with or without beans, ck.
>>9202482
Yes.
Inb4 300 replies
Yep
>>9202482
Either or, I don't care. I usually do it without beans though. If I don't love it, it typically doesn't go in the chili.
Chili doesn't have beans. If it has beans it's a stew. That said, there are some good stews out there.
This is the preferred technique >>>>>9198023
with
>>9202501
any stew based on chili peppers and meat can be considered chili
>Cubed meat - no beans
>Ground beef - beans
Unless it's a hot dog chili in which case no beans.
>>9202482
I am from New England.
I like it with beans.
>>9202517
i literally was just about to post this
No beans if it is going to be topping something, with beans if it is going to be just eaten out of a bowl itself.
With beans of course since they are cheap and I am poor
>>9202516
>any stew based on chili peppers and meat can be considered chili
Err, logic doesn't work like that, because every single mexican or asian soup would be chili in that case.
Beans if I'm going to eat it from a bowl. No beans if I'm making burritos as I'll make refried beans and slather them on the tortilla before adding the chili. Eating a meat only stew from a bowl is disgusting.
Chili can be made without beans? I just realized I don't know what chili is.
>>9202517
That is acceptable, in that ground beef chili is dogshit tier so who cares what else you toss in that slop.
>>9202482
It's good either way.
It's not chili without beans. This isn't a debate. If you said otherwise, you're wrong and probably a toddler.
>>9202685
>trying to scientifically classify food recipes
I hope I never become this autistic.
>>9202517
This is it, the ultimate correct chili post to end all chili posts
>>9202482
I make it without. I don't care enough to not eat it if it has beans.