what the hell was this guys problem?
was he not held enough as a child?
>>
Deadpool made bank and so will X-Men, Fox knows they got good money with FF they just need to give it to somebody who knows what the hell they're doing.
>>
If there are a movie how the sequel is a master piece and the first one is a bullshit?
>>
>>82741268
No. Because if a movie flops in the box office there is no reason to make a sequel. Unless it makes a shit tonne of money like Bayformers.
>>
>>82741739
>No. Because if a movie flops in the box office there is no reason to make a sequel. Unless it makes a shit tonne of money like Bayformers.

But Bayformers didn't flop at the box office.
>>
>>82741116
>they just need to give it to somebody who knows what the hell they're doing.
This, Deadpool did well cause it had people who cared about the source material so much that them and the fans kept pushing for it to happen over the years even if Fox was too stupid to notice and had little to no involvement with the making of it, why is it so difficult for Fox to find somebody who actually cares about the X-men and Fantastic 4 holy shit
>>
>>82725753
Sony makes me not want to have sex with my playstation anymore.
>>
>>82743511
It said 'Insert DISC', not-

Y'know what, never mind.
>>
File: 1319363703707.jpg (11KB, 252x221px) Image search: [Google]
1319363703707.jpg
11KB, 252x221px
>>82725950
>unironically using the term Millennialls
>>
>>82726699
But it's not terrible. Disjointed, poorly-developed villain, among the worst of the MCU. But saying "worst of the MCU" is like saying 'slowest supercar'. It's still a fun ride. Especially when compared to Fan4stic and ASM2.
>>
>>82743818
i disagree, but it is all subjective at the end of the day and literally nothing matters so why bother
>>
File: Woo concern.png (87KB, 346x249px) Image search: [Google]
Woo concern.png
87KB, 346x249px
>>82731638
>6/15 of those films got good reviews
So their batting average would be 40%. Jeez, that's bad.
>>
File: Smp8yEF.jpg (161KB, 1074x937px) Image search: [Google]
Smp8yEF.jpg
161KB, 1074x937px
>>82731638
I count 6-7 bad ones. People here are too critical.

>League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
>Elektra
>X-Men: The Last Stand
>Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
>X-Men Origins: Wolverine
>Fantastic Four (2015)
>Daredevil (just theatrical version, directors cut isn't awful)

And a lot these shortcomings were because of Tom Rothman.
>>82726168
>>82726189

Galactus concept art doesn't have him as a cloud. They probably ran out of budget.
>>
>>82735174
I love finding out about all these little details about the contracts, I never would have guessed they would need approval, that's ridiculous.
>>
>>82745123
For baseball,it's fantastic.
>>
>Johnny's actor in Black Panther

So much for that.
>>
>>82745641
I find it hysterical. He's the second Johnny Storm to jump ship to a better franchise
>>
File: image.jpg (6KB, 300x168px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
6KB, 300x168px
>>82745618
>it's fantastic
What did you just say?
>>
You ever just look at the movie landscape and think "Man...what a clusterfuck.
>>
>>82745850

All the damn time.

Hollywood just depresses me.
>>
>>82745813
Even for Ben he had it rough in this film
>>
>>82725053
It was a HUGE fucking flop. It made like 56 million dollars domestically when its budget was 120 million. After the taxes/advertisement on it's global take, I bet it didn't even take in 100 million worldwide.

And the reviews were horrible.

A sequel won't be made.
>>
>>82745850
>>82745918
Hollywood is really on unstable ground now. There's so much they're trying to push out that it's gonna crash the market. And I'm not just talking Cape films.
>>
>>82745970
Hell, I bet you none of the actors would even come back.
>>
>>82746032
The guy who said this is just taking a piss, literally. He's off his fucking rocker and out of his fucking mind.

They not only killed it, they fucking butchered it completely.
>>
>>82746032

Whatshername definitely won't. She hasn't even see the movie yet.
>>
>>82725512
That's because of the flash in the pan hype for 3D
>>
>>82745932
Yeah, he was Josh Tank's punching bag for this film.
>that scene when Ben is coming out of his rock cocoon and is scared of of his mind begging for help as his best friend runs away and hides for a year while Ben is used as a military weapon
>>
At this point Marvel can actually sue for artistic integrity. If they keep shitting out awful, horrible movies it is damaging the Marvel name/image legitimately.
>>
>>82746124
Marvel doesn't have to sue. They are killing the Fantastic Four off.

http://www.techtimes.com/articles/124498/20160114/marvel-confirms-the-fantastic-four-wont-have-a-comic-series-for-the-near-future.htm

They are destroying their name/letting the series and characters die while Fox keeps this horrible shit up. Fox won't have any releases or comics and Fantastic Four is going to die off even more. If they actually go through with a sequel, they are done.
>>
If only Deadpool didn't do so well...then FOX would be in hot water.
>>
>>82746153
I think he's arguing for Marvel to sue them to get the rights back.

>>82746223
And even that they tried sabotaging.
>>
>>82746379
>And even that they tried sabotaging.
How?
>>
>>82746520

By giving it an incredibly small budget, then chopping off another 7 million once production started.
>>
File: A_2e3156_2545090.jpg (91KB, 720x278px) Image search: [Google]
A_2e3156_2545090.jpg
91KB, 720x278px
>>82745618
>>
>>82746550
Yikes.
>>
>>82746520
Slashing it's budget mid-production.

I hope that the film-makers got a better deal out of it being a smaller movie, percentage-wise, so that FOX gets fucked.

It's like they thrive on cutting good things down.
>>
>>82725192
Why WAS the human torch black? Isn't he Sue's brother?
>>
>>82725916
It is kinda insane how well Marvel is able to handle their own characters. Its like Feige made a literal deal with the devil or something.
>>
>X-Men 1, decent
>X-Men 2, decent
>X-Men 3, awful

>Reboot time, with tons of random Wolverine movies

>First Class, decent
>Days of Future past, decent

>Apocalypse, going to be a SHITFEST

>Fantastic Four, horrible

They have made approximately 1 great film, 3 good films, and the rest horrible.

Fox needs to stop.
>>
>>82746640

Because Trank and the actor are friends from making Chronicle, and Trank hired him for only that reason, no matter how much he doesn't fit the character.
>>
>>82746747
Alright yeah I mean in-story though.
>>
>>82746640
They used the adoption route. And because they wren;t related her pining for him was okay in the same way it is in most japanese cartoons.
>>
>>82746577
Luckily for Deadpool, this turned out to be beneficial. The crew said that the budget cuts forced them to cut some characters which made for an overall tighter script. Ajax was supposed to have Garrison Kane, Wyre, and Sluggo as goons, but their roles were consolidated into Angel Dust. Not having the money for a planned huge gunfight at the end also gave them the idea to make a running gag where Deadpool forgets his duffel bag in the taxi.
>>
>>82746696
The problem isn't the mistakes themselves, it's the fact that they keep repeating:

Angel is dead, Jubille is a cameo, Scott gets sidelined.

Everybody keeps getting closer to getting their costumes/chairs/cueballs/permanent form, only to retract it in the last movie.

Beast has only been Beast for the third acts.

Also the production value has somehow gotten lower and lower. Mystique is the commonly mentioned one, but the drop from X3 Beast to the new one is fucking embarrassing. Looks like a CW/ABC makeup. Shit, the AoS Lash body-paint looks better than every paint-job from FOX, even if his wig and mask are shit.
>>
>>82746803
WOW.
Hahahaha they went for interracial pseudo incest?
>>
>>82746852
No, but I had you going there didn't I? Besides that would have been far too interesting. Instead we got Miles Teller and Mara awkwardly hooking up and having zero chemistry.
>>
>>82746965
Don't play with my innocent heart anon.
>>
>>82737783
that's what I was thinking. There's no way Marvel would let him be in both.

Or the alternative is that the Fan4stic 2 conversation is purely PR bullshit and it stands 0 chance of actually occurring so its not a problem
>>
>>82725053

It's not about the Fantastic 4 themselves it's about what they bring with them. Fox isn't stupid they know that they have Marvel by the balls here, that Marvel have nothing after Thanos. Marvel will be desperate to get their hands on Galactus, Doom or Kang. Cosmic Marvel is almost impossible to keep interesting without getting back the F4 rights.

They stand to make a lot of money here
>>
>>82747893
Galactus sucks and honestly after Infinity Wars I'd be surprised if Marvel could keep going.
>>
>>82725094
>not Fanta5tic
>>
>>82747893
Seems to be giving Fox too much credit. Marvel can easily stall by making solo films about other characters to set up some eventual major crossover fight against Galactus. As long as Fox refuse to give back F4, I doubt Marvel will have difficulty digging around for more relatively self-contained stories to play around with. Fox on the other hand, don't exactly have that many options beyond the same few sequels.
>>
>>82725053
Of course its still happening it. They won't allow Disney to have F4.
>>
are torch and invisigirl siblings in this?
>>
>>82747893
Uh huh. Sony thought Disney would give them 5 billion for Spider-Man. Fox's long con might not work so great if Apocalypse underperforms.
>>
>>82748114
step brother/sister
>>
>>82725853
Uh, dude, Ultimate Gwen Stacy is Ultimate Carnage
>>
>>82748093

Fox have the mutants. That gives them just as much movie potential as Marvel. Deadpool is going to print money for them for years. This isn't the same as Sony who only had Spider-Man
>>
>>82748349
see >>82725908
The comics had Frank Castle being turned Black by a plastic surgeon until the effects "wore off". Does it mean they should make a movie about that?
>>
>>82737659
Hasbro dude seems to know how to type.

He may still have a job.
>>
>>82725918
Man, where do you figure Tim Rothman will land and fuck up movies next? Paramount?
>>
>>82726269
Fuck off Boco.
>>
>>82748427
Not quite. Fox/X-men has been largely reliant on Bryan Singer. There's only so many times they can keep squeezing that. I'll give you Deadpool but again overall, they don't have as many options to run with in terms of doing well financially.
>>
File: 1461707859230.gif (290KB, 500x677px) Image search: [Google]
1461707859230.gif
290KB, 500x677px
>>82736182

>I get it if we bring the ponys into our world or something like smurfs

Is that why those movies keep getting made? The "Bring the cartoon character to the real world!" ones I mean

Because they're easy for the execs to grasp compared to real world building?
>>
>>82727990
I haven't watched either ASM through, but I caught a bit of the first one on TV once and it had the limpest, most lifeless score I think I may have ever heard in a movie.
>>
>>82737078

All Kate Mara ever wanted was to be a superhero and that will never really happen now.
>>
>>82737783

Nah they'll just replace him with Herbie! Magneto will appear and get beaten by a wooden gun. It'll be the greatest movie ever made.
>>
>>82748777
Yep, and they're easier to set up licensing deals for and product placement. Think about how hard it would have been to promote guitar hero in The Smurfs if the movie had been set in smurf village.
>>
>>82746550
Wow, Fox executives are a bunch of cocksuckers.
>>
>>82725072
His performance was worse in the few scenes I've bothered to watch, but mostly that's because of the awful script and directing for the whole movie. When he said "I AM smarter than you." to Doom, I thought the Reed Richards character came through well, but that's about it. These actors could probably do just fine with a director who isn't stoned out of his mind in this trailer. The problem is, I don't trust Fox to find a good director for this.
>>
>>82746695
Not really. Disney has everything to gain by making faithful(ish) adaptations - they can sell you books, toys, etc.

FOX and Sony can only get merchandise that directly relates to their films (which is why Perlmutter refused to licence any for Fan4stic and DOFP). Combine this with the usual coke-fueled arrogance and delusions of grandeur, and you end up with a piece of shit that some no-talent executive thinks is going to beat Marvel at their own game and redefine the character.
>>
>>82725635

Yeah... Sony is out of their fucking minds. Diz ain't paying more for Spider-man than they paid for Star Wars.
>>
>>82748801
Michael B Jordan signed on to Black Panther.

MCU now has both Foxtastic Torches.

Kate Mara still can remain hopeful. Adrienne Palicki bombed as Wonder Woman, but that didn't stop her from being Mockingbird.
>>
>>82749799
She was already in the MCU technically. I wonder if that counts
>>
>>82746574
How good did it feel to be able to post that comic in response to that comment anon? I bet it felt amazing.
>>
>>82749694

I could see them paying for it if they needed more than movie rights.

As it stands right now they lose out on the movie rights but toys, games, shirts, and more are all flowing towards the big D.
>>
>>82748025

That's why they moved back Inhumans. The next big bad(s) after Thanos will probably be the Celestials.
>>
>>82750518

Honestly I figured they ditched inhumans because no one was really into it.

GOTG wasn't the most successful book when they chose it but it was a fan-favorite title with potential to be a big hit.

Inhumans? There are very few people who aren't pushing it aside as X-Men-lite.

I think we'll be most likely to see it replaced with Masters of Evil or Thunderbolts due to the fact that it's a fan-favorite group and Deadpool and the positive public reaction towards Squad showing them that a villain-based title can work.

I think the problem with it however is the MCU has done a terrible job at setting up any minor villains. They're either trash or they kill them off. Zemo, and Loki are really all they have at the moment and while a movie about Zemo and his never before D-List friends might excite fans it's going to need a bigger character draw for the public.
>>
>>82750782
>GOTG wasn't the most successful book when they chose it but it was a fan-favorite title with potential to be a big hit.
Let's not pretend DnA GotG was anything like the movie
>>
>>82750840

I'm not.

The name itself however was enough for the fans to get excited when the film was announced. It's announcement convinced the comic readers Marvel actually cared about them.
Thread posts: 518
Thread images: 51


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.