Is there an appreciable health difference between whole milk and 2%?

The 2% knows too much

>>8579072
Depends on your dietary needs. If you have a low fat diet and a lack of protein and you have the calories to spare whole is a better choice. If you already eat a lot of fat or are watching your calories then go with 2%. For most people the difference is pretty negligible.

>>8579072
Whole milk is usually around 3.25% fat so yeah 1% is closer to 2% than 2% is to homo milk.

Whole milk tastes gooder

They put a bunch of sugar in 2%

>>8579072
Roughly twice the fat, roughly twice the flavor.

>>8579272
t. Jack Scalfani

>>8579072
Easy to find out yourself. Just go look at the nutrition info on a bottle of each. You'll find the fat and calorie amounts per serving don't really change that much.

>>8579272
No? There's a large amount of fat in milk so if you remove that then obviously a larger proportion of the calories will then come from the sugar which was already present. I think the protein content is about the same.

File: Capture.png (25KB, 623x172px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 623x172px

>>8579319

re: op's pic.
Eh, there I hoped for genuine SJW insanity and it's merely successful trolling.

>>8579336
In no way does that refute what I said. I acknowledged the higher proportion of sugar in low-fat milk. You claimed that sugar was added.

>>8579336
What country is this, America? Where I live all the milk has the same amount of sugar, just the fat is different.
Only chocolate milk has added sugar.

File: lonely-bday.png (268KB, 484x336px) Image search: [Google]

268KB, 484x336px

>drinking watered down pissmilk whose fat content has already been skimmed off to make butter/cream

people who do this are absolute idiots.

>>8579343
>re:
>Eh
You've lost the plot.

>>8579072
"Whole" milk is only 3% fat. On it's face, there's not a whole lot of difference nutrition-wise.
Some people find whole milk will help keep them fuller longer.

>>8579072
Wtf I love milk now
14/88