Coke No Sugar

>>9082831
Why are they in red bull cans?

I have not tried it but the answer is no. Why do people even care about sugar when they are choosing to drink sugar water?

>>9082882
the calories probably

>>9082831
It's completely different

>>9082918
how?

>>9082831
You mean coke zero?

>>9083011
https://www.coca-cola.com.au/en/new-coke-no-sugar/?gclid=CPTc35jq0tQCFdd5vQodU3MCJw

>>9082831
No sweetener at all? Am intrigued but would probably be pretty gross.

>>9083014
Sweeteners (951, 950)
>aspartame and acesulfame potassium
Literally coke zero my friend.

File: ss+(2017-06-23+at+11.40.00).png (28KB, 823x169px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 823x169px

>>9083020

>>9083023
Changing the flavorings aside from intensifying them won't cover up the aftertaste that remains with the two sweeteners used. But who knows maybe I'm wrong.

>>9083038
Yeah I haven't personally tried it myself, decided to read up on it cos of this thread

haven't had a diet soda that I've enjoyed yet so I have my doubts

>>9083052
They're obviously not sure of it themselves given they released it to a small market, but Coke Zero can be good if you put a splash of vanilla extract in it.

>selling point is a healthier no sugar version of coke
>add sweeteners 950 and 951 (aspartame and acesulphame potassium) which is actually worse than sugar

>>9083087
>>which is actually worse than sugar

>FDA passed it as safe numerous times

sweetener memes

>>9083087
>aspartame and acesulphame potassium
>worse than sugar
lapping up sugar industry propaganda

good goyim

>>9083092
(((FDA)))
>>9083094
>lapping up anti sugar "healthier alternative" propoganda
keep pouring on that splenda goyim!

>>9083108
approved in 90 different countries ! Who are these sweetener decryers? Sad!

>>9083020
coke claims that they spent 5 years altering the coke zero recipe. although >>9083038 is right, the coke zero is pretty much indistinguishable from regular coke when its in your mouth but has that terrible aftertaste, i dont see how the new coke can fix that.

they are apparently phasing out coke zero here to replace with this. ill buy a can to try it

>>9083322
>Collected two (You)s from one post
Yiss

>>9082831
It's sweetened with aspartame and sucralose, same as the other diet Cokes, you fat fucking loser. Aren't you at all ashamed of your shitty lifestyle choices?

>>9083322
The cherry zero aftertaste isn't nearly as bad, fwiw.

File: 3_cans.png (188KB, 360x320px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 360x320px

Soft drink related, how many of you can actually taste the difference between coke and pepsi?

>>9083649
It's very easy. Pepsi is sweeter than coke and tastes like...well Pepsi.

>>9083649
for me coke just seems to have a bigger bite on it. But thats just me

Anything that is "no sugar" but a primarily sugar product never tastes like the original thing.
It never will.
Stop trying.
Aspartame tastes like shit.

>>9083654
>>9083655

Have you guys ever done blind taste tests? Looking at the ingredients Pepsi has slightly more sugar and salt but the only thing I seemed to notice was that Pepsi was flatter/lost carbonation faster

Also have you had any experiance with crystal pepsi?

>>9083649
Pepsi is made locally in my city and it has a far more distinct taste than Coca-Cola, both normal and "original formula" versions.

>>9083717
Is this like the cane sugar issue americans have with Coke?

File: 1464280640937.gif (58KB, 132x140px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 132x140px

>>9082873
They started selling coke in those smaller 25cl cans not long ago but still sell the 33cl ones in sixpacks.
Is it so that people don't drink as much or is it just jewery?

>>9083347
Matches ya dubs anon.