Huh well ok then

>>9340707
water is a chemical dumb cunt haha

*I'm allergic to chemicals*
>Dies

File: Silicoid_MOO1_Diplomacy.png (7KB, 320x130px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 320x130px

I'm not allergic to chemicals, so I eat only non-organic food.

>>9340707
Isnt fucking water a chemical too?

Everything's a fucking chemical

>>9342580
Obviously all diet needs must be catered to everything.
We have to ban all things so nobody gets hurt.

>>9342499
water is a molecule, it is elemental

>>9342637
What are you trying to say

File: goldenbean.png (44KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 200x200px

As soon as the topic of 'organic' comes up (read: no pesticides, insecticides, defoliants, miraclegrow, etc. used on them), everyone thinks they're a fucking biochemist.

>Ahve been eatin from walmard half mah natural born lahf and ah aint dead yet, aint nothin wrong with a chemical. these damn left wingers just tryin to sell us a crock uh shit Marlene now dont you go buyin that 'organic' dawgshit again you hear me woman? Aint you know everythings a damn chemical?

Here are a few publications for you pigfuckers, if you're even capable of interpreting them.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9498903

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2231435/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955666/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4020505/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23184105

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21368619

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21601587

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15236951

File: 1502161094796.jpg (3MB, 3892x2783px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3892x2783px

>>9342499
I am a biochemist.
We do not refer to water as a chemical. 'Chemical' is used both colloquially and in chemistry to mean a compound that's artificially produced. While that is vaguely technically true per the definition, as a chemist, if you were to call water a 'chemical' in the lab and it wasn't made from H, O2 and electricity, everyone would look at you like you were retarded and maybe go call up your alma mater to make sure you really graduated. Water is referred to as a molecule.

>>9340707
Not everything is a chemical faggots. Still though. I hope you get hit by a bus chemical.

>>9342753
I am a car salesman
Surely as a chemist you recognize the distinction between chemical/molecule is an arbitrary one and just because something isn't a chemical doesn't mean it's better for you and vice versa.

File: 1503236453648.jpg (54KB, 450x285px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 450x285px

>>9342731
>Being so fucking stupid that you think it's a left/right issue

Kill yourself faggot and take Obama's Monsanto-cock-sucking ass with you.

>>9342753
> 'Chemical' is used both colloquially and in chemistry to mean a compound that's artificially produced.
You're a shit biochemist if you believe that.

>>9342753
This poster is bullshitting, we do indeed refer to water as a chemical. Method of synthesis has nothing to do with calling something a chemical.

Unless of course, that anon is not actually an English speaker; maybe the nomenclature is different in for'n parts.

>>9342783
>chemical/molecule is an arbitrary one
Abritrary perhaps, but still valid.

Consider the term "poison". We don't call water poison, even though you can die from drinking too much of it. So yeah, the term "poison" is arbitrary too. But you don't go around consuming thinks marked "poison", do you?

Generally speaking, in the context of food, anything that we call a chemical by our arbitrary definition is probably not good for you. That's the point of calling it a chemical. Arbitrary? Sure. Be we all know what it means.

And you're absolutely right that just because something is "natural" rather than a "chemical" doesn't mean it is safe. Snake venom and hemlock are both "natural" but you don't want either one in your body.

>>9342806
Yes, I don't disagree. But my problem is when marketers or activist use the term 'chemical,' vaguely to crtitisize or promote a product. Certain chemicals are bad for you, certain ones aren't. Certain chemicals are only bad for you if you consume too much or in combination with something else.

I just hate the psychology of marketing. And how gullible the population is to it.

>>9342860
>>9342731

Do you think these articles are fake or something? Why does it matter if they say 'chemical' or not, that's what it is, we all know what it means, and those "chemicals" cause cancer. If it were an issue of misleading customers of fake science, sure, argue about the word, but a ton of pesticides are known carcinogens.

>>9342637
>water is elemental
No, it's a combination of two elements dipshit

>>9343063
oohhh, the faggot was trying to use semantics so I followed suit. Water is elemental, suck my dick.

>>9342499
It is an organic chemical

>>9343113
Nope, no carbon bonds, not organic

>>9340707
>im allergic to chemicals
>dies

>>9343063
if we are gonna be assholes, then fuck you, hydrogens are really just protons. its questionable whether you can compare it to something like an actual element like oxygen

>>9343146
Your mother is an electron, and my cock is a proton, she orbits around it.

>>9343152

can i be the neutron bb ;)