>Implying you wouldn't do someone with this face

>>78482380
Anyone would do that

>>78482380
People love those faces.

>>78482380
I'd put them in the trash where they belong

File: Jesus Christ, how horrifying.png (1MB, 718x861px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 718x861px

Only a few ones (notably Anastasia) are not doing the DreamWorks face in Fox's re-releases of their animated and live-action/CGI-hybrid films.
Keep in mind that Fox now distributes DreamWorks' animated films.

>>78482380
literally the selling point

>>78484309
But how can they be trash if they're so quality?

File: yee.png (164KB, 419x403px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 419x403px

What is it with DreamWorks having hotter female characters than Disney and Pixar

and with so little porn too

>https://i.imgur.com/q7eFrnW.jpg
>https://i.imgur.com/X9HMipr.jpg

Case anyone was interested I drew some Over the Hedge Porn.

>>78482380
Yeah, I wouldn't

>>78482380
Can someone explain this, is the "raised eyebrow smug look" related to something comedic in nature?

>>78485186
>Garfield
>Marmaduke
>Thumbelina
>Everyone's Hero
>Space Chimps
>Walking with Dinosaurs
Why the fuck did they rerelease these?

>>78485878
my understanding is it's used to break up the symmetry to avoid the Uncanny Valley.

But that just created the problem of the Uncanny Sameface.

>>78485186

Many of these faces aren't smug at all, they're just enthralled, like :D

File: 1300044776986.jpg (17KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 250x250px

The only time you pull this face in real life is when you're being smugly condescending and questioning your opposite's intelligence.

>>78482380
fine OP, i'll admit i'd fuck Megamind, if that's what you want