Never really watched it as a kid, as more into Tiny Toons. I've

Good: it's often clever and well-written.
Bad: it's full of dated celebrity name drops that were tacky even when they weren't dated.

It's a bit hit-and-miss overall, but it's got its moments. Such as this obligatory one:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lNJ6dFwh8a4

>What makes it good?
Slappy and Skippy

>>78420393
If pop culture refs are one of the major flaws, it seems worth a watch. That's not even that bad.

>>78420399
Guess I'll check out an episode with them in it.
Any recommendations? Or just start from 001?

File: Giraffe maid.png (1MB, 1366x1190px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1366x1190px

What makes it good? This.

>>78420444
>muh yiff fantasies
fuck off

File: b2947864fb73_sf_3.jpg (32KB, 720x480px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 720x480px

Made me want to jump off or toss TV off 14th floor balcony.

RIP tv

>>78420346

Looking back after watching it on The Hub, it was a lot more of a mixed bag than I realized as a kid.

The Warners themselves were hit or miss and only a few of the backup segments were any good. The Pinky and the Brain, Rita and Runt, and Slappy were usually pretty solid.

A lot of them were just a joke stretched way too thin like Katie Kaboom, the rambling kid, and Goodfeathers. Especially Goodfeathers, which is a single, not particularly funny joke that has to carry numerous six minute shorts.

Some of them like the Hip Hippos and Mindy and Buttons were just excruciating to watch.

>>78420346
Freakazoid was better so...

Watch it instead.

>>78420430
It's a sketch comedy, you can start from any point and lose nothing. Continuity is meaningless here.

>>78420393
That and it's unclever and crass about as often as its clever.

>>78420430
The humor can also be very repetitive. Be ready to have the exact same joke based on an outdated reference in every one of the 99 episodes.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Izlj01JDZs