Would you ever a chef's knife just because it was pretty?

>>8474065
no

No because I get far more enjoyment being a contrarian against that sort of thing.

A knife being "pretty" is weird, though. If an ugly knife is still an extremely good knife, doesn't its ugliness become attractive? If it's physically deformed it's just a shitty tool, period. Otherwise, I don't see how you can make it ugly without betraying the naturally beneficial sleekness of most knives.

>>8474065
No but I would not use (own) a knife if it was very ugly. Also you accidentally a word in there buddy.

>>8474195

He did not. You just can't into proper memery.

>>8474209
Looks like you got metamemed brah

>>8474065
Looks like Razr is getting into the cutlery business.

What about reversing the question, would you prefer to have a really good knife that was also pretty over another knife that is only a really good knife?