Was this show good /co/?

>>82593636
It was fucking terrible.

Yep, literally better than anything "Comedy" Central is airing right now

It's fascinating how wrong the first reply always is.

>>82593801
The bar is set very low with being on Comedy Central.

It was fucking incredible.

It was a huge dissapointment

I loved it

It had room to grow.

The first couple of episodes were meh, but it got really good by the finale.

Much like retro synthwave, it held my attention for a week or two and I moved on.

>>82593636

Somewhat derivative, but I really liked the aesthetic and it had some really good vocal talent.

>>82593636
I dug the art style, but everything else was a straight up copy of Archer. Wish they pushed the whole synth pop/metal shtick more by having it more like a neon Blade Runner than a neon Miami Vice.

It took a bit to find it's footing but after the Bowling Animation episode it hit its' stride.
Honestly, it's a 7/10 show.

>>82594730
>>82594784
>>82594844
>>82594876
This.

They had a lot they could have pulled from; cyberpunk, 80s detective shlock, even 90s pre-transition silliness like TNMT. Instead they just tried to cash in on Archer being popular.

Kung Fury was great, this is just OK. We can learn from the reasons.

>>82594844
Anon, you should look up the art of patrick nagel right now. You might dig it