Thoughts on my steaks?

they look too done

>>9021661
They aren't.

>>9021664
show us the inside then

do it bitch

>>9021665
They've already been eaten.

>>9021670
so you like your steaks medium well then?

>>9021674
They were medium rare.

>>9021670
with lots of sauce i may add. meat was a littlr dry for my taste

>>9021675
they were fucking well done and you know it

next time take a photo and try not to burn your steaks

File: IMG_0023.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>9021683
Fuck you. These were the biggest scraps left. Does that look medium well to you? Ignore the dumb paper towel my dumb wife bought.

>>9021687
Yes it looks medium well. Does the vine make it harder to eat or is that removed before serving?

File: IMG_0022.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>9021708
It's pink you cunt.

>>9021715
Shit, you're right. I had my display colors set for a darker room. Switched em back and it's pink. Looks good.

>>9021725
Thanks.

>>9021715
Looks like you cooked them while they were still fridge temperature.

>>9021735
That's a myth.

I think I shall deep fry a steak one day

>>9021747
That's called fondue.

>>9021658

I think they look very good. I prefer mine medium rare (a little more pink than you seemed to have cooked). I say this because they are typically more moist like that, I hate eating "dry" meat.

wouldeat/10

What did you have it with?

>>9021770
THEY ARE MEDIUM RARE REEEEEEEEEEEEE
baked potatoes and a salad

>>9021750
interesting assessment, however does anybody actually fry a whole steak or always in chunks?

>>9021781
I've never seen anyone deep fry an actual steak, just chunks.

>>9021658
>Cooking on aluminium
Enjoy your alzheimers.

>>9021823
then gentlemen, it seems we have work to do

>>9021670
Why the fuck would you bother to make a thread to show off your steaks and not do a pic of the insides?

>>9021850
I didn't think to make a thread about it until today.

>>9021842
That's actually a myth. It was found in one study that there was a little extra aluminum in the brains of Alzheimers. One study. It was also disproved and ruled coincidental.

File: 1489103489583.png (490KB, 449x401px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 449x401px

>>9021747
>>9021823
>he's never had a chicken fried steak

>>9021964
>That's actually a myth. It was found in one study that there was a little extra aluminum in the brains of Alzheimers

Maybe they got hit in the head with a baseball bat

>>9021964
>That's a myth. It was found in one study that there was a little extra aluminium in the brains of alzheimers
Wrong.
>https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/02/140212093300.htm
Elevated brain aluminium, early onset Alzheimer's disease in an individual occupationally exposed to aluminium

>https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21157018
1) very small amounts of Al are needed to produce neurotoxicity and this criterion is satisfied through dietary Al intake, 2) Al sequesters different transport mechanisms to actively traverse brain barriers, 3) incremental acquisition of small amounts of Al over a lifetime favors its selective accumulation in brain tissues, and 4) since 1911, experimental evidence has repeatedly demonstrated that chronic Al intoxication reproduces neuropathological hallmarks of AD.

>https://www.hindawi.com/journals/ijad/2011/276393/
Recent studies using mass spectrometry of 26Al have demonstrated that small, but a considerable amount of Al crosses the blood brain barrier, enters into the brain, and accumulates in a semipermanent manner

>http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-11692008000100023
In spite of existing polemics all over the world about the role of Al as a risk factor for AD, in recent years, scientific evidence has demonstrated that Al is associated with the development of AD.

Every single study says the same thing at the end: "Avoid aluminium absorption through dietary restriction"