[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

How's Your Webcomic? #219

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 544
Thread images: 83

File: 1449786938311[1].jpg (398KB, 750x749px) Image search: [Google]
1449786938311[1].jpg
398KB, 750x749px
Because Nobody Else Wants to Start One Edition

>Post ideas, art, comics you've done
>Share your website/portfolio
>Ask for critique, information, or advice on writing or drawing
>Practice
>Practice Practicing

Special Guest Activity:
Draw a picture or mini comic of one of your characters sitting on Santa's lap and being a nuisance to him.
>>
File: 1449795602564[1].png (816KB, 612x792px) Image search: [Google]
1449795602564[1].png
816KB, 612x792px
>>78137430

Scrub Authors GOODIE Bag

Here’s a short list of sites that any new webcomic artist or writer will find handy:

>*-Struggling to find that perfect FONT? Create your own using this link;
http://www.myscriptfont.com/

>*-Don’t forget to brush up on that ANATOMY:
http://artists.pixelovely.com/practice-tools/figure-drawing/
http://www.quickposes.com/pages/timed

>*-What’s a list without some reference STOCK IMAGES?
People: http://senshistock.deviantart.com/gallery/
Scenery: http://www.shutterstock.com/

>*-Here's a big fat compilation of CHARACTER DESIGN REFERENCE:
http://www.pinterest.com/characterdesigh/

>*-Finally, here are some links to get a rough WEBSITE started up:
Easy to use tumblr webcomic theme: https://www.tumblr.com/theme/39018
Do’s and Don’ts for starting a site: http://pastebin.com/kNR2W5mV

>*-Here’s the contact sheet if anyone wants to put information down, like their site and webcomic:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uwfOSHXfrgvcf--PkPz9jXL6p5RqIsrYvXYwgQpgT3k/edit#

>*-We also got a SKYPE CHAT room going on,
To join the chat, seek out 'scribblehatch' or 'starlinemike' and they'll add you in.

Wise words from John Cleese:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qby0ed4aVpo [Embed]

Invisible Ink:
http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse456/07su/administrative/invisible_ink_part_1.pdf
http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse456/07su/administrative/invisible_ink_part_2.pdf
http://courses.cs.washington.edu/courses/cse456/07su/administrative/invisible_ink_part_3.pdf

Paper Wings
http://chrisoatley.com/category/podcasts/
https://web.archive.org/web/20140625035030/http://paperwingspodcast.com/
>>
File: 1449787650496[1].png (56KB, 426x409px) Image search: [Google]
1449787650496[1].png
56KB, 426x409px
>>78137462

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNV41l88gfY

This is what you get for making me do this again.
>>
>>78137430

You know what I want for Christmas?

A good story.
>>
>>78137430
shit we had a lot of good activities last time and nobody did 'em. i pert near forgot they existed, what with the long break
>>
File: page 14 final 980px.png (1MB, 980x1517px) Image search: [Google]
page 14 final 980px.png
1MB, 980x1517px
Reposting today's page in case anybody missed it. What do you guys think?
>>
File: When vidyas play you.jpg (4MB, 2550x3300px) Image search: [Google]
When vidyas play you.jpg
4MB, 2550x3300px
>>
>>78138295
that fourth panel
those video titles
top notch yo
>>
File: Links_drawing[1].jpg (26KB, 249x174px) Image search: [Google]
Links_drawing[1].jpg
26KB, 249x174px
>>78138295
>>78138357
also.... wait.. that second panel
is that...
>>
File: dog-eyebrows.png (379KB, 533x533px)
dog-eyebrows.png
379KB, 533x533px
>Deviants is still the biggest draw and spikes on update days but dies down considerably through the rest of the week
>Super Sexy pulls in half the number of people on update days compared to Deviants but keeps a more consistent number of visitors for the rest of the week
>Super Sexy is going to stop updating in a couple weeks

SS has been getting more and more popular. Seems I underestimated how popular it'd get on its own. Oh well, if I need to I might go back to it but for now I'm still going to focus on Deviants.
>>
File: p129.png (204KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
p129.png
204KB, 1000x1000px
belongingtonobody.tumblr.com
>>
>>78139448
is.. is that a spooky alien face
>>
Do your best tho
>>
>>78139653
yup
>>
>>78139358
You're always gonna get those spikes on update days compared to the rest of the week. Most people don't bother going to a comic's site that they know hasn't updated yet unless the update is late or there's an indefinite hiatus.
>>
>>78140112
awesome
and extra spookles because iirc that ship is rrl big based on other shots. did not expect it to be a single-seater
>>
God damn, drawing with a cold sucks ass.
>>
3-page update which closes out Chapter 4. this guy's hat is making less and less sense as i draw it.

http://luckyhazard.thecomicseries.com/comics/46
>>
File: S1E23.png (477KB, 900x850px)
S1E23.png
477KB, 900x850px
Update time!
http://amonguscomic.com/comic/blocking-it-out/
http://amonguscomic.tumblr.com/post/135094291570/update-read-this-comic-at
>>
>>78142977
een soviet outer space, cats eat alf!
funny shit, i like how i was analyzing the backtround of the bottom left panel as you knew i would, and while i was pondering how anyone can stand to cover over something they worked hard on writing, the last bit kicked in and i got a secondary smile
>>78142053
404, m8
>>
>>78143145
try this?
luckyhazard.thecomicseries.com
>>
I started drawing my comic as a parody of itself because I just wanted to throw the story out there, but now I'm 50 pages in and I'm starting to take it more seriously. Should I continue through the comic at the current pace I'm going and fix the beginning later, or stop now, go back, and redo it all to be consistent and well-written?
>>
How do you guys handle fight scenes?

Do you do one page at a time, or dump every page at once?
>>
>>78143145

I actually saved that wall of text in case anybody wanted it, haha.
>>
>>78143623
shit that's a tough one. i wanna say there have been things in the past that started out as parodies and slowly became something greater. Kinda like Nadesico? Except that was more of a deconstruction-reconstruction.
i say, depending on the story, give a meta-reason for things to change. for all that it sucked kind of, shortpacked "pulling the drama tab" was a clever way to address its slight cerebus syndrome (i feel dirty using all those tropenames but they're so damned useful)
>>78143479
no dice
>>78144332
I think I get the gist of it now
>>78144148
I prefer fights to get dumped as one or two big updates, but I realize that puts unfair strain on their inclusion
>>
>>78144148
What you mean by 'handle' them? Writing (script), composing (storyboad), drawing or uploading?
>>
>>78144475
Uploading
>>
Man, my hands are hurting because of the stress and drawings.

It is really affecting my art.
>>
>>78144624
Personally I would upload them at regular schedule. If your comic has a lot of fights going on, i'd consider 2 week or monthly uploads with a chunk of pages at once, or, better even a chapter.
>>
>>78144400
dunno what to tell you then man. sorry
>>
>>78144721
In my webcomic, most of the fights are kind of like "boss fights". With little fights sprinkled in between.
>>
Anybody know how to used gimp or should i used another art program?
>>
>>78145017
I use Paint tool Sai religiously.
>>
>>78145046

It is on PC.

Or are you from the mac?
>>
>>78145082
It's on PC. It might be on mac as well, I have no idea.
>>
>>78145189

Hey, What is your web comic?
>>
File: beginningmiddlecurrent.png (271KB, 901x513px) Image search: [Google]
beginningmiddlecurrent.png
271KB, 901x513px
>>78144400
It kind of already happened? The shift started when the Plot started going down and even then it was kind of "this is stupid but hey here's what would happen," and now I want to turn it around to be better than it is. I still have a long way to go artwise but it's a start.
>>
>>78144891
oh hey it's working now
>>
>>78144695
gotta rest, man. take it from the creator of Sybil. You can't push this shit. it will go from 'really affecting your art' to really STOPPING your art. Like, semi-permanently.
>>
>>78145017
the plurality of reccommendations in these threads point to mangastudio/clipstudio as the best compromise of all you could want from a program, including price, versatility, stabilizer, tools, and required processing power (though one person recently did report it was a memory hog for them, most say the opposite). Its main drawback is the painting ability isnt as good as photoshop, from reports.
>>
>>78145294
Ennui GO!

http://ennuigo.smackjeeves.com/comics/

The brush size fidelity in Sai feels a lot better to me than Photoshop. Although I use Photoshop to add text, since Sai doesn't do that.
>>
>>78145421
ants i tell you
i like this art. can you summarize what happened that changed in terms of seriousness? because i'm curious, and this is something worth studying.
my comic has gotten slightly more serious over time but only in a 'different sort of humor' way, I think. in the way that sealab is different from frisky dingo which is in turn different from archer.

in any case, go ahead and run with it as-is. No need to redo the old stuff, but someday once it's all complete, feel free to sort of do a 'dragon ball kai' of it.. or to use a different metaphor, a 'version of the hobbit we're all aware of as opposed to the original'
>>
>>78145601

Fuck...I know this is dumbass question and you probably going say "Google it".

But, Where do you download it?
>>
File: bbbbb11.png (659KB, 905x1546px) Image search: [Google]
bbbbb11.png
659KB, 905x1546px
>>78145636
Yeah the image is a lot smaller than I thought idk why sorry.
As far as what changed, the first major plot point where someone dies happened, and that's what causes the whole story to go off. At first all the characters were reduced to their basic personality traits (loser, stoner, psychopath, the Girl etc), but now I'm at the very beginning of fleshing them out in story, slipping in exposition, etc.
>>
>>78145721
Yeah, literally google it. It's like the first result.

There is a beta for Sai 2 as well, which is gonna have a lot more features, but its kind of a clunky demo so far.
>>
>>78145448
ah glad to hear it!
>>
>>78138063
Ah man this is so close to looking really really good. But those gradients with the soft smudges are kind of driving me nuts.

I wish I had a less aggressive way of saying it too.
>>
>>78145881

Thanks for the tips.

Sorry for asking dumb ass questions.
>>
I actually JUST finished the three page origin story for a character I created - Tether Wing. Here's the first page. You can read the other two at http://drewmaru.deviantart.com/gallery/
>>
>>78145878
Yeah I don't think there'll be any problem with this. At most you might want to put up a guide on your site saying "hey nothing much happens til ___ so you can just enjoy the ride or skip to the plot bit or whatever"
>>
>>78146081
hmm. one of the more legit excuses for a gender bender hero. not remotely up my alley, but not bad at all. none of the cringe you'd expect. aaand pretty decent superhero premise too.. though I hope the witch that cursed him remains part of the story, because otherwise it's like.. why isnt she making tons of these
>>
>>78145421
>>78145878
Sorry man, but the unoriginal artstyle is so off putting i can't and wouldn't be able to get into it unless it had an amazing story and characters. Character look generic and rip-off's. (you know what i mean.) The ideas there
>>
>>78146081

You have my attention
>>
>>78147510
I'm not sure what you mean by rip-offs, but I agree, my artstyle sucks balls. I'll try to develop it more.
>>
>>78147796
I thought it was cute. And while it's not original at all, it is very well done for what it is. Reminds me of kind of a pleasant hybrid of prussian moose's style and monica ray's Either way it's expressive as fuck and gets the job hella done.
>>
how does one handle the pressures of time vs. quality
>>
>>78140143

Yeah but it looks like SS actually has a consistent turnout and it is gaining popularity while Deviants is just netting a chunk of views one day a week.

Despite my interest in /ss/ I didn't really care much about that story. It was just a boy being pressured and molested into having sex. I would've eventually got around to doing a story. Goes to show how good a fetish is.

Maybe people wil like the extra light bondage and slight mind control that Deviants will offer. Not even my fetish but it's subtle and fits the narrative.
>>
>>78148878

Pacing. Don't rush it but don't stay on thing for too long. Know when to move and if need be fix afterwards when you have spare time.
>>
How many people here are writing a webcomic with an overarching story? Beginning, middle, and end?
>>
>>78148878
pretend you have less time than you really do.
then, when you're finished on "time", you have the option to either go back and touch things up some more, or forge on ahead.
doing good work in a short amount of time is an invaluable skill, and it's not something you can learn just by being good at drawing or having lots of time.
>>
>>78146081
If genderbending is the main focus here what makes it any different from any other 2015 comic being diverse and open minded?
>>
>>78147028
>>78147614
Thanks. Yeah, she would be a major character. As I said, in pages' descriptions, I would only really consider continuing this if it got enough attention. My main focus is my comic, Spirit Legends, which takes up most of my free time as it is my passion project, so it would probably take a lot fan interest to make me consider creating a series out of it. Or hey, if a comic company wanted to pick it up, I'd love to work on it so I could quit my job and focus on comics.
>>
File: Page 3 - Final for Web.jpg (265KB, 600x916px) Image search: [Google]
Page 3 - Final for Web.jpg
265KB, 600x916px
>>78149050
I'm not sure what the others have to offer, but I know I would plan for the interactions int he sorority house and keeping the secret, plus its not a genderbend. He's a feminine looking guy with the outfit having what looks like breasts. It's still a guy even after activating the powers. I have ideas for what exactly the power is, who else gets similar powers, some rivals, and not TOO much else that I'd want to go into detail on in case anyone decides to steal the ideas or something lol

I'd hate to say "tell everyone about it because i wont work on it unless i get enough attention". that's not the plan. i just dont have any immediate plans to continue it just yet. it was based on a crazy dram i had and i wanted to share an adaptation of my crazy dream, but if i had enough people wanting more then i'd probably be excited enough to continue it.
>>
>>78138063
I like everything so far as always, but:
-the fight scene is dragging a little because so many movements are expressed with multiple pictures (like the undercut to the chin). In a fight scene, it is challenging to maintain suspense and one important tool for that is pacing. Fast turns here and there keeps the reader alert for the unexpected. The strike to the chin could have worked as a "sentence interrupted by a punch" -moment much better if done with only one or two pictures, so the reader doesn't have too much time to expect it (or at least underline how sudden attack was and why the antagonist had no time to react.)

-the dialogue is clearly intentionally cliche and I don't mind it, but I think the narration is unnecessary if it doesn't add anything we don't already see.

Overall however this comic is wonderful.
>>
>>78138295
I forgot it was a KICK to the chin, my bad.
>>
>>78149376 this was meant for
>>78149368
>>
>>78149169
>>78149208

In reminded of Shezow and what it could be. Is attention all you need? Sorry I'm on my phone right now so I can't look at everything just yet.
>>
>>78149459
Well, i mean i need a bunch of people to be interested. like a fanbase. its tough enough to be motivated to even work on my passion project. i can't imagine picking up a second seris to work on two with no fanbase. why, can you help? if u know anything then feel free to shoot me an email at [email protected]
>>
>>78149578

I'm not super famous but I could help spread the word. I will have to say that I run an NSFW websit but I have interests outside of that.

Your comic can get a fan base that's into traps. I could help with writing or art as a second set of eyes. If you are interested let me know and I can shoot you an email.
>>
>>78149677
Sure I'd love to talk more about it!
>>
>>78149702

Sent!
>>
>>78144695
This might sound weird but take tumeric pills if you can afford it. I have tendonitis is both my thumbs and it was the only thing to stop the pain.
>>
>>78149758
Thanks! I noticed the email, but it's almost 7am where I am and I have work in a few hours so I'll respond as soon as I can. I'm curious though if you think you can only help if it's NSFW. I want planning on pushing it to adults only, but I was contemplating making it mature
>>
>>78149860

It doesn't have to be xxx. It could be cheesecake and I would recommend that. Anything more than that is fine by me.

Happy to hear from you soon.
>>
>>78149907
Cool thanks! I'll try to respond after work if I don't pass out. Otherwise I'll respond ASAP. Good night! :D
>>
>>78146081
You are quite literally the worst.
>>
>>78137502
>dont reply to bones
who?
>>
>>78147028
There's no such thing as a "legit excuse" for that fetish. It's a fetish. If you need an excuse you're doing it wrong.

Also it's crossdressing.
>>
File: 53.png (1MB, 1200x1700px) Image search: [Google]
53.png
1MB, 1200x1700px
And page done.

So is anybody doing any Christmas special stuff related with their webcomics?
>>
>>78150578
If he can fit it in between drawing pages, my artist is going to do a Christmas pic and put it on his Tumblr.
>>
>>78150578
>pickel
>>
File: aterribleidea.png (115KB, 850x550px) Image search: [Google]
aterribleidea.png
115KB, 850x550px
>>78150659
fuck. there's always one fuck up every time.
thanks!
>>
>>78145540
>[Manga Studio's] main drawback is the painting ability isnt as good as photoshop, from reports.

While this was certainly true of MS4, it's a hell of a lot better in MS5.

For those on a budget, both MediBang Paint and the virtually identical FireAlpaca are free, and have tools specifically for making comics with.
>>
>>78150578
I'm busy on a christmas flash.
>>
>>78151537
If it doesn't involve Annabeth I won't watch it/
>>
File: Song of the Sea 06.jpg (1MB, 877x1240px) Image search: [Google]
Song of the Sea 06.jpg
1MB, 877x1240px
>>78143623
I just upload on my regular schedule; my fight scenes just aren't very long and I try to make enough happen with each page.
Anyhow, two pages finished this week since I couldn't finish my page last week. I think the sunset colors turned out pretty well.
>>
>>78151581
All of the main six will be in it, don't worry anon.
>>
>>78151610
But I just want to see Annabeth and Jack together
>>
File: Song of the Sea 07.jpg (1MB, 877x1240px) Image search: [Google]
Song of the Sea 07.jpg
1MB, 877x1240px
>>78151603
In any case, I probably won't have time to make a new page on new year's week' which I why I really wanted to miss any weekly pages before that
>>
File: boros1.png (473KB, 1147x509px)
boros1.png
473KB, 1147x509px
>>78137430
Currently making this fancomic of OPM, already thinking/concepting/writing my own comic idea. Prob gonna start in a month or two
>>
>>78151695
also if i made a webcomic where would i post it ? any ideas ( 1 chaper usualy 30 - 50 pages )
>>
>>78151636
Yeah, you won't get to see much of that sense Jack is jewish.
>>
>>78146081
>>78149169
>>78149208

Finally home so I can assess all this better!

A trap comic, oh boy oh boy oh boy!
>>
>>78146081
Man, with a costume design like you are going to fucking hate yourself. That looks like a pain in the ass to draw.
>>
>>78152050
also it looks terrible
>>
I haven't done much lately, mostly because I've been working the seven days of the week for the last 2 weeks, and I've been piling exhaustion.
Anyway, not webcomic, but last thread there was the activity to draw OC with Winter clothes and made a pinup, and thought it wasn't enough, so I just made the full body version of the same clothes.

I'll have something for tomorrow for sure, the activity in this thread is giving me ideas, I'll try to get something done once I finish labeling every stupid patchcord I was assigned to do.

>>78151644
This looks great, but the onomatopoeias mimetize with the background too much. Personal opinion here, but I think they should have a border line.

>>78150578
I want to make an extra, I made one last year that I really liked, might try again this year, but I need to get back on track first.

>>78142977
This is great! I still need to colour the fanart I did before. I'll get into it one of these days, promise.
>>
>>78151914
Stop jerking us around and have them fuck already, Dewd. That's the only reason anybody reads your comic, to see Annabeth and Jack fuck.
>>
File: title card.png (359KB, 1280x700px) Image search: [Google]
title card.png
359KB, 1280x700px
Here's the tile card for the christmas special!

>It's an SD episode.

>>78152133
Guess we'll have to keep on reading to see if that'll happen :^)
>>
>>78152370
No, do it now. You are beholden to your readers.
>>
>>78152387
Woah friend, I think you may need to slow down.

Don't wanna eat that steak too fast :^)
>>
File: tw-1.jpg (184KB, 486x1464px) Image search: [Google]
tw-1.jpg
184KB, 486x1464px
>>78146081

So, while the guy is at work, I thought I'd play around with this story and see what you guys think.

First off, maybe having big breasts shouldn't be part of the costume. His allure should come from his butt and hips, something he inherits from his mother's side of the family.

Tone back the Trunks-like spiky hair a bit.

Give him subtle feminine features.

He always has an unsure look on his face and his posture can either be feminine or lacking confidence.

I think it'd be more interesting if everyone knew he was a boy but all the guys still flirt with him and nobody thinks it's gay. Then again that Boku Girl manga started off the same way. The Sorority route is good, too.
>>
>>78151644
Is your comic really named "song of the sea?". Because there's already a fairly well known and prestigious animated movie by that name, your comic is likely to forever stay buried in any search results if you stick with that.
>>
>>78153252
Not the artist but the comic is called The Green Knight.
>>
>>78152591
2gay4me
2wishfulfillment2binteresting
>>
>>78153403
I see. The filenames fooled me.
>>
File: tw-1v2.jpg (639KB, 1348x1506px) Image search: [Google]
tw-1v2.jpg
639KB, 1348x1506px
>>78152591

I dunno, I'm not that good at designing costumes. All I keep thinking is Bayonetta, Omega Red, and Dr. Octopus rolled up into one. Basically tone down everything and have it so that the tendrils aren't all over the place. Maybe have them be like straps so they can better and more cleanly wrap around stuff.

Do away with the skirt and have a thick belt with the insignia on the crotch to keep the crotch covered.

Okay, maybe they need "breasts."

No shoes but those things superheroes wear with their skintight costumes. Overall the costume should be skintight.

>>78153438

You're probably right.
>>
>>78153252
Nah; it's called The Green Knight; Song of the Sea was a placeholder name because at the time I couldn't think of anything

>>78152128
Yeah, I noticed that too; maybe I'll try wat you suggest, drawing borders over the crackles and snaps shouldn't tkae too long.
>>
>>78151644
There's an issue with the shading here. It's very campfire at night lighting and not sunset lighting (I'm assuming the shadows are like that because it's sunset?)
>>
>>78148910
you know you can still make it big with a series of oneshots
>>
File: 012.jpg (2MB, 1503x2250px)
012.jpg
2MB, 1503x2250px
>>78137430
New page of our manga:
http://circlejerk.de/pravitate

I'm switching to a new reader soon, because the old one resizes the pages and it looks like shit.

Free manga reader software is kinda hard to get nowadays...
>>
>>78154389
Oh, and it's read from left to right.
>>
>>78154405
Then it's not a manga.
>>
>>78154494
It looks more like a manga then a regular comic, though. I also call manwha manga, even though they're read from left to right, because everyone knows what I mean.
As soon as there's a word for German manga, I'll use it.
>>
>>78154226

I don't really have it in me for one-shots but I have had thoughts of doing something similar to comics.

There's a really hot image that Aeolus did for next week's fanart and I ended up writing a story to go along with it.

I was thinking of turning one month into a 4-5 chapter fapfic with each week having a chapter and an image to go with it.
>>
>>78149169
>I would only really consider continuing this if it got enough attention.
i know that feeling. i don't think it's a good idea to make a WEBCOMIC that you "only do if it gets attention"
individual pieces, when you feel like it and need that boost, sure.. but an ongoing comic? that's not really fair to the few who will inevitably end up getting attached. YOU Should be attached, and if you're not, no prob. do something else.
>>
>>78150499
an in-universe excuse, dude. which is really important. if a piece of fiction is nothing but 'hey real person in the audience, look at this!' that's boring as fuck
>>
>>78153606
i think it made perfect sense already: the thick 'dress' part of the suit adds to his hips in a more believable way that nobody's going to notice it's just costume
>>
>>78153916
so it's not the chapter name?
>>
>>78154540
wahllose Zeichnung
call it wahlzeich
all the bucks
>>
>>78154389
hey can you share your steam/skype , i tried to contact you via Website form it didnt work.
>>
>>78154590
Yeah, I know that feeling too. "Why am I wasting hundreds of hours of my life on this project if there's only a couple of dozen people who bothered to follow it, and even they are barely interested in it."
>>
>>78154553
shit oneshots are a lot easier for me.
>>
>>78154878
That's the catch, isn't it? You won't get much attention early on unless you're something special that 99.999% of other webcomics aren't, so multiple years of work are basically always required for something like this if you really want it to take off.
>>
>>78154878
yeah.. so like, fanart? I only do fanart if it gets attention and interest
but my own shit, -i- like it, so i keep doing it no matter what
>>
>>78154942
The problem with getting followers by drawing fanart is that they're only really following you because you drew them fanart, not because they're really interested in you comic.
>>
>>78155072
Fanart only works if your original content is derivative.

I tried making SU fanart and I got views and likes, but my content was completely ignored. When I dropped the fanart I was back to square one.
>>
File: style.png (196KB, 699x707px) Image search: [Google]
style.png
196KB, 699x707px
>>78148159
Thanks. I've been using that style mostly because it lets me churn out pages relatively quickly. It doesn't take a lot of effort. I want to be able to draw better, but I've found that I get caught up with being absolutely perfect and then all the stuff I'm working on comes to a halt because I start hating what I'm looking at. I'd love some critiques or advice.
>>
>>78155072
exactly. so if you just feel like getting satisfaction, do cheap crowdpleasing stuff. don't do a longterm comic unless YOU are really into it and would keep doing it even if nobody watched
>>
>>78155210
they just look like two different people is all. i would reduce the massive cheekbulge a bit but keep using it on anyone who should be a little chubbycute, and not-use it on anyone who doesnt
>>
>>78155355
I've already dropped 1000+ follower r34 blogs, so yeah, this is the decision I've made.
>>
File: p130.png (399KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]
p130.png
399KB, 1000x1000px
>>78139448
update

extra blog:
dumcasta.tumblr.com

miscellany art and some discussion in maybe a couple hours.
>>
>>78156467
Is she supposed to be happy or sad?
>>
>>78154104
Yeah; I had issues with the lighting because I wasn't sure if the placing of the shadows would be determined mainly b the fire or by the sun.
Do you think it would be better if I made the shadows a darker blue and made the sky more blue-to-orange like the sunset sky sometimes is?

>>78154817
I'm not sure what the chapter's name will be YET. I still have to see about that
>>
>>78156660
I think part of the problem is that sometimes literal translations of things don't work in cartoons. I know that sunsets tend to make more orange light and shadows. Yours don't feel warm like that. I'd say just Google sunset shadows or the like to get an idea of how it'll work. Making the shadows lighter and softer might help though.
>>
>>78156499
>YES! That fucking white boy is dead!

Thank anon, You make me happy!
>>
>>78156467
wtf is that expression?
>>
>>78158034
>>78156499
looks like that's just the upward curve of her beak thing, she's clearly in distress.
>>
File: ustv-the-ricky-gervais-show.jpg (21KB, 618x347px) Image search: [Google]
ustv-the-ricky-gervais-show.jpg
21KB, 618x347px
What's driving you to draw your comic, anon?
>>
>>78158433
The hope that someday it gets me money.
>>
>>78158433
Because the experiences in my life give me a unique perspective that I need to share with the rest of the world.
>>
>>78156467
>releasing story heavy webcomic in 4 panel updates which consist of tiny squares
Is this just a webcomic for yourself and you don't give a fuck?
>>
>>78158433

It is hobby, I like making stories even through I always mess up or my art is bad.
>>
>>78158433
Deep down inside of me beneath all the scars and abuse and self-loathing and crying fits there's an unwavering band of light telling me that what I'm doing is good, and if I keep doing it one day I'll be good too.
>>
>>78158633
Are you suggesting a four panel format is inappropriate for a heavy story driven webcomic? Because that would be a pretty stupid thing to claim, given there are obvious couter examples to prove you wrong.

Also, anon, the page you're replying to has two panels.
>>
File: page 12.png (748KB, 1125x1650px) Image search: [Google]
page 12.png
748KB, 1125x1650px
Here's a WIP!

Changed up Jack's eyes so he can look younger, because he is only 16. Took some cues form olden anime.
>>
>>78155210
You drawings look pretty and refined. However, you're using very simplistic version of construction. Your characters are basically 2D people living in 2D world.

I recommend watching this video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KfmA6cEpU0

If you improve your construction technique, you'll be able to draw characters that give the illusion of 3D better. You'll also draw better characters with almost the same speed you're using now.
>>
>>78158552
Lame
>>78158604
I like it
>>78158645
I like this too
>>78158653
Listen to that light, anon
>>
>>78158779
>Using youtube.
>>
>>78158433
how would you feel if someone created your universe then stopped writing your adventures? i can't stop til everyone has a happy ending
>>
>>78158834
Plenty of good artists on youtube.
>>
>>78158766
Did I miss a page? When does Jack run into Angel?
>>
>>78158757
No, he's suggesting that nunc's comic is unreadable because 4 panels make it terribly paced, and the fact they are each the same size makes each scene exposure monotonously similar.

>>78158766
>your a mormon!
>>
>>78158928
He ran to her house. I should probably have a captioon that says "Angel's house" or something.
>>78158959
Thank your Grammar anon.
>>
>>78158959
>"he's" not saying a four panel comic is inappropriate for a story heavy comic, "he's" just saying a four panel comic is inappropriate for a story heavy comic.

Well... which is it?
>>
>>78158433
Being able to tell the story that I would want to read.
>>
>>78158914

Did you actually sub to him?
>>
>>78158993
Yeah, do something to show that Jack is now at Angel's house. I would do the classic "Later, at Angel's house..." thing but you do what fits best in your comic's style.

>implying Dewd's comic has a style
>>
>>78158766
he is more chipper now!
Angel has learned to make sure her panels aren't too exploitable. also she is hilarious
>>
>>78158993
btw you also have 'your' in the first panel
>>
>>78158757
Other comics are better drawn, have better stories, better panel layout, and better dialogue.

I'm not trying to shit on him, because from how often he updates it's clear he likes his work. If it's for himself, then it's not my business. If he wants to cultivate a readership, then why wouldn't he try to improve the panel layout and pacing? There are obviously glaring flaws there.
>>
>>78158959
when it comes to following one panel to another, I do a lottt better if the panels are all similar and neatly lined up
>>
>>78159091
Are you familiar with a webcomic called Endtown, anon? It's pretty good, you should try it.
>>
>>78159091
>why don't people think the way i do? isn't it obvious they should do the things i'm suggesting if they want success?
i know you're trying to help but you need to understand how messed up that kind of thinking is. that's a hair away from "why do you dress X way if you don't want people to react Y way?"
>>
>>78159026
Yes
>>
>>78159091

This started become like a "Dewd witch-hunt" but with nunc comics?
>>
>>78159250
it's not a witch hunt, people just have really narrow-minded understanding of things where they think that their idea of quality is not only fact rather than opinion, but OBVIOUS fact. So instead of phrasing things as helpful suggestions, they act like they're stooping down to help someone who has missed something right in front of them. even if it's good advice, nobody responds well to that
>>
>>78159091
If you've got issue with the story telling or dialogue, why not bring those up?

Why bitch about something completely irrelevant like panel format?

Furthermore, if you have an issue with panel format, why didn't you tell him that when he posted a four panel page and instead waited until he posted a splash page with a mini insert?

I'm replying to Bones, aren't I?
>>
>>78159330
you're not helping either. keep your jimmies unrustled
>>
>>78159330

We are not using Bones as a Boogey-man.

He is just a angry critic.
>>
>>78159140
I'm not here to convince you, so let's leave it at that. Your viewer #'s speaks for itself. Keep doing the same you if you have no qualms with what you already got.
>>
File: atland010.jpg (306KB, 825x570px) Image search: [Google]
atland010.jpg
306KB, 825x570px
>>78159007
Are you fucking dense? There is nothing story heavy about a ship flying around in space shooting at other ships. By depicting a space fight in 4 panel format with little change between scenes and nothing to anchor the characters as being somewhere, even the void of space, all you've done is made the world's most boring dogfight.
Of course, it's more polite to phrase it like that than to simply call it dogshit which isn't helpful at all to nunc

>>78159095
That works when you're doing a Penny Arcade kind of comic, but doing a story where a lot of action or travel happens you need to be able to differenciate panels from one another. Keeping them all the same size will prevent them from having their own sense of time.
Take for example this really old strip from Atland, where even just changing the widths of 4 panels affects your sense of time while watching the scene play out.
>>
>>78159330
>Why bitch about something completely irrelevant like panel format?

Do you even comics?
>>
>>78159330
>panel format
>completely irrelevant
Are you on this board only for the cartoons and memes?
>>
File: forchan.jpg (306KB, 639x1000px) Image search: [Google]
forchan.jpg
306KB, 639x1000px
Nice to see good ole HYWC is still showing their love with hate.

So comfy.
>>
>>78159449
We also show our hate with love!
>>
>>78159408
so if it's not story heavy then what's your gripe?
I disagree with the rest of what you're saying. also that example you gave is A) hard to read and B) not a good example of what you're saying at all
>>
File: TNCL.png (666KB, 777x1100px)
TNCL.png
666KB, 777x1100px
From a comic tournament I'm in right now...
>>
>>78159398
it's incorrect to be results-oriented in an area of life with a heavy amount of random chance and personal taste involved
>>78159411
>>78159438
it's one of the most irrelevant parts. you might as well bitch about framerate in games
>>
>>78159411
I do even comics. Which is why I know there's nothing wrong with a four panel format.
>>
File: TNCL2.png (1MB, 1553x1100px)
TNCL2.png
1MB, 1553x1100px
>>78159541
>>
>>78159449
eh you missed out. we had some snuggleness going on while you were gone
>>
File: TNCL3.png (466KB, 777x1100px)
TNCL3.png
466KB, 777x1100px
>>78159557
>>
>>78159542
No wonder your comic is shit
>>
File: endtown.gif (97KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]
endtown.gif
97KB, 500x500px
ITT: poseurs
>>
>>78159591
>No wonder your comic is shit.

What is your comic?
>>
>>78159518
So you ARE dense then.
>>
>>78159543
It depends man. Theoretically there's nothing wrong, but there's a lot you can do with paneling to change everything the reader gets from the scene. Four panels doesn't just mean 4 identical squares.

>>78159568
Aww.
>>
Does anyone have experience with printing some comic books?

I want to print some short story comic books and sell them at a local convention. I'm wondering if theres any profit in it, and how much it'd cost to get like 100, 25 page comics printed.
>>
>>78159877
It's all reliant on economy of scale first and foremost, and beyond that, how fancy you want the printed books to be. Getting 1000 books printed is cheaper per book than getting 100 printed. Basically it requires contacting a number of printers, figuring out your options, and then just comparing prices, and figuring out a profit margin.
>>
>>78159793
>someone i can quote agrees with me, therefore i am right!
i bet you add a lot of 'citation needed' tags
>>
>>78159925
Cry more, shit artist
>>
>>78159925
It's like dobson 2.0.
>>
>>78158959
> 4 panels
As someone who started out with the idea of a simple 4 panel format, I found it really restrictive.

If you do it like Endtown/Ava's Demon and have a really tight schedule you can make it work, but otherwise I'd take the suggestions here and make it a regular page or something analogue.
>>
>>78160051
What's like Dobson 2.0?

What the fuck are you even trying to say except for quoting memes?
>>
File: Get out of this thread.gif (471KB, 474x379px) Image search: [Google]
Get out of this thread.gif
471KB, 474x379px
>>78160051

>dobson 2.0.

I am not that guy, But you need better comparison. You don't need to mention him in every fucking thread.
>>
>>78160091
Nothing, just memes man. You're right, 4 square panels is the key. Keep it up.
>>
>>78160155
Maybe you could come up with an actual argument as to why four panels is bad?

I don't think you could explain why Dobson is bad either, but it'd be fun to watch you try.
>>
>>78160191
they don't have to defend it, it's a valid suggestion
but it wasn't phrased as a suggestion or opinion
>>
>>78160191
My two cents: every page should make something happen, advance character or introduce a new element.

Half-pages are a handicap because of this. As I said if you have a tight schedule you can mitigate this fact, but if you don't you're forcing the reader to go through twice the content to get a page's worth of advancement.
>>
>>78160237
>they don't have to defend it it's valid

If it's valid then it should be easy to defend. I'd like to know why Endtown sucks because it has 4 panels.
>>
>>78160278
If something important happens in one or two panels, why would you add extra unnecessary panels just to make it four?
>>
>>78160365
i think only CYOA type comics can get away with a one or two panel update
>>
>>78160392
I agree with this post, UNLESS it's a splash page type deal. But you can't be doing those all the time.
>>
>>78160365
There's nothing wrong with full page spreads or establishing shots, but since you are releasing single pages, what you accomplish on every update becomes important. If you make it less panels, you either have to compress the pacing or wait till the next page.

I don't think it's super big of a deal and there's really no scientific evidence in favor of 'standard' page, so take it with a grain of salt like all the other advice you see in here (and don't ignore it either).
>>
>>78159541
Lookin
>>78159557
Pretty
>>78159579
Goooooooooood!
>>
>>78159877
I get my own comics printed, and sell them at conventions. There's probably not a lot of profit in it, as the costs of table, transport, etc all take their cut.

As >>78159904 says, getting 1000 printed will be cheaper per unit than getting 100 printed, but are you certain you can sell 1000 copies? 100 is a good baseline for an initial run to test the waters. You could probably even do 50 or less if there's little difference per unit than printing 100.

Shop around for printers, to compare costs, and also see if they actually know what a comic book is supposed to look like (I've heard stories of people getting a comic back from the printers and it was all single sided pages spiral bound).

Cost wise, your cover price should be around three times what it cost to print (my comics cost me about £1 to print each, I sell them for £3). However, bear in mind what similarly sized comics cost (currently £3 is about average for a 24pp, A5 small press/indy comic in the UK); you don't want to be trying to sell your comic for $9 when everyone else is selling theirs for $5.

Your comic will need to have 24 or 28 pages, or any multiple of 4. You might want to run off a copy or two at home, just to have some idea of how it's put together, and to have something to show the printers.

If you're based in the UK, I can recommend some printers who specialise in making comics.
>>
File: 7.jpg (110KB, 1600x818px)
7.jpg
110KB, 1600x818px
>>78137430

cant work on my webcomic right now, in to much pain, wish i could, all i can do is these quick chicken scratch sketches

here, have a batgirl sketch i did last night

i will get to a dentists and get these teeth pulled and get back to work on my comic as soon as i can, until then mind numming pain that turns my brain off and burns the entire left side of my face and ear and fucks with my heart, also feels like a butcher knife and crowbar lodged into my top and bottom jaw, i think im dying bros, think im about to pull my own tooth with a pair of pliers... fuck this gay earth

its hard for me to be on the computer to long, peace yall

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rF2tULbsE3g
>>
File: chimp2 copy.jpg (2MB, 2346x2364px) Image search: [Google]
chimp2 copy.jpg
2MB, 2346x2364px
Never been on this board before but made a comic for uni and would like outsider opinions on it.

http://beanyellow.tumblr.com/post/134869287354/comic-done-for-uni-about-chimps
>>
>>78160985
>http://beanyellow.tumblr.com/post/134869287354/comic-done-for-uni-about-chimps
nice art
>>
>>78160596
man i just printed out CD covers and handed out data CDs with all my comic files
>>
>>78160985
hoho! reversal!
>>
>>78161140
That's just not the same as having a real book.
>>
>>78161110
Thanks, I really enjoyed drawing it.

>>78161246
Reversal?
>>
>>78161297
well that's not fair, i guess people dont go hunting chimps
but we would if there were more than like 6 of them
>>
>>78161140
You can't read a CD on the train or bus going home from the convention, not unless you brought a laptop with you.

That said, if you have an unusual/unprintable format (e.g. infinite canvas, animated panels, branching storylines etc) then a data CD makes some sense.
>>
So, the only way to have activity in here is when shit starts flying?
>>
>>78161331
Ah I see, I thought "reversal" was a /co/ colloquialism
>>
>>78161291
tru dat. but I had over 1000 comics,.. and i was giving it out for free to all my friends for christmas.
>>
>>78161333
>Reading while moving
carsick city
>>
File: comicmarx.jpg (973KB, 2508x3541px) Image search: [Google]
comicmarx.jpg
973KB, 2508x3541px
>>
Any tips for hand lettering and not getting ink blots at the end of them?
>>
File: observe.png (98KB, 700x400px)
observe.png
98KB, 700x400px
http://bug-quest.tumblr.com/post/135103310180
getting those feelings on
hooh boy

im getting slow at this
>>
>>78162517

SHE IS BACK!
>>
>>78162495
i dont suppose 'tablet' would be a satisfactory answer..
>>78161863
yeah that's pretty much how it works
>>78162517
man how many times have i not realized how much i had a heart-on for a girl until she or i moved away...
>>
File: crabpeople.png (130KB, 1000x1400px) Image search: [Google]
crabpeople.png
130KB, 1000x1400px
Working on character designs presently. I'm quite new to this, so it's somewhat slow going, but I'm having plenty of fun anyway. Might share some more, should anyone be interested to see.
>>
>>78163034
oh yeah, the famous wizard cubeclops. he's just the best guy around. but can anyone find the key to his heart?
>>
File: page 12.png (1MB, 1125x1650px)
page 12.png
1MB, 1125x1650px
Finished this page!
>>
>>78163118
>your
>your (again)
>uncolored background people
>>
>>78163247
Oh yeah, the grammar mistakes, I'll fix that right now.

The uncolored background people was a stylistic choice though
>>
File: shit.jpg (1MB, 3501x2550px)
shit.jpg
1MB, 3501x2550px
Has anyone here actually made it to a professional level? I'm asking because I feel like a webcomic with a strong readership would look pretty good on a Darkhorse of Vertigo resume
>>
>>78163696
That's my goal. I expect it to take several years at a minimum, if it ever even happens.
>>
>>78163696
>professional level

no, Nobody in this thread did.

If we did, We will not be in this thread.
>>
>>78163282
stylistic choice my ass - it looks like you aren't even trying. if you're trying to create a shift between fore/middle ground then it would be helpful to lighten the value of the lines as you recede into the background. the white doesn't work here because its a lighter value than the background and the outlines are pushed to the foreground because they're solid black. at least lay down some light value instead of none so it doesn't read as empty space. there needs to be some readable hierarchy in terms of back/middle/fore ground.
>>
will making webcomics get me some phat nerd pussy?
>>
>>78163696
I'm getting extremely close
>>78163904
I will keep that in mind anon.
>>
>>78163921
Only if you pander in the right way.
>>
>>78159877
I do a ton of cons every year.

Original content does not sell. At all.
>>
File: Recycle picture.jpg (88KB, 702x604px)
Recycle picture.jpg
88KB, 702x604px
I was bored.

So, I draw LP (Lovely posion) with her parents.
>>
>>78163921
You know, that made me think of a pretty good question, has anyone tried working on a comic or project with a significant other? or met someone through a project?
>>
>>78163999
My girlfriend and I started dating because we both made comics, and we started having jam sessions to get our pages done together.
>>
File: giphy.gif (1007KB, 500x591px) Image search: [Google]
giphy.gif
1007KB, 500x591px
>>78164037
>>78163999

>Tfw no girlfriend
>No friends
>Nobody is interest in comics except this thread

Goddamn it.
>>
>>78163964
If you get a big enough fanbase it does, but that's top 2% of webcomics, maybe just top 1%.
>>
>>78163927
do you seriously think you're almost at a professional level? you make me wonder if you're trolling half the time.
>>
>>78163964
Anime cons or comic festivals? Original shit sells like garbage at anime cons, but you get more people picking up your original stuff at festivals at least in my experience.
>>
>>78163696
I've done interiors and page tests for Boom, so depending on what you want to consider "professional", yeah.
>>
>>78164156
Well yeah this is definitely true. Festivals and coffee/tea shops are much better for original comics and zines.
>>
File: wavetothecrowds.png (5KB, 650x450px) Image search: [Google]
wavetothecrowds.png
5KB, 650x450px
>>78163099
Only the fairest for my sweet prince.

That one's more a crab-ish cubeclops priest, though. He doesn't take much offense, though. Likely not bright enough to feel offended either way.

And this thing is something different entirely, since I don't have many drawings of the crab-cube-clops at present.
>>
>>78164182
Abaddon?
>>
>>78163696
it looks good on a cartoon network resume
>>
>>78163974
this is adorable somehow
did you mean poison? because i think posion is a cute name too
>>
>>78163999
i know i always assume partners are couples. in the case of johnny wander I was right! and that was the one I was least sure of
>>78164080
hey guy in the same boat, i didnt notice you there in the same boat as me. mustve been sitting in the back of the same boat as i'm in. let's be friends.
>>
>>78164385
subtly good fingershapes. just the right curves.
>>
>>78164422
Nah.
>>
>>78160581
Thanks!
>>
>>78163999
My co-writer wrong fanfiction for my comic. Then he started writing on it. Now we live together.
>>
>>78163696
>a webcomic with a strong readership

that doesn't equate to skill
Look at the assholes who do QC, SYAC, MSPA, etc
>>
>>78166744
>the past tense of write is wrong
there's certain poetry to that
>>
File: image.jpg (81KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
81KB, 800x600px
>>78149169
>FUCKING LALA
>>
File: Leslie and Selena Winter 03.png (543KB, 600x833px) Image search: [Google]
Leslie and Selena Winter 03.png
543KB, 600x833px
Having drawings done and no new strips is turning into a running gag on itself, but I'm glad I still manage to sit and do something.

Should I post the one too? >>78152128

I decided to make a strip for Xmas that I hope to have done soon to show you all later today, or tomorrow. Before the thread closes for sure.
>>
>tfw your comic is shit and you have no readers nor ideas anymore
how do I save myself?
>>
Fuh, what do you do when all your ideas are dumb and boring? my imagination's broken
>>
>>78168009 Save from what? What are you aiming to achieve doing webcomics? going pro? making shekels? being poplar?
>>
>>78168340
any or all of the above
>>
The thing of getting popular is finding a target audience and aiming solely to them, the wider your target audience go, the harder is to keep them invested in your work.

I think furries are still insta popular, and their fanbase is still dedicated. Of course that would be easier if you can enjoy doing it, but I know of people that doesn't enjoy doing it, yet, they know they can bank good cash and are fairly popular on those circles.

If you want to get somewhere doing your own stuff, well, show something to see what's on store for you.

No one asked, but here's the other one, since I'm already making a post.
>>
Uh, is there a character design thread? I made a reference for a character in my comic, but i'm not sure of where to post it.
>>
>>78168751
Most people dump it in here, but I think /co/ has a "work on your art" thread that wouldn't be unfitting for what you want.

Though if you wanna promote your webcomic, it's better to do it here..
>>
>>78154876
Damn, I wonder why it doesn't work. Guess I'll have to look into that.
Steam ID is:
https://steamcommunity.com/id/Galebourn
>>
>>78168751
If it's webcomic related, post here! We all love to see some concepts~
>>
File: belziarius.png (3MB, 1994x1632px) Image search: [Google]
belziarius.png
3MB, 1994x1632px
>>78168962
Not looking to promote my comic since i have no intention of putting it online, but C&C on the character design would be great. He's a shapeshifter, so his hand is not always like that.
>>
>>78169021
wow, THE catholic monster?
basically my criticism can be summed up in one word: stubby. stubby fingers, stubby toes, stubby wings, and slightly odd abs and heel anatomy.. but hey he's a shapeshifter, he can do what he wants right?
seems odd not to put a comic online but whatever
>>
>>78169021

He look like Doctor fate with ears. If I was designing him, I will give him like a priest or pope outfit. The red body is just ugly as hell.

I like the wings.
>>
File: End of Soul 2.png (1MB, 1489x2048px) Image search: [Google]
End of Soul 2.png
1MB, 1489x2048px
>>78169132
Thanks mate. I've been doing the comic since I was 12, it's a mess of a comic, althought recent issues are kind of good. I'd have to re-do it from the beggining and it's just too much work.
>>78169170
His head is supossed to be made of bone, and his body of blood. He's a soldier commanded by God. He's the "monster", wich is an official title. Giving him clothes would make him way too human.
>>
>>78169021
People tend to underplay wings. Increase the size, it makes them not only more practical in a realistic sense but also usually looks badass.
>>
>>78169021
First thought was that he looks way too much like an Evangelion character.
>>
>>78169480
He's pretty much a rip-off to be sincere.
>>
>>78164530
I'll be your pal
>>
>>78169521
pal made. misshon comprete
>>
>>78169580
>implying you're pals
>implying you aren't just retards
>>
>>78169580

Dude, What is with your spellings?

We got spell checks.
>>
>>78168336
oh. i forgot. monsters.
i need to remember that the next time this happens. When all your ideas are boring, put in monsters. inspiration will flow.
>>
File: JasperGold22.jpg (953KB, 900x1279px) Image search: [Google]
JasperGold22.jpg
953KB, 900x1279px
Just updated for tomorrow morning. What do you guys think?
>>
>>78170385
shit, talking vultures still eat people? that's gnarly, man. that's rough. i love their hats though. so appropriate. and makes em look like thanksgiving turkeys
>>
>>78170385
Looks good, great art.
>>
>>78170385
From a blank page to what you have now, how long do you think this took you?
>>
File: image.jpg (975KB, 2448x1955px) Image search: [Google]
image.jpg
975KB, 2448x1955px
>>78159877
I've only sold mine at Zine Fests. I personally liked it. And because it's all "DIY" the cost wasn't all that great for 80 copies of my book. It only came at around $50 for ink. It helps greatly if you have an office job, or any job with access to a printer.
>>
I'm looking for some writing critique. I have a 15-page comic at: www.wondercomics.org/hot007
I really just want to know what I could improve on.
>>78170385
Unrelated, but I love the way this looks.
>>
File: zax.png (650KB, 893x598px)
zax.png
650KB, 893x598px
Uploading something where people can see it helps me ascertain its truer flaws.
>>
>>78170454
Heh, thanks. I did model them after "Turkey Vultures."
>>78170566
Thanks.
>>78170608
Penciling a page usually takes around 2 hours. My pencils are pretty rough. Inking takes about 3 or 4 hours. Because of my job, I work on and off on a page every week.
>>78170626
Thank you
>>
>>78159541
>>78159557
>>78159579
Do you have a tumblr?
>>
>>78170678
I really dig the designs on the bridge and trees. Looks awesome.
>>
Just finished a "story arc" in Ennui GO! Going back to gag comics for a while tomorrow.
>>
File: pucker up buckaroo.gif (996KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]
pucker up buckaroo.gif
996KB, 500x380px
>>78170851
Ah, danke. It's always a relief when the little details aren't lost from mention like this.

I mean sometimes I worry people will just blitz past what I put into my comic. Putting the thought into my head I should do some blitzing myself. Especially when I'm on hour 5 and onwards of the same page, daydreaming about a webcomic that uploads huge installments with a quick turn around. Like I should I should give the depth a rest; Which I believe can make the product suffer. It's an echo chamber of that and "No, remember your roots tho"

But now(!!!): I wanna sharpen those contours you mentioned, just to make sure your compliment stays true to a wider, more skeptical audience. To capitalize on that affirmation that yes, people are actually stopping to notice these things.

-Sorry if this whole post seemed like an apropos of nothing. I've been trying to hone a paragraph for these thoughts in general. My feedback honeymoon has been over for awhile here and I'm not a fresh sight anymore. I never assume a lack of comment is because something is working fine. I assume total indifference. Plus, the 'tough love; no hugbox' feedback is a lot more popular than I find useful. I'm my own cat o nine tails but no one seems to believe me!

Your art is superb, and one of my more irrational fears is that my weebish style would rub people like you wrong on sight. Glad that isn't the case. Some moleman kisses are in order.
>>
>>78171195
You are SO bloated.
>>
>>78171195
>I mean sometimes I worry people will just blitz past what I put into my comic.
I sometimes worry about that as well, but that same thought is what lets me just put ink on paper and not worry too much about it. I do enjoy your contours and choice of color. It gives it a nice aesthetic feel.
>one of my more irrational fears is that my weebish style would rub people like you wrong on sight.
I've got nothing against weeb stuff/designs. my inner weeb enjoys it from time to time
>>
>>78171405
What does "bloated" mean? I googled it, but it didn't made any sense. (No puedo Inglés)
>>
>>78171480
What Scribble is. Inflated.
>>
>>78171480

I guess he is talking about his self-esteem issues.
>>
>>78171497

Goddamn it! It doesn't make sense and You are sounding like a fucking idiot.
>>
>>78171510
Gracias!
>>
>>78158385
This. I can still fix it if it's really that bad.

>>78160575
Walsh detonates a bomb. The bomb consumes both his ship and his opponents. Birch believes Walsh's ship destroyed.

That's the whole idea. Thus it's a whole page. Were it written it would be its own paragraph, a short one but a complete one. I don't see the problem.
>>
File: 54.png (565KB, 1200x1700px) Image search: [Google]
54.png
565KB, 1200x1700px
This fights gonna last forever.
>>
Cool more drama shit.
>>
>>78171798
I just checked, you can sockpuppet with pc + smart phone.
>>
SHUT THE FUCK UP ALL OF YOU

DROP IT

TALK ABOUT COMICS

DONT RESPOND
>>
>>78172186

ok
:^)
>>
What program do most people tend to use? I know the standards are Sai, Photoshop, GIMP and the likes, but I'm wondering how many people tend to use what.
>>
>>78172186
But remember the bit about the rage keys.

Well. About keys in general.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2BU4d-G7c8
>>
>>78172244
I use MS5 now, it's so nice
>>
>>78172186

Okay, So, I making a villain that is ghost and can control electricity.

I am thinking tomorrow on writing and drawing his character.
>>
>>78172244

I use photoshop mostly. I also use flash but I'm pretty close to dropping that. Mostly for issues about publishing colors.
>>
>>78172260
> I making a villain that is ghost and can control electricity

???
>>
>>78170678
the 3dness of that cinnamon bun tree is amazing
>>
>>78171480
to be swollen up, typically with fluid
in this case, it's being used as a metaphor for being puffed up with ego. to "have a swelled head" they say
>>
>>78172293
>???

I am confuse about this post. Did I forgot to say "I'm".
>>
>>78172293

Pretty sure it's the ms paint anon and he's talking about his Phantom villain.
>>
>>78172259
it really is. it's odd how it comes up whenever people ask this, yet the people asking never list it among the ones they're considering
>>
>>78163964
This is fucking depressing.
>>
>>78172414
How about something constructive, you twat?
(Not him but I hate this attitude in these threads)
>>
>>78172260
a boltergeist eh? i'm down
>>
>>78172445
Well, that's why there's an "etc." I didn't ask about Clip Studio Paint, but I own a copy of that as well as Sai, Photoshop, and MS4. I'm just wondering what people making comics prefer, for curiosity's sake.
>>
>>78172452
just remember that the inflammatory response to it is usually half of the derailleur
>>78172448
i gotta admit, as much as i love SOME people's original work, i never go looking for it because there's no solid way to find it, and little guarantee any of it will be good
whereas fanart is like.. much higher chance of good quality (depending on the franchise in question), or if it's bad you can see it coming a mile away and restrict your search.. likelihood of there being a lot of it.. easy to digest.. it's not really surprising it gets more attention.
What we need is some kind of way of finding original franchises. A catalog or something. Some kind of big collective searchable index so you can be like "hey who's writing spooky shit" or crossreference shit like "Fantasy and also lesbian aliens" or "philosophy and toupees" and importantly be able to filter out shit that barely published a few pieces before disappearing a decade ago
>>
>>78172448
Pretty much, yeah! People at anime/comic conventions aren't looking to find new things to like.

They want fanart of things they ALREADY like.
>>
>>78172514
somebody's rich.
i use photoshop because it took me years to learn it and I still only use maybe a tenth of what it can do. the prospect of switching to the admittedly superior clipstudio, which i own, is so daunting i can't do it. it's not exactly terrifying, but it's like going out to hunt for a possibly extinct animal for your lunch when you have a warm plate of food in front of you. neurologically you just wouldn't
>>
>>78172520
>>78172529
What I find depressing is that there's not as much institution or ceremony for original content.

I mean. People want to know they're going to start reading something that isn't terrible. We need more critics and such that lubricate this process. And not a bunch of "too cool for the room/this isn't progressive enough" bastards.
>>
>>78172458

Low-cap anon, You are too much of a friend.

I really do not want a hug-box until I become a better artist and grow out of my ms-paint phase.
>>
>>78159877
It sucks but original content doesn't really do well at cons unless it's specifically asked for. Unless your brand is known and popular, people won't touch it. I'm friends with some of the artists for Katawa Shoujo, and even their prints only started really selling well in the past two or three years.
>>
>>78172529
It's sad.. the only thing I can think of where people want something new, and where fanstuff is almost nonexistent, is indy games. Nobody's interested in your original zelda game no matter how brilliant you think it is (dude mine is so brill though), nobody is even making them for that reason. too much work for something that'll just be taken down anyway
And yet really, fans are going to have the COOLEST original stuff because it'll have the right influences. look at atomic robo
>>
>>78172537
I bought most of them back when I was working. I'm homeless now, so I'm just holding on to what I have.
>>
>>78172561
>buying programs
No wonder you have no money.
>>
>>78172544
I think we just need a kind of tangible reward. trophies are meaningless, but you can say "hey look, tons of people are watching/reading/playing this". appropriately enough, having-its-own-fandom-and-fanart is what makes one as interested in seeing original works as fanworks
So the key is not directly reviewing the works themselves, but showcasing their fandoms. okay maybe not on /co/ where a big fandom just gets you hate, but anywhere else that's a good sign. The big homestuck fandom made me gave it a shot. I still didnt like it, but i respect it. The big prequel fandom would probably have gotten me into it by now if i hadn't stumbled upon it by a friend linking me the individual images back in its early days, straight from the forum.
i like to think my fanart page would make me look pretty awesome if you saw it divorced from my comic. but then again it would make the comic itself a letdown
>>
>>78172545
shit son i can never read your mood. now that i remember who you are. also your english is just all over the place, sometimes good, sometimes bad..
but I was just being honest. electric ghosts sound good. Since your post was basically nothing, my response should be taken as equally nothing. just mild approval of a concept

still anticipating seeing how you work on a tablet. i'll be glad to give you some tips while you're getting the hang of it
>>
>>78172561
ah shit dude, i was joking, like I do whenever people describe owning multiple game consoles within a given generation. That's rough man, good luck. At least you have a computer. I guess I'd rather have that than a house. Home is where the files are, right?
>>
>>78172458
>BOLTERGEIST XDDD
>>
>>78172244
I almost exclusively use SAI - I gotta learn PS soon though...
>>
File: Redesign 2.png (24KB, 578x746px) Image search: [Google]
Redesign 2.png
24KB, 578x746px
>>78172600

My English depends on my sleeping patterns.
>>
>>78172581
When you want to support a company that makes something you like, you give them money. Twelve year olds are the ones that think otherwise.
>>
File: Er_Vi.png (578KB, 707x705px) Image search: [Google]
Er_Vi.png
578KB, 707x705px
>>78172583
Nah nah, trophies are not meaningless when people are talking about the fact you got one. That's TRAFFIC. And therefore, extremely helpful.

Gives people prospects. And these medium, by god, needs things for creators to look forward to. Otherwise, they're just going to ditch it for "real jobs." We've all seen it happen.
>>
>>78172733
I'm knocking on 30, and I think it's absurd to charge over 500 dollars for something that people with an artist's pocket change need to produce art with.
>>
>>78172733

I agree but I wish Adobe didn't charge out the ass for their program. And I'll be damned if I do a subscription service.
>>
>>78172770
You agree.

But you completely disagree.

Hrm.
>>
>>78172785

I buy what I can afford.
>>
>>78172794
But you don't pay Adobe and that makes you a 12 year old.
>>
>>78172815
The subscription thing is bullshit. So glad I bought CS6 when I could.
>>
>Not using torrent discount
>>
>>78172769
You don't NEED photoshop, it's just an option. That said, Adobe knows very well that their program is pirated to hell and back. That cost is basically for companies that want to use their product, not so much the individual.

>>78172770
See above.

>>78172815
>>78172867
Quiet, you. At least pretend you know English before you start trolling.
>>
>>78172883
>That said, Adobe knows very well that their program is pirated to hell and back. That cost is basically for companies that want to use their product, not so much the individual.

They're extremely stupid.

If the price was 50 bucks for this ELECTRONIC DATA, the amount of individual people buying it would increase by twentyfold, making them more money they earn now.

You could suddenly ask for photoshop for birthdays and christmases. Think about it, because Adobe hasn't.
>>
>>78172733
When you don't have much money, it's smart to save where you can. Homeless retards are the ones that think otherwise
>>
>>78172883

That's the business license to use it. The individual one is still expensive. But that's nothing compared to the cost for high end editing and 3d software.
>>
>>78173004
> still live with their parents
With the economic crash and the hike of college tuition, this isn't the insult it used to be.

I'm sorry.
>>
>>78173019
Where? Mexico? Please, hiding behind bullshit like that to excuse your own incompetence and laziness.
>>
>>78173004

Meh. It's always pricey. No matter what.
>>
>>78173045
No, not Mexico.

I find that question strange.
>>
>>78173053
And I'm going to enjoy my unlimited free time, spending it doing all the studies I want, and focusing any amount of time I want into perfecting a craft. Keep on working for those corporations you despise so much, hypocrite.

>>78173066
I don't disagree.

>>78173069
Good talk.
>>
>>78173101
I don't think it was a good talk.
>>
webcomics
>>
Why is this thread filled with angry people now?
>>
ANYWAY

Friendly reminder that there's an activity in the OP for those that need something Christmassy for their comic.
>>
>>78173141

Silver lining, the thread is more active this time than normal.
>>
so how do you keep your art style consistent?

I once did a webcomic and the art style changed dramatically and not in a good way
>>
>>78173242
If it wasn't in a good way, that probably means you were picking up bad habits. Study construction and anatomy a little more, I promise it'll help.
>>
File: TNCLwp.jpg (941KB, 777x1100px) Image search: [Google]
TNCLwp.jpg
941KB, 777x1100px
>>78170777

Yeah. But my comic stuff isn't on there. Just illustrations:

http://bridgefirepictures.tumblr.com/
>>
>>78173242

practice drawing the same characters the same way. A lot. That will help with consistency where it matters the most.

If you find yourself shifting a lot because of other artwork you like that you see and you don't like the results, it's probably because you are still trying to find a style that works and you are happy with. I tell you, I do the same thing all the time. To this day what I learned is that for every artist that I really like, there seems to be some artist they took their own cues from. So it's not necessarily a bad thing.
>>
>>78173325
Where might your comic stuff be?
>>
I don't understand the deletion patterns of our janitor.
>>
Thinking of dropping an ebook on Amazon and anywhere else of the first 11 pages. It'll include the censored and uncensored cover and some of the sketches of pages. I was keeping it cheap, at about $1. I'm not too needy for money but I think the low cost and cover would net more people and that's what I want.

Any advice?
>>
>12 years of occasional, rather rare drawing
>finally realize I had the skull shape wrong all this time
Jesus Christ it's painful. If I wasn't so lazy and autistically stubborn about my way of doing things, it wouldn't hurt so much. Now I need to relearn this from the scratch.

The funny part is someone mentioned this to me months ago in these threads and I completely ignored it. Fucking half-assed animu drawing guides I swear to God.
>>
>>78174205
>animu
Why has this nothing meme lasted this long.
>>
>>78164135
Well, I'm going to be getting books and merchandise soon, and some consider that when you get money off of your comic, your considered that your on a professional level.
>>
>>78174428
I have never met a more deluded person in my whole life.

No one has been as impervious to new information as you.
>>
>>78174441
Look man, your getting way to mad over such a simple response. I think you need to calm down a bit.

I know my art isn't the Profesional level.
>>
>>78174428
I wish I was more like you, man. Just jammin out everything without overthinking it, not doubting the quality of your content or in general any of your decissions. Love that! You just live the life most others can dream about.
>>
>>78174428
>I'm going to be getting books and merchandise soon
Books are understandable.

But merch... Who would want them?
>>
>>78174441
How is he deluded when he isn't wrong? When you're making money from it, you're a professional. Quality aside, that's the definition.
>>
>>78174452
Remind me, what's your website nowadays?
>>
>>78174557
>>78174452
Not to say your quality is bad. I just mean quality isn't a factor.
>>
>>78174428

Ok dewd give me some stats and stuff to give us a good idea of your fanbase. Maybe a screenshot of page views and unique visitors.
>>
>>78174549
one Annabeth onahole pls
>>
>>78174428
I say it's only professional level if your sole source of income is your comic. If you still have to have a real job it doesn't count.
>>
"Iz PROFESSIONAL NOW"
- Dewd 2015
>>
>>78174853
Don't be mean to Dewd, he is a precious flower. We must nurture him.
>>
File: TNCLwp.jpg (395KB, 777x1100px) Image search: [Google]
TNCLwp.jpg
395KB, 777x1100px
>>78173575

http://bridgefirecomics.deviantart.com/

For now, anyway....
>>
>>78174784

You're wrong. If you're making money off of your work at all, then you can consider yourself a professional.

National Guard is still the military even though it's part time, right? Same thing.
>>
The great thing about this day and age is that you can make digital merchandise at no cost to you if not many people buy. If anything it'd be a good way to gauge demands. That's what I'd want to know.
>>
>>78174566
Freakanimes.com\westtree
>>78174583
I would, but I'm on mobile.
My viewer ship is usually in the 500s on update days.
>>
File: WebsiteImage.png (199KB, 922x368px)
WebsiteImage.png
199KB, 922x368px
>>78163696
I'm making my way there, so far I've just been doing furry porn for like the last two years. So I have nothing I can throw into a portfolio right now.
Here's some stuff I doodled that I'm throwing up on my homepage.
>>
>>78175246
>furry porn

I'm listening
>>
>>78163118
I like it, but change "wine party" to "dinner party", and "going up" to "looking up". Also the characters could be framed better so they aren't cut off or too close to the borders, in the second panel you forgot to draw her left arm, and the panels don't line up down the side of the page or in general so it looks quite shoddy.
>>
>>78163964
Unless it's porn or hand drawn commissions. People love porn. Especially printed porn. Also you can charge out the ass 4 it.
>>
>>78175435
Wine parties do exist, my aunt hosts them all the time.

Also, angel lost her arm last chapter.

But other than that, I will fix.
>>
>>78175497
I have wine parties
everyday
by myself
I'm an alcoholic
>>
>>78175052
>Freakanimes.com\westtree
You know, it's funny to see how Annabeth was definitely female, complete with breasts or how Sarah had a normal nose for the first few pages.
>>
>>78174568
why are you worried about criticizing somebody's art in an art thread? dewd's stuff is low quality, it's bad (though a little bit better than a while back), it's unpleasant and unappealing. i've wrote replies to him a bunch of times in addition to others explaining why, but he ignores it and continues to shit out this stuff because it requires the least amount of effort. if dewd is a flower i have poured so much fertilizer...
>>
>>78175541
Me too man. Only they're vodka parties.
Wanna come over and cry while listening to Sheena Easton.
>>
>>78175575
I actually do have an explanation for annabeth's breasts and why they changed, but that's a major part of the story that's way later.
>>78175578
Are you saying you gave me a lot of shit?
>>
Finally added in the people.
>>
File: 2015-12-14 08.59.43.jpg (978KB, 1269x983px) Image search: [Google]
2015-12-14 08.59.43.jpg
978KB, 1269x983px
>>78175638
Drooped the picture
>>
File: stud.png (79KB, 642x784px) Image search: [Google]
stud.png
79KB, 642x784px
>>78175598
yes [/spoilers]
>>
>>78175710
>[/spoilers]
what the fuck
>>
>>78175632
Good one, but I wasn't rude if that's what you mean. You have a long way to go but act like you're "there" already.
>>
>>78175578
It's pretty clear at this point that this is a safe space for self-promotion, not criticism.
>>
>>78175737
Oh yeah, I know, my art changes pretty much changes little by little every day.
>>
>>78175740
>this is a safe space for self-promotion, not criticism
so it's a hugbox circlejerk now? i know harsh critique hasn't always been welcomed here, but we're one of the only active webcomic communities there is and we're gonna decide criticism isn't appropriate content? almost everybody here, myself included, makes shit work and the last think we need are asspats to convince us it's okay. it's hard enough getting a crit face-to-face, why limit yourself when you're under the veil of anonymity?
>>
>>78175992
I agree with this guy.
>>
>>78175435
Oh sorry, it just looks like she has 2 hands in the forth panel so I got confused. I also got mixed up because I've only ever heard "wine tasting party", not "wine party".
>>
>>78176136
Reply to:
>>78175497
>>
>>78172769
>>78172770

Photoshop is $10 a month
>>
>>78175740
Considering how people here argue over if a comic is good or not, it's not a safe space. An artist defending their stance isn't always a bad thing nor does it always show a lack of desire to improve. It's the blind leading the blind here. None of us are Scott Mccloud here, we are all in the same boat really and none of us are in a position to teach. My point is not a single person here will be right all the time. Listening to others is great but at the end of the day there is no pleasing everyone regardless of what you do.
>>
>>78176136
Well, wine party is the shortened version.
>>
>>78176667
Ok man, I've just never heard the expression before. When you google "wine party" wine tasting parties show up first instead.
>>
>>78176744
Much better than a lemon party
>>
>>78175992
I'd love to get criticism here. Occasionally I'll get some, take it to heart, even if it takes me a little while to wrap my head around it, and it makes me a better artist.

The problem is, criticism is a lot like drawing. It's an art in and of itself. Some people are good at it, some are bad. Those who are good got it through years of practice and observing their peers. Some, like really cringey dA tier artists, do it for years very badly, and copy what they see without any real understanding of what they're doing.

Too many people on these threads criticize as badly as they draw.
>>
>>78177101
>Too many people on these threads criticize as badly as they draw.

Then you ignore it. Problem solved? These long ranty threads start because someone has to argue with a crit instead of just letting it go.
>>
>>78156850
Hey; I tried changing the colors a bit to make the scene closer to night time, does this look better?
>>
>>78177186
That is WAY better!
>>
>>78177177
Anon, if a bad critiquer can't accept criticism, than he'll never learn.
>>
>>78177101

A lot of people who don't like criticism think the criticizer should be capable of drawing as well. Which isn't true. If a chef made you a meal that was too salty, you wouldn't have to be a chef yourself to know this.
>>
>>78177226
That was always a pretty shitty analogy.
>>
>>78177226
It doesn't matter if the critic can draw or not, it matters if the critic can critique or not. If the criticism doesn't make sense, contradicts itself, or stand up to the slightest of scrutiny, then the critic should be ashamed.

People think that "criticism" is some kind of excuse to just shitpost, and they can't take what they like to dish out.
>>
>>78177250

Well some of the best sports coaches aren't former players. There's a difference between being a good artist and being a good critique of it. They can overlap but being good at one doesn't mean you're good at the other.

>>78177286

Anything can be a shitpost and it really depends on if there's anything to it. I've seen some legit criticism but framed in a way where it was just being mean for the sake of it. But it's up to the artist to be mindful of anything said about their work. It's also up to them if they want to listen or not.

Sometimes I wish artists were more self aware and stop making the same mistakes again and again. Same can be said for writers, especially really popular ones who should be fully aware of the same criticisms aimed at them time after time.
>>
>>78177213
Anon, critiques are subjective, thus arguing serves little purpose other than serving your own ego.

Man I am tired of this fucking argument. If you can't ignore comments or take a shitpost here what's going to happen if you actually get popular? What's going to happen when well know websites say something you don't like? Are you going to sperg out on your twitter about it?
>>
>>78177335
arguing with a critic servers the purpose of figuring out whether or not the critic actually has something useful to say, or is just completely full of shit.
>>
>>78177402

You wouldn't have to argue if someone points out an issue they have with and you're able to lean back and say "yeah, I see what you mean." The issue comes down to if you want to do anything about it. Because some people are aware of things that others don't like and simply don't care.

And there's nothing wrong with that.
>>
>>78177440
Using your analogy with the guy who knows nothing about food, if he says to the chef, "ew gross this dish is gross it's got fwaw gwaw in it, I don't like fish." That's not criticism. That's the guy being retarded.

If the guy says, "This dish is poorly presented and the ingredients clash improperly and over all it fails to please."

And the chef is looking right at it, and the dish is well presented, and the ingredients fuse perfectly, and it seems to him that it's the perfect dish, then the chef should probably challenge the critic. Because maybe the critic has some point the chef can't see, or maybe the critic is some retard who thinks foie gras is fish, and generally has no idea what he's talking about.

Some people think that critics' shit don't stink, and they should never be challenged. This is a fundamentally dumb idea.
>>
>>78177213
>>78177402
>critiquer
>than
>servers
>Chris-chan tier level of dealing with criticism
No, you dipshit, YOU'RE the one full of shit.
You can tell whether a given criticism is good or bad without debating the critic - trying to debate them generally usually means you're butthurt about something.

I wasn't sure whether or not to tell you to improve your spelling or to get less autistic opinions, but frankly it's in everyone's best interests if I tell you to die in a fire instead.
>>
>>78177538
"trying to debate with a critic means you're butthurt about something."

Everybody take a good look at this.
>>
>>78177530

In the end it is up to the artist to determine if the criticism is valid. If he did receive good criticism and proceeds to ignore it, he will be unable to fix that problem. We've seen plenty of artists act that way and plenty of art communities be known as hugboxes.

At the very least don't immediately dismiss criticism and give it a thought.
>>
>>78177640
Oh yeah, yeah. Hugboxes. "Listen to my criticism, because it's the holy word of god, and if you don't you're hugboxing." What a bunch of bullshit.

>At the very least don't immediately dismiss and give it a thought

Are you deaf? It's because I want criticism that I'd like to hold it to some basic standard of quality. Giving it thought is exactly what is involved with discussing and arguing over it with the guy giving the critique.
>>
File: just sayin.jpg (44KB, 310x328px) Image search: [Google]
just sayin.jpg
44KB, 310x328px
>>78177732

Then I think you're on the other side of the spectrum and are concerned about comments a bit too much. You sound very passionate about all this.
>>
>>78177732
Look dude, shit is shit. I'm tired of this attitude that criticism has to be wrapped up nicely or presented a certain way. I'm gonna be condescending, but I don't think most people here have been in a fine arts setting and realize how brutally honest it can be. I've seen people leave crits crying and it's just like haha, whatever, see you next session! Most of these folks come back next time with even stronger work because somebody was honest with them about where their work stood and didn't sugar coat it or attempt to ease the blow. Take the heat or get out of the kitchen.
>>
>>78178076
People in fine arts settings typically get criticisms from people who actually know what they're talking about, rather than edgy 12 year olds versed in all the latest memes.
>>
>>78178151
> rather than edgy 12 year olds versed in all the latest memes.

Where do you think you are?
>>
>>78178076
Honesty, however brutal, is not the same as being rude or condescending.
"Shit sux; git gud" is not considered useful criticism, not the least because it is too vague and offers no means of improvement.

What in particular is wrong with the piece under criticism? Are there fundamental errors that could be corrected? Perhaps a suggestion could be made on how the piece could be improved?

If there is no issue with HOW it is being said, then it is easier to focus on WHAT is being said.
>>
>>78178322
Sometimes everything is wrong and only being motivated by spite to improve will make you get better.
>>
>>78178479
If everything is wrong, it should be easy to come up with a valid criticism.
>>
>>78178322
>"Shit sux; git gud" is not considered useful criticism, not the least because it is too vague and offers no means of improvement.

I personally write folks paragraphs about how to possibly remedy things in their work, but I don't really worry about phrasing it gently. Por ejemplo >>78163904
>>
>>78177206
Aww sweet thanks; I'll aply it to the other page as well then.

Since we're on the topic. I definitely think people are too concerned with how the criticism is offered, rather than reading that the person has to say.

Of course, someone who says "your work is shit" has nothing to contribute, but if someone says "Your work is shit and here's why [...]", then I think it's worth reading even if you don't like the poster's attitude.
At the end of the day it's words on the internet; and the brutal honesty that comes with anonymity is something I particularly like about 4chan. Besides, if you're just doing your webcomic for yourself and don't want to improve, I have no problem with that, but I think people who want to improve should take any critique they get unless they literally get so many comments they don't have the time for it

But that's just my two cent; I'm just a smalltime artist but the reason I love these threads because they've helped me improve precisely THANKS to criticism. Of course, some people are better at writing critique than others (particularly the Sisters writer), and it's up the the artist to decide which critiques matter and which doesn't, but I tend not to argue against my critics
>>
>>78178579
"You suck" is valid. "Everything is bad" is valid.

"Loomis" is a meme for a reason.
>>
>>78178711
Loomis would think you're a retard.

You wouldn't be wrong.

Contrary to this guy

>>78178634

Nobody cares if you say something sucks and is bad.

It's why you're saying something sucks and is bad.

And more often than not, people are incapable of saying why they think something is bad, because they don't actually know what they're talking about.

Then they get all huffy that an artist dared to question their "criticism," because they made the mistake of thinking their shit don't stink.
>>
>>78178711
>Loomis is a meme for a reason.

Yeah, his books have gone public domain and people download him for free. He's not that much of an author, and I doubt most people who spam that particular meme have actually read his work, or for that matter actually draw.

Like most any other meme, it's a load of BS.
>>
>>78175643
"not again..."
How many times does has this happened to him??
>>
File: 1449800000492.jpg (63KB, 522x580px) Image search: [Google]
1449800000492.jpg
63KB, 522x580px
>>78173141
Christmas break, all the kids from summer who liked to argue are back. Ho ho ho happy holidays
>>
>>78178918
>all the kids from summer who liked to argue

I've been here for six unfortunate years and I'm tired of the shit caliber of these threads when they started off pretty well. Now that /hywc/ is more of a "community" and people can recognize each other more easily, nobody wants to critique too harshly, step on toes, or get called out like when it was wholly impersonal and nobody cared about who they pissed off or past thread grievances.
>>
>>78179053
Sounds like good times. Wish I had been here then.
>>
>>78178711
Those might be valid opinions, anon, but it's shit-tier critiquing. Unless the critic can explain why everything is bad, he's just wasting everybody's time with his bullshit.
>>
>>78178827
Loomis may be an obnoxious meme on /ic/ and he's surely overrated like he's a demigod, but Fun With a Pencil and Figure Drawing For All It's Worth are good books for beginners.
>>
>>78179276
I'd say more for the intermediate beginner, not the absolute beginner.

And the fundamental flaw in all of this is non-artists thinking that you can learn to draw out of a book.
>>
>>78179345
That's not the book's problem... Having a good instructional book to learn from or look up as reference saves you a ton of time fixing bad habits.
>>
>>78178784
>because they don't actually know what they're talking about.

I don't think this is entirely the case. You can dislike something but not be able to put into words WHY you don't like it. Some people may just not yet have the eye to discern what about a work bothers them.

I think that all criticism is valid. Even if someone says "this sucks", it's clearly coming from somewhere. It's important to find out why.

Admittedly sometimes people can not like your work based on something purely subjective, like they prefer a different genre or art style, and that can generally be dismissed. But I feel like most criticisms, however badly worded, have a nugget of truth to them somewhere.
>>
Oh how I love when two or three autists get together and derail the thread arguing with each other for 100 or 200 posts. It's so helpful for everyone else!
>>
Considering the current conversation, I'd like to recall my earlier comments about positive criticism being more helpful to some people tho

>>78171195
>>
I'm guilty of it as well but this thread has turned into many things and not so much one about webcomics.

So I guess I'll do some shameless self promotion to hopefully get it back on track. Darn.
>>
hey hotheads

get out of here
>>
>>78179601
If it's about art, it's most certainly about webcomics.

Talking about the construction of stone pillars eventually becomes about The Parthenon.
>>
>>78175246
those are some good poses. you have a knack for that
>>78175578
> i've wrote replies to him a bunch of times in addition to others explaining why, but he ignores it and continues to shit out this stuff because it requires the least amount of effort.
this is why this kind of posting is bad. you simply cannot say "i tried to help you but you didnt do what i said thus you are bad"
>>
>>78175643
woo, it was worth drawing that background!
right now the only concern is making sure the skittery spiders look suitably creepy and mass-of-spidery
>>
>>78178784
>Nobody cares if you say something sucks and is bad.

Well I don't know about you but I certainly do. I'd rather know my mistakes earlier than make several pages before I notice them
>>
>>78177226
fair enough, but there is the classic case of the person complaining their gazpacho is cold
>>
>>78178322
more to the point, honestly doesnt excuse using your opinions or even worse your emotions and presenting them as facts
>>
>>78178621
see what you did is straight up accuse the artist of lying. i can't imagine how you would think that's a good idea
if an artist said "i did this because" and you say "nuh uh you did it becuz lazy" nothing can be accomplished
>>
>>78179531
I prefer when I get negative criticism because positive criticism feels to me like I'm not getting a full, proper critique, that the person critiquing me is scared of stepping on any toes so they hold back for the sake of my feelings.

Positive criticism doesn't help me improve my comic. It makes me feel good, but it doesn't help my comic become better.
>>
>>78179443
yeah, which is why if something just 'gives me the wrong feeling' or 'i cant tell exactly what is wrong' i phrase it that way. and people usually take it a lot better
>>
File: deco.jpg (136KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]
deco.jpg
136KB, 2048x1536px
Not sure where the writefag thread is. I just found a five year old, 44 page pdf of a first draft "pilot episode" for the following idea. Tell me if this piques your interest, anon:

College campus decopunk mystery/adventure serial (think Buffy the Vampire Slayer//Twin Peaks in a world where a 'steampunk' period has come and went, college students smoke weed and listen to screwed and chopped RnB while being transported in slick streamline moderne autonomous vehicles). Character driven. 'Slice of life' moments intermixed with mystery/horror plot. Show starts with main character getting into a sorority and discovering a potential murder.

Main character and her sister both have harsh, psychedelic dreams that slowly reveal their small college town might be controlled by eldritch reality-manipulating beings.
>>
>>78179929
i think we can all agree nothing is more frustrating than getting critique on a finished page when you posted several WIPs
>>
>>78179876
Nah, I don't say "you should do this" about specifics (i.e. "you should make it X color instead of Y color") - I'll say "you could" instead. But it is objectively bad to ignore general things like "you should practice anatomy", "you should study from life", "you should learn color theory" - I'm not the only person who's said those things either.
>>
>>78180023
No I didn't. I said "it looks like you aren't even trying" because it looked to me like he wasn't trying. But I didn't say "you aren't even trying" because I knew he was, considering he colored everything else. I was letting him know what it read as, which is important when people he isn't directly communicating with are reading it and he can't explain why he did something to them.
>>
File: watamote7-1.png (385KB, 958x538px) Image search: [Google]
watamote7-1.png
385KB, 958x538px
>>78180265
>>78180341
i hate myself for writing these posts
>>
File: 7715909.jpg (47KB, 596x628px) Image search: [Google]
7715909.jpg
47KB, 596x628px
> still arguing

every single thread
>>
>>78180265
>You should learn anatomy and color theory

This is absolutely useless, garbage criticism. It's like telling somebody "you should learn how to draw."

Instead, tell them what is wrong with their anatomy and how they can fix it, etc.
>>
>>78180444
It's not 4chan without shitposting.
>>
>>78180444
romans, lmao
>>
>>78180444
I don't understand this post.

Arguments are ideas colliding.

Where's the problem?
>>
>>78180577
You shouldn't argue with critics, anon. You should only accept what they have to say, or else you'll always be a shitty 4channer.
>>
>>78180057
It definitely sounds interesting. What do you think would set this apart from every other "mystery/adventure/horror teens" comic out there? Art direction? Comedic dialogue? Setting?
>>
File: epic getaway.gif (2MB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]
epic getaway.gif
2MB, 320x180px
>waiting for the next thread to start
>>
>>78180648
How will we avoid this spilling into the next one?
>>
>>78180673
These threads tend to do a pretty good job of resetting. But there will be another horrible argument or three in the next thread.
>>
>>78180673

When this thread dies I'm not making another so naturally it'll be a couple days before someone else does.
>>
>>78180341
ah well perhaps the phrasing could have used work then
perhaps those of us calling for critique reform should take our own medicine when it comes to critiquing critique
>>
>>78180480
Somebody may not realize they even have problem with color, or have even considered it before. In today's age all you have to do is type "color theory" into google and thousands of resources come up. I can't cover color theory in a post, but I can point somebody in the right direction.
>>
>>78180829
"color theory" isn't pointing somebody in the right direction any more than just saying Loomis.
>>
>>78180708
this is sadly true, nobody else does it. i sure don't feel up to it today. fucking food assistance applications jerking me around over the course of months
>>
>>78179894
Good to know. I'll work on the spiders on the actual paper since tracing it will probably be too difficult (I'm just assuming everyone knows I draw on tracing paper for ease of making changes and figuring out space).

Also is it OK to not have the other people really care about the spiders? I guess the joke that people on nyc transit are trained to most ignore things or just flat out aren't bothered by things(due to the number of weirdos)might be lost on people not from here. I'd like to get some opinions though.
>>
>>78178878
It's New York. Weird stuff on the trains is a given. For a while certain trains had a break out of bedbugs and I've seen rats and roaches before so spiders aren't so far out of the ball park. Come to think of it, my old train station had a "pet" rat.
>>
>>78181002
yeah I just assumed they wouldn't notice it. not yet
>>
>>78180634
Greentexting these for joyous brainstorming. Sorry I'm resurrecting this thread everyone, there wasn't a place for writefags and I'm too chill to make one :^)

>Originally intended as a played-entirely-straight pastiche of paranormal serials like Charmed
>Intended as a live-action show
>Art direction of said live-action show heavily inspired by the banal uncanniness of David Lynch or Tim and Eric, but with good acting/production instead of kitschy acting/production
>Setting would be post-steampunk, shining and chrome/pewter decopunk that's moving into a biophilic/photosythesis-powered future. Lots of focus on mundane objects from this kind of universe.
>Main character is average intelligence sorority girl, played completely straight
>Her sister is a kind of evangelical Christian, played completely straight
>Designed with the idea to hypnotise an audience
>If this were a comic or cartoon it'd probably be similar to King of the Hill with grounding in reality/naturalistic characters//dialogue but with intense, horrorific elements only where absolutely necessary for a visceral response from the audience

I haven't written anything but poetry in 5 years tho lol
>>
>>78181092
brainstorming is my favorite thing in these threads
i'm not sure if a combination of intentionally-weird art direction with good performances and almost-post-steampunk would work, but that's only because of the limits of my imagination
>>
>>78180073
Sure, that's a fair point.
I mean, I don't post WiPs here anymore because I'm at the point where I'm confident enough in my art and generally the changes I do are related to colors, but that's definitely frustrating.

>>78180043
Same.
I mean, negative criticism doesn't make me feel good about my art. But if I didn't want to improve I'd just ignore it.
>>
>>78181250
ditto. if i'm doing some big thing i'm not sure about, i'll post the sketch of that panel, but typically i'm fine with just changing my stuff later if a mistake is noticed. Not exactly working with a fuckton of layers
>>
>>78179053
It could still be like that if they post as anonymous
>>
File: despair.jpg (52KB, 600x660px) Image search: [Google]
despair.jpg
52KB, 600x660px
I'm >>78174205
So, among other things, I decided to take a closer look on how off my anatomy is. I knew it's far from perfect, but I thought I'm not that bad off. So I chose an easy pose and drew it normally first (looking at the pose and hands mostly, not that much in terms of details), then traced the reference right next to it.

Holy shit. I mean it's the torso we're talking about here, the body part I was actually most confident in. The differences in curves and in the shoulder width to head ratio are astonishing. Not to mention I didn't even capture the pose, but that wasn't the main thing I wanted to do.

How the hell did I never notice that? What have I been doing all these years? I mean I don't have any aspirations towards getting good at art or anything, but the fact that so much of the basics has been going over my head for so long is frustrating. What worries me the most however is the fact that the one to the right looks more unnatural to me than the one to the left in terms of how broad shoulders are. Why? How? Am I a hopeless case or what? Ugh.

Also drawing on tablet sucks, I can't get used to it. Maybe a bigger monitor with better resolution would help.
>>
>>78180595
As long as critics are people like you and I, they are susceptible to our errors.

And can be disagreed with when its due.
>>
>>78182045
Take it easy on yourself, man, you're not nearly as bad as you think you are.
>>
>>78182045
The thing people forget sometimes is that "real life" doesnt always look "correct" when you mimic it. Good art is a mix of reality and minor changes.
>>
>>78182161
Sure, but to apply changes correctly, you need to know the reality first. If you fail the latter, you'll likely fail the former too.

Animu was a mistake. I wish the advice to learn from life first was forced into me back when I actually wanted to learn (a bit).
>>
>>78182248
Oh, of course. I wish the same anon. I wish the same. We did this to ourselves.
>>
>>78182045
you're learning bruh. better late than never. you're already further ahead than most of the people here.
>>
>>78182248
>you need to know the reality first
BULLSHIT
>>
>>78182045
it's always useful comparing your stuff to traced stuff!
torsos and elbows can be hard to wrangle.. in particular this girl's pose is kinda odd, the bent torso makes it confusing, and one of her arms is apparently being pulled back a lot based on where it rests.
so yeah like someone else said, the real-life doesn't exactly look great either. so there's room to edit stuff.
how long have you been using your tablet? they take a while to ge tused to
>>
>>78182248
>animu was a mistake
hurr. but really the face in this example looks really cute. nice eyes. maybe they should be a little further apart..
>>78182538
indeed. it depends what you're doing
>>
>>78182045
The face on the left really doesn't look that bad to be honest. There are people in this thread with webcomics who draw worse than you.

Then again, what really matters is how consistently you can draw like the one on the left, and in how many awkward angles and poses you can pull it off too.
>>
>>78182248
Don't beat yourself up so much. That hinders improvement in the long run. Sure, it gets your ass off the floor, but if you draw thinking "I suck so much all the time" you're never gonna get anywhere and you'll never feel good about anything you do.

Also, relax, a lot of us started drawing by copying anime and cartoons. You just eventually start looking at things around you and drawing them instead. Keep your eyes open when you go out, look at the way people's bodies move and the shapes on them, and make mental notes. This helps.
>>
>>78182655
I remember early on in learning to draw I drew this human studying a photo reference very carefully. After I was done I overlayed a the photo, mostly transparent, just to double check.

It was a very close match. I was worried that people would accuse me of tracing it.

Except when I posted it people accused me of really bad "clearly broken" anatomy, and I need to study more. That was when I really learned that sometimes you need to make things unrealistic to make them look realistic, and photo references aren't necessarily supposed to be followed to a t.

Incidentally, I also learned a lot about anonymous 4chan critics.
>>
>>78182744
I DID THE EXACT SAME THING.

Except I traced something deliberately to see if anyone would notice.

"Torso looks off"

Prfffff hahaha
>>
>>78182045
You're making a couple mistakes. First off, proportions are give and take. If you make something bigger, you need to make something smaller and vice versa. You increased the size of the eyes (which look less like eyes and more like symbols), and decreased the size of the nose. To help compliment those changes, you want the neck to be thinner and the arms and shoulders to be less stocky.

Every change you make in your version needs to be balanced. You can't just mindlessly make changes and say "this is manga now." In particular, you want to put more emphasis on feminine features. Narrow the waist, raise the breasts (they're a little low on the torso. They shouldn't be seated on the bottom of the ribcage.) and try to find a good ratio for women's shoulders and hips and play around that. Those can be huge determining factors for apparent age, and can make a huge difference.
>>
File: tumblr_ktfal4dSBu1qz6f4bo1_1280.jpg (220KB, 994x1280px) Image search: [Google]
tumblr_ktfal4dSBu1qz6f4bo1_1280.jpg
220KB, 994x1280px
>>78182744
Yeah, for cartooning you always want to think about clarity. You might take a reference photo and trace it as it, but it can be unclear because of the way something is foreshortened, the way tangents are produced, etc.

So many people don't get this, but you can break and exaggerate anatomy for purposes of dynamism or visual clarity, even when your style is more "realistic". But you have to make sure that exaggeration and stylization works throughout your style. You can't have a rendered face and Adventure Time noodly arms, for example. That's why artistic styles by the likes of Tradd Moore and Humberto Ramos work: everything is stylized.
>>
>>78182860
Tracing doesn't automatically make something good or visually appealing, my man.
>>
>>78182744
>>78182860
That's because photos aren't actually correct. You see the world around you with two eyes and create an image that's floating in 3d space. If your only point of reference is a 2d image, you're going to recreate it inaccurately. That's why a lot of professionals recommend life studies over photo studies, or a good mix of the two. That's not to say photo studies are bad, just that they don't focus on the same things as life studies. There are minor changes in perspective when you draw something from life that make all the difference. You're not getting true depth information when you draw from a picture.
>>
>>78183115
>You see the world around you with two eyes and create an image that's floating in 3d space.
well, some people do
>>
>>78180073
Whenever I get critique like that, I take it as "keep this in mind for next time".
>>
>>78182931
i think i prefer bad silhouettes. that's probably why i like 'bigger' and more detailed art, with more clarity and less abstract geometry
>>
Someone who isn't me needs to make the next thread. If I am forced to make it, I will intentionally fuck it up.
>>
>>78183303
I mean, part of the issue is that her tits are fake and poorly done.
>>
>>78183137
yeah but sometimes it's something obvious that you didnt see before, and it's like.. dammit, say something earlier next time so i can catch it, whattayathink i'm showing you this for
heh. drawthreads. they were fun

hey someone should get ready to make a new thread
>>
>>78183411
that and she's clearly a smoker
>>
>>78182917
>You can't just mindlessly make changes and say "this is manga now."
This one's tricky. I'd like to actually be as close to realism as possible, except the realism sometimes turns out to be not as pretty as I imagined. Also manga has a lot of different styles (which is less apparent in anime), so what really defines what "manga" is? Apart from the country of origin I suppose. Making it more visually appealing for the target demographics doesn't necessarily mean you are now drawing manga, and vice versa.

I get what you mean though, my breast placement is wrong and I know it. As far as waist goes, I'm trying to escape from twigs I used to draw, but then again, I'm not really practicing, just drawing a bit every now and then, so the learning process is extremely slow. Thanks for the advice though!

>You increased the size of the eyes (which look less like eyes and more like symbols), and decreased the size of the nose. To help compliment those changes, you want the neck to be thinner and the arms and shoulders to be less stocky.
Why? I mean, what's the thought process behind this? Are there some golden ratios I don't know about or is it your personal experience?
>>
File: 1371056096636.gif (543KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]
1371056096636.gif
543KB, 500x250px
>>78182970
Aappappapapapapap
Nanananananonono.

When they said it looked off, they said the anatomy was WRONG.

"Torsos don't work this way"

This woman happened to be squatting in a peculiar way. I picked it specfically to test what they knew about how the body bent. And they failed.

You gotta quit defending shitty critics. There are shitty ones.

Just admit it. That's all I want.

There are shitty critics.

Say it.

SAY IT.
>>
>>78183528
yeah i think that person is wrong about changing up the bodily ratios. I actually like your mix of 'realistic silhouette, prettier features'
but as i said earlier, eyes should be an eye-width apart, so if you give her approximately Tenchi style eyes like this, you have to pay attention to how the eye-spacing works in that style. Nudge her left eye over slightly and I think you'd be in fine shape (for one thing her eyes seem to be at more of an angle than the rest of her head. that guy is quite wrong in saying theyre like symbols since they clearly show angle-turning)
>>
File: 14376224794.jpg (64KB, 956x631px)
14376224794.jpg
64KB, 956x631px
>>78183613
Do you have a single proof to back that up?
>>
>>78179225
>Unless the critic can explain why everything is bad, he's just wasting everybody's time with his bullshit.

What time? It's a bigger waste of time to point by point critique an individual piece when what the artist needs is practice.

>>78183137
Yeah. This. While is is annoying if you could have used the info before, it's probably not intentionally late, and is probably applicable to the future.

Tying these responses together: That's probably the real problem with a lot of people here. They think they need each pieces to be great and want to work on it for far longer than it should be instead of thinking "I'll be better in 5 pages."
>>
>>78183528
I'd say it's a style the rests around changes to specific proportions with emphasis on specific features like the eyes and nose with a limitless amount of variation left to personal 'flavor'. Finding what works for you is fine, but knowing the difference between drawing symbols and drawing something stylized is really, really important.

Yes, there are golden ratios. The current, most popular ratio is based around phi. I'll draw an example in the next thread, but most american animation studios are also trying to follow it. Bugs Bunny, most Pixar films, and a lot of Disney films follow closely to it. Anime follows the same ratio but with different emphasis.

>>78183626
Symbols can turn in space, that doesn't make them less of a symbol. You think I'm wrong because of your personal opinion, I think you're wrong because math.
>>
>>78183642
What's this meme called?
>>
>>78183613
Do you happen to have that trace lying around? It probably looked wrong because it was traced like shit, or the reference was weird-looking initially. Pic related. Look at that stubby fuckin' hand.

Also of course there are shitty critics.
>>
>>78183716
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xZcx0BR2ySA
>>
Don't you hate it when you go through the effort of telling a critic what's wrong with his critiquing, and all he says is "it's my style?" It's like they're intent on remaining youtube comment-tier cringey.
>>
>>78183686
>there are golden ratios
this is true
>pixar and old WB used them
nnno.. disney did though. WB did stuff more like "hey let's make this character look like a clown!" pixar just takes a model of a face and stretches and warps it like mario's face on the title screen
>symbols can turn
riiiight.
>>
>>78183724
the problem there is if you're going to tilt a hand in that direction, you have to draw the distal and proximal palmar creases
>>
>>78183724
No, I do not. These was years and a computer ago.
>>
>>78183930
this is beautiful
>>78183942
0/10
>>
>>78184016
The original image's foreshortening is the weird part. Makes the arm look all stupid.
>>
>>78184049
well not exactly, though the combination of creases is most unfortunate
it's all about choosing which lines to emphasize. I think we all go through a too-many-lines phase when we get good and observant, and the hard part is learning WHICH lines to use
in this case for example, leaving out her outer-nostril line makes her nose look significantly more narrow because your eye assumes that not emphasizing it meant it wasn't that important.
>>
>>78184131
Y'know what, yeah, you're making some pretty good points there.
>>
File: file.png (2MB, 1070x747px) Image search: [Google]
file.png
2MB, 1070x747px
>>78183987
Yes, a symbol can be drawn turning. Kids do it all the time, along with amateur artists. Just because it's "turning" doesn't mean it's not a symbol.
"Oh look, their eyes are turned in space, must not be a symbol," doesn't cut it. There's a difference between drawing something to follow a surface and drawing something turning just because it should be.

And yes, Bugs Bunny along with several other Hannah Barbara and WB characters, as well as a large majority of recent Pixar characters, all follow closely to "puppy" proportions.
>>
File: secret identity.png (348KB, 1246x672px) Image search: [Google]
secret identity.png
348KB, 1246x672px
So, I tried to Gimp again.

I am kind of getting hand on it.

Layers keep on screwing me over.
>>
>>78184574
they really do not follow the proportions of any real animals. youre confusing a ratio with a vague on-paper description of the ratio of features
as for the first paragraph neither of us has any idea what you are talking about
>>
>>78184576
this is already an improvement, good sir. work on cleaning up those little white bits and this will be an instant improvement.
as for the rest, put a nice sketched out model on an underneath layer and it will help you keep stuff more even
layers can be confusing so I suggest starting out with JUST two layers. One underneath for 'stuff you arent going to keep' and one above for stuff you are. Then once you get more used to that, try having a separate line layer
>>
>>78184628
I don't think you understand the word "ratio." Don't speak for the rest of the board when you're the one that's clearly having trouble understanding.
>>
File: Untitled.png (28KB, 851x803px) Image search: [Google]
Untitled.png
28KB, 851x803px
>>78184663

Inking is a son of a bitch.

But if it make you happy and going to get me more views. I going to do it.
>>
Is someone going to make a thread?
>>
>>78184731
>i think you're wrong because math
but you're giving examples of vague poorly-done concepts, not actual number ratios. YOU don't know what a ratio is
>>
>>78184890
yeah anon! you are!
i looked ahead in the script. it turns out it's you!
>>
>>78185099
Wrong script.
>>
>>78185068
That's because no one sits down and measures out phi exactly before they start drawing something. It's used as a reference. The fact that you think somehow drawing with a ratio would make everything look exactly the same shows that you haven't a clue what you're actually dealing with. Stop feeding people bad opinions and advice when all you're going to do is stifle their improvement. You're not helping anyone or anything beyond your own fucking massive ego.
>>
>there are people, alledgedly over the age of 18, who don't know what ratios are

This shouldn't surprise or disappoint me, but it still does.
>>
>>78185204

Oh shut the fuck up.

You are not the smartest anon in 4chan.
Thread posts: 544
Thread images: 83


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.