Thoughts on the relaunch of this obscure title?

a mistake unsurprisingly

At least it stops Krul from ruining something people actually like

>it's not a self aware parody of the original

what is even the point?

File: 300px-Into_the_trash_it_goes_card.jpg (30KB, 300x418px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 300x418px

>dat 90's Top Cow-tier art and character design

Looks like some right shite. Is it filled with Teenagers talking in their teen speak about all their new fangled dodads?

>>81656401

I always like to believe these types of threads are made by the creators who end up depressed at everyone hating or laughing at their shit

>>81656401
>cbr watermark
kek, is this printed on all new webcomics?

File: bloodlines1[1].jpg (281KB, 920x1400px) Image search: [Google]

281KB, 920x1400px

>>81658469
OP image with not only no watermark but also a little higher-res

>>81659553
It seems like the original xmen with a harry potter lookalike in the mist

Any particular reason why the art is so archaic?

>>81656401
One last mistake before Rebirth!

>>81656401
HIT MAN SEQUEL

GET HYPE

>>81659598
They want the 90s nostalgiafag audience.

>>81659553
Jim Lee new x-men book?

>>81656401
That relaunch is a mini though