Moore/Bolland 2016

Oh, is it out already? Guess I'll have to look for it so I can have an opinion after I've watched it.

>>81935523
I'm not hopeful.

Nice. So we maybe will get a close up of Gordon's cheeks

Doesn't really matter as long as they didn't purposely add things in to get the rating.

>>81935780
It's not out yet.

>>81935523

I've never been interested in try-hard grimdark Batman, I like "beating up silly-themed mobsters" Batman, so I'll skip it.

>>81936015
They totally did. Babs and/or Quinn

File: gaaay.png (907KB, 984x664px) Image search: [Google]

907KB, 984x664px

So, they gonna do it this time?

>>81936878
Babs had nudity in the source material. As long as they follow along that it won't be bad but if they add in extra shit then it might be dumb. I don't trust Timm at all to not fuck it up if he's adding in shit. That's a guy who needs a chain.

>>81936015
Some nudity?

Return of the Joker was PG-13, but I can't remember at what level the dirty language was.

File: batman the killing joke cr2.jpg (403KB, 835x870px) Image search: [Google]

403KB, 835x870px

>>81936015
They don't need to add anything.

>>81935523
Seems like the rating would clash with the visuals. They probably should have tried to replicate the colour schemes of the comic.

>>81935523
The animation will be subpar and the art bland and lifeless, but people will give it 10/10s for Conroy and Hamill reprising their roles .

File: Timm248.jpg (276KB, 751x1123px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 751x1123px

>>81940503
I will never understand this fascination with muted colors.

>>81940261
>They probably should have tried to replicate the colour schemes of the com

this bait was so good it cycled back to being too obvious

>>81935523
it will be shit but they will show a titty to set off a sjw/anti-sjw shitstorm to distract people from that fact. it will work.

Something something SJWs literally ruined the movie buzzwords something.