Boobsocks

>>78180546
>pervy
The word is "heterosexual", you faggot

Did you make this thread expecting to get an actual answer to your dumbass question?

all women should leave /co/ desu

>>78180568
Being straight doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to show boobs even when it doesn't make sense from an art or story or fabric or design perspective.

I personally like blowjobs. I also write. Everything I write does not revolve around blowjobs.

>>78180582
Well; it's comics, full of weird stuff, Perhaps the outfits do have molded breast pouches.

File: fath.jpg (64KB, 435x580px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 435x580px

maybe this comic is more your speed

>>78180617
>it doesn't make sense from an art or story or fabric or design perspective.


WHO FUCKING GIVES A SHIT? IT'S SUPERHERO COMICS

Time-traveling alien demons and crazy fucking shit, but you get hung up on whether a suit makes sense or not

For fuck sake

>>78180617
>Being straight doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to show boobs even when it doesn't make sense from an art or story or fabric or design perspective.
But it means you can.

>>78180617
I'd buy your books if it included more blowjobs

I liek boobies

>>78180546
>but like in super hero world do outfits just have holes for humongous tiitays?

What?

When I was young I remember watching Teen Titans and being confused by Raven's boobs. At the time I legitimately wondered if there outfits for womens that had boobsocks. I had no idea that anyone else got that impression and figured I was just dumb.

>>78180546
Don't you have cocks to suck, Linkara?

File: 1438745344330.jpg (260KB, 495x720px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 495x720px

JESUS FUCK

Does this really need to be explained?

/co/ has never seen a woman in a tight top before?

I tough they were intended to avoid tits to bounce all around during fights, like a sport braintegrated into the suit

>>78181039
A woman with a top that tight would have to have it sewn closed around her. Not that I agree with OP but yeah.

>>78181039

...lewd

>>78181096

You're trying to apply real life logic to comic books fantasy universe

you should stop

>>78180546
Cape comic costumes are just the naked body with clothes colored on. It's tradition, and it's fine. There end.

>>78180603
ha, no. You fucking get out, we can just make more men

File: 1449519547004.jpg (2MB, 2407x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2407x3000px

>>78180546
Nah, it's more that often in Marvel and DC superhero books the costumes are less literal and more conceptual and if there is no previous story logic stated about how the costumes work or what materials they are made of it's carte blanch to interpret as whatever.

IRL it can be a feature in tailored latex stuff.

>>78181175
So did >>78181039. And it's literally what the thread is about sooooo.

>>78181039
Uhh no, I'm not a normie so why would I have?

> pervy
Factually inaccurate...
Pervert... implying perverse... implying unnatural...
Their is NOTHING unnatural about straight human sexuality...
level of subtley doesn't change this.

>>78181475
>NOTHING unnatural
Newsflash, the boobs in the OP does not actually look natural in any way, that's what the thread is about. Go read new Starfire if you want to see boobs looking natural and behaving like they should in different situations.

>>78181581
Starfire's boob physics are truly an underrated part of the run. I guess reviewers are afraid to credit Lupa there since they'd get shit for focusing on it.

>>78181624
Muhsogginy for observing that a woman has breasts

The costumes are just body paint.

>>78181293
>Pussy zippers

>>78181581
They are a exaggerated that doesn't change the fact that it is not perverse in ANYWAY to enjoy it visually.

It always seems odd when clothes look painted on. I guess it's easier to draw.

>>78180617
Look at this faggot, thinking cape comics should care about having everything make sense. You're an idiot. Comic books always have idealized body types for men and women. It comes with the fantasy genre.

>>78181764
Didn't you know SJWs are rampant sex shamers towards men?

>>78181853

I didn't know this

I don't go to /pol/ and I'm not concerned with their grievances

File: 1449857425290.jpg (113KB, 982x914px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 982x914px

>>78180546
>pervy
/co/mblr please go.

>>78181581
>>78181624
Now you could do something productive for once, post examples of this and save this terrible thread.

>>78181240
how?

>>78180546
>>78181293
>>78181039
The thing is, to get a shirt to conform all the way around the breast, including dipping all the way between to meet the torso, and form them into neat little spheres like that, it has to be tailored as outright push-up cups. 'Socks' or 'sausage casings', as it were. If it's just a flat layer overtop it would pull taut at some point between, and if you pulled it tighter, it would crush the breast back against the ribcage.

Of course, IF she had a suit made to be that tight, while still thick enough to suppress more intimate details, it'd probably double as supportive wear. In which case she's basically wearing a full-body bra to keep everything in place while she's leaping rooftop to rooftop.

>>78180546
Eschergirls pls go

Honestly don't understand people who try to apply real world logic to something from fantasy.
Of course superheroes have unrealistic costumes, they are unrealistic period.

Unless you know some real life people who have superpowers

>>78181175
Are you blind, look at the post I was replying to. His argument was 'this could happen in real life and is even quite common.'

File: 1437946616935.gif (208KB, 323x221px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 323x221px

This thread,not a genuine reply in the whole thing. I only came cause I thought it said Boondocks.

File: irltithuggers.jpg (63KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 640x480px

>>78182942

>>78182546
>this detail in a fantasy book isn't realistic

>>78185278
And just like that, thread gets BTFO.

>>78185364
I wonder how many men with every crease in their pecs, though their outdoor underwear, OP had to pass without giving it a single thought, or dismissing it, outright.(or if the dick threads are any indication, masturbating to it)

>>78180546
>boobsocks

For fucks sake, not all of us read TheMarySue. We don't know all your stupid made up words.

>>78180546
>artists being lazy and/or pervy
More like the have never seen a boob irl before

>>78187213
Even the ones who are married or women?

File: 9038-superman-superman-flying.jpg (63KB, 513x850px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 513x850px

>>78180546
Superhero costumes are pretty much just body paint that inexplicably obscures the genitals. If a costume can shrinkrwrap around a dude's fucking obliques, why can't a costume shrinkwrap around a chick's tits? Is it realistic? Of course not, but superheroes are meant to be a fantasy.

>>78187337
Especially them

>>78180546
You know that those "boobsocks" are what gymnastics use?

>>78187607
leotards aren't that tight, and they probably wear sports bras under those.

>>78187507
Yeah this. It's just that most artists are not able to draw properly draped clothing on a monthly comics schedule so they draw a naked body and just have the colorist fill it in as if it's clothing. I don't understand why it's a big deal or even really a problem. It's about as productive as complaining about sameface.

I do give credit to artists who can manage to avoid these problems, but it's kind of just the nature of the beast.

>>78187607
What are you talking about? I think complaining about boobsocks is stupid because like >>78187507 said, costumes in comics are basically just body paint, but that's not true. Go look at some gymnasts, all their leotards compress everything.

File: 51WDNTB40GL._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg (23KB, 229x346px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 229x346px

Purely from an aesthetic point of view, I always thought that the more realistic spandex without the "vacuum-sealed" appearance just looks better.

>>78180546
Here's how drawing comics works: you draw the geometric forms that make up the human body, then you refine the form, then you add detail. Suddenly:
>Oh, shit, I need to produce 22 pages a month and I am a human being that requires sleep and I also like to do other things in life beyond being a slave to the pencil?
>oh it takes extra time to accurately work out and refine how breasts and other soft tissues would roll over the torso and look natural in fabrics that mirror the real world?
>wait, 99% of the readership won't even really care about all that and just want generic sex appeal?
>fuck it, every woman gets beachballs on their chests

So am I the only one who finds realistic breast physics more arousing than boobsocks? Those things never do anything for me.

Might also be that I like flatter chests

>>78187737
Yeah compress is the key word here, the costume in op doesn't have the chest compressed at all. No Gymnast's leotards leave breast impressions that big. It is body paint.

>>78188655
Or, given that there's no visible nipples there, it's a costume with parts designed to support the breasts exactly like in >>78185278

>>78180546
Two Cirque du Solei latex fetishists and two masked 90's alt rock musicians are rappelling down a hole in the ceiling with their pet trained squirrel and the fact that one of them has boob socks is the part you have trouble with?

File: real world boob pockets.jpg (53KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 500x750px

>>78180546
>In-universe, what exactly ARE boobsocks

Pouches built into the costume that hold the breasts. There's nothing physically impossible about them, and they look so hot that I wonder why they haven't become a real world fashion item.

>>78189551
Real boobs wouldn't be flattered by them unless they come with support

File: 1377778811_marvel-civil-war-spiderman-4986-hd-wallpapers-amazing-spider-man-carnage-civil-war-new-avengers-my-cinematic-universe-the-amazin.jpg (448KB, 1669x720px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1669x720px

>>78180546
They're just artists who don't know how or want to draw proper fabric.
You'll notice that men have "boobsocks" too as well as costumes that contour to every single bit of muscle they have to a vascular degree.

>>78187819
based Cooke

Un
Stable
Molecules.

>>78181233
Why did the thread continue after this post?

File: 1446753285798.png (198KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 500x375px

>>78180758

>>78180546
I like looking at sexy girls when reading my comics as much as the next guys.
But the body paint is just terrible

>>78180617
>Being straight doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to show boobs
Clearly, you've never been straight before.