Talking Tom & Friends

>>81553343
> It got a staggering ZERO replies
It's Talking Tom & Friends, what did you expect?

>>81553343
>The female cat is the only one wearing clothes

Why is this sexism allowed?

File: 1.png (479KB, 1059x525px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1059x525px

>>81553652
She used to be naked all of the time, but the character got a lot of extra attention when that hoax happened and they started giving her clothes.

>>81553714
What hoax?

File: Samurai.png (238KB, 368x480px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 368x480px

>>81553343

This isn't Tom and Jerry Tom right?

>>81553714
Post the socks.

File: 1458108563872.png (529KB, 1280x670px) Image search: [Google]

529KB, 1280x670px

>>81553734
She had an app where you could talk to her. She would often use sexual innuendo while in "adult" mode and came off as very flirty. Somebody decided to do the old "cleverbot is actually human" thing and say Angela was being controlled by pedophiles who were using the app to stalk kids.

It was all garbage, of course, but you can still see accusations pop up because people are gullible.

Wait what the fuck is this. Wasn't this just some shitty phone app that came out years ago? Why is it a TV show?

File: talking-angela.png (752KB, 576x576px) Image search: [Google]

752KB, 576x576px

>>81553810
They toned down the innuendo after that and gave her clothes.

File: 1454473036960.jpg (21KB, 227x206px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 227x206px

>>81553810
Pedophiles really are thought of as some sort of Legion of Doom by normies and idiots aren't they?

>>81553974
It's technically a YouTube show. They made a television "quality" cartoon and industry voice actors, full length, but decided to release the episodes on YouTube. The episodes get millions of views. The first episode's been viewed 32,464,144 times. That's just one episode.

File: 2.jpg (82KB, 700x468px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 700x468px

They knew what they were doing back in 2014. They wanted people to lust after her. I wonder where her character would be if they were allowed to continue unimpeded.

>>81554034
Holy shit, how the hell does an app get this popular

File: 3.jpg (38KB, 700x396px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 700x396px

>>81554151
Of course, none of these are really quality images. They literally have the same five-or-six poses for Angela that they keep copying and pasting into various pictures. Sometimes, they'll photoshop in an outfit or a hat, but you can usually tell it's not supposed to be there. It's rare for them to make something new.

File: 4.jpg (28KB, 700x465px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 700x465px

Last of the old stuff I'm posting. I'll post some of the newer stuff to see how more conservative they are.

File: 12472758_1171972376147136_5080670729680246304_n.png (471KB, 700x464px) Image search: [Google]

471KB, 700x464px

This is what they posted on Easter.

File: 12512625_1131444756866565_4319918084868572743_n.png (168KB, 700x464px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 700x464px

They posted her in this pose without clothes many times, but now she's always fully dressed.

File: 5.jpg (80KB, 700x464px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 700x464px

New version of this pose.

File: 6.jpg (39KB, 700x424px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 700x424px

>>81554422
Old version of this pose.

File: 1656226_745684395442605_1438841256_n.jpg (110KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 960x960px

>>81554422 (You)
>>81554432 (You)
It's a pretty shit pose to begin with. Her head is not on her body right and it's turned at an impossible angle. But they shouldn't be running away from their original values.

>>81554009

If you live in the UK, the pedophile cult is a real thing

File: 1458107471276.jpg (69KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1280x720px

One last bump.

>>81553343
No one gives a fuck about Tom. Post cat waifu, Angela.

File: 1445977286572.jpg (67KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1280x720px

>>81560505
She's not very cute in the show.

File: Muh_wut.png (49KB, 200x132px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 200x132px

>>81553343
Is this any good? I'm incredibly skeptical of a shitty talking app producing quality animation and even more skeptical of them producing quality plot/humor.

>>81554171
Little kids love it. You give Tom or Angela app to a little kid and they play that shit for hours

>>81562182
It's mostly mediocre. Sometimes, there will be a joke that actually gets a chuckle out of me, but you know what they say about chimpanzees and typewriters.

From a news article released today.

>Apps in the Talking Tom and Friends franchise have been downloaded more than 3.6 billion times. In the past six years, users have spent 945,000 years playing in Talking Tom apps, and have knocked him down over 191 billion times.

Why are these so popular?

>The thread I made for last week's episode really outdid itself.
>It got a staggering ZERO replies.

>ZERO
>STAGGERING

hahahaha Jesus what a cuck fag

>>81568519
I think you might have missed a joke there.

File: Paedofinder General.jpg (101KB, 400x630px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 400x630px

>>81554009
Yes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCywGhHQMEw

bump

i really admire op's dedication