Best gin coming through
>2015 IWSC Trophy
https://www.iwsc.net/result/search/2015/15?q=gin&type=&category=&variety=&origin=&award=&purchasable=
There are literally hundreds of gins that got a trophy.
Is this "trophy for attendance" shit now covers drinks too?
>>9418074
What do you mean "now"? It's always been like that.
>>9418045
>someone fucked up the layout for the label with his/her bachelor of arts social women studies degree, so they decided to go with it for the final product
Millenials are truly subhuman. The only thing missing in that picture is an avocado sandwich
This is really fugging good
Recently got a hold of one of these, didn't disappoint.
>>9418106
Sometimes I think I'm bitter to the point of being dysfunctional
Then I see posts like this and I'm grateful to be a normie
>>9418106
This is the sort of autistic shitfit I'd expect from /v/
>>9418045
Other gins need not apply
Is The Botanist gin good? I really like how the bottle looks. Also, what are the best gin drinks?
>>9418179
Do you add anything to yourG&T? Rosemary, etc?
Move aside gin plebs,
KINOBI dry gin distilled in Kyoto has been awarded a Gold Medal in the ‘Contemporary Gin’ category at the 2017 IWSC awards. Score of 90-92.9
Gin and soda water is superior to G&T
>>9418117
Why are there so many gin producers in Berlin? Including this one i can allready name three from the top of my head (Adler and Mampe beeing the other two).
>>9418074
There's just too many awards for any of them to have much meaning on their own.
Also, unsurprisingly, OP is a faggot for trying to talk objectively about taste. I mean imagine being so narrow minded as to not see that various gins with various flavour profiles hit differently on different pallets, and go together differently well with other ingredients.
>>9418159
Gimlet, Tom Collins, Slings, Bucks, Old Fashioned, Martinis (of all variants), Negroni, Fizzes, White Lady, Oldschool Cosmopolitans...
Try them all, anon. Try them all with all the different gins. You know you want to...
>>9421272
Someone has a bad taste in gin
>>9421459
Oh hi OP!
> Me: *Makes a statement unrelated to what kind of gin I like or whether Napue is good or not*
> You: "Whaah! How dare you call me out on presenting my subjective opion as objective fact (and possibly being so insecure as to have to define myself by 'muh patrician taste')! Bad taste REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
>>9421509
Who hurt you anon?
>>9421534
> gets mad at the "OP a faget"-meme
> ad hominems about taste without literally any information about said taste in response
> gets called out on this
> "Lol who hurt you anon?"
>>9421582
Sleep my friend, you will feel better when you have a good rest. Calm your anger, its just a good gin we are talking about
>>9421615
You know, anon, maybe I should. I sincerely hope your thread comes back on track. Enjoy your Napue. Although I disagree with the idea of taste being objectively definable, I must have forgotten where I am.
Before I go, have you ever had a Sloe Gin, Old Tom or Genever, and if so, how where they? Being a university poorfag, I don't get to try around the top shelf a lot. I'm sure there's some really good stuff up there.
>>9421659
I've only had Bols genever and it was fine, though a bit too fruity for me (still have it in the shelf though).
In old toms I have tasted counter and haymans. Counter was refreshing due to it being a bit more herbal and I do not remember what Haymans tasted like.
I dont recall ever dringking Sloe gin