>Eating too much >Eating too little Which is worse, /ck/?

Too little. You can just exercise those extra calories off depending on how much you ate extra.

>>9249494
Depends on what you are eating (doing)

When you eat too much your stomach hurts, but at least you're satisfied with what you've eaten. When you eat too little, you keep hungry and you regret that you didn't eat more. So, yeah, eating too little is worse.

>>9249508
Also pic is obviously opposite

>>9249494
They'll get soggy too fast if you do what's in the lower pic. Also, how much of a fat piece of shit am I for dunking and eating 2 Oreos at a time?

Eating too little is worse but eating too much is easier.

>>9249508
Overall of course. Too little food or too much food.

>Not putting an entire sleeve of Oreos into a large cup, pouring a little bit of milk over it then crushing the Oreos up with a spoon and eating the paste

Try it some time, you'll thank me.
Add more milk to change the thickness.

>>9249547
>Not liking a mix of soggy and crunchy

Basic-ass motherfucker.

>>9249577
Don't hate me because you can't handle the FUTURE, peasant.

>>9249494
eating too much. eating too little will correct itself. while eating too much is a snowball down a steep slope

Eating too little is worse, but eating too much is more of an issue in the modern world.

>>9249629
Dainty manlet detected.

depends on what too little means

eating at a slight caloric deficit is actually better for your health and longevity

>>9249494
too much. Eating at a caloric deficit for prolonged period of time actually reduces aging.

As someone who went from 1 extreme to another eating too little is worse.
Anorexia is far more dangerous than obesity.

Eating little but that isnt a excuse to be a fatty