All these fucking sequals

Cash in on nostalgia

Next sequel to Police Academy when?

>>82435817
I've heard they've been wanting to do this for a while but I don't know why they haven't

>>82435755
>Why are they doing sequals to movies that haven't been around for almost 15 years?
WHY DO YOU ASK STUPID FUCKING QUESTIONS?
BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY CAN CASH IN ON PEOPLES' NOSTALGIA YOU FUCKING RETARD.
WHY DO YOU ASK STUPID FUCKING QUESTIONS?
BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY CAN CASH IN ON PEOPLES' NOSTALGIA YOU FUCKING RETARD.
WHY DO YOU ASK STUPID FUCKING QUESTIONS?
BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY CAN CASH IN ON PEOPLES' NOSTALGIA YOU FUCKING RETARD.

SERIOUSLY I'M FUCKING SICK OF PEOPLE ASKING OBVIOUS FUCKING IDIOTIC QUESTIONS

>>82435992
:(
That's mean anon. You don't have to be so mean.

File: 1444113222648.gif (2MB, 480x481px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 480x481px

>>82435992
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Somebody's on the rag.

File: looney_tunes_back_in_action_keyart.jpg (71KB, 270x405px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 270x405px

>>82435755
Space Jam 2 is being made to pander to nostalgic 90's kids and internet meme culture. That's it. Nothing else.

Pic related was their attempt at making a sequel and while it was a better movie overall, they still got a lot of things wrong and it bombed.

I have no idea how they think Space Jam 2 is going to make money because it's only going to appeal to a small group of people who were kids when the original came out. Anyone younger won't care, anyone older who were fans of Looney Tunes before then are going to hate it.

>>82436752
>it was a better movie overall
I watched it. No it wasn't. I also rewatched Space Jam a few months ago and it was just as fantastic.

>>82436752
>I have no idea how they think Space Jam 2 is going to make money
That's the thing, everybody acts like "cash in on nostalgia" is a surefire business practice and enough of a reason to justify those movies, but it fails at least as often as it succeeds.
I understand it looks low risk/high reward, but I'm not sure it actually is.

>>82435803
Actually, they do it because NEW ventures are extremely risky. Sequels as much safer by comparison.

>>82435981

They haven't been able to find a new running gag to replace the gay bar.

File: 1457716526793.png (214KB, 239x354px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 239x354px

>>82435755
>tfw Pixar ran out of ideas

>>82435755
they run out of ideas

How can a Space Jam 2 work?
The first movie came out 20 years ago during the peak of Michael Jordan's popularity. Not a single sport figure today is near as huge as he was in the 90's, not even LeBron.
Might as well make a movie about golf starting Tiger Woods.

>>82437980
>Might as well make a movie about golf starting Tiger Woods

Funny you should mention that...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mgsHgim4SJ4

>>82437980
>How can a Space Jam 2 work?

They're banking on epic memes.