You know if this were the 1950's you'd love to be a

>>8440803
women still love to be at home
As the number "working" increases they take anti-depressants, eat badly and drink more.

File: 1478503350237.png (80KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 500x501px

>>8440806
This is obviously because women are worse at work and not because of the transparency of emotions over the internet and economic pressures

>>>/r9k/

>>8440806
So just like the men? Yay for equality!

I think I have a problem, my fellow co/ck/s. I think I have the hots for the absolute batshit insane feminist type of women. Do I want to be emotionally abuse?

>>8440811
men who stay at home more than their wives are are as unhappy as "working" women?

>>8440810
It's not bait if it's true shitlips.

File: Thefedora.jpg (190KB, 1067x800px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1067x800px

>>8440816

>>8440803
Nah. If you didn't go to college, you miss out on the humanities that leads to some personal happiness and well adjustedness. Try hanging with wives of military dudes ripped out of Appalachia and see if you have shit to talk about with the other wives, other than Jerry Springer and Kardashians or child rearing. At that point, your whole life is your husband and not much else, and then you're boring to him and you'd feel like a loser when you hung out with dual-income couples.
Don't romanticize hollywood's interpretation of 50s housewives. They were under quite a bit of in-their-place control, especially when your money isn't what you brought to the table.
If you're wealthy, you're likely hanging out with other higher education types who quit college for their spouses, where you could work, but you didn't have to work, so your free time is your organized bridge games, country clubs and tennis, organizing charity events, cocktail parties, raising your children with boarding school, and it's okay at that point somewhat, but part of what makes a person happy is their self-satisfaction, and it can be harder to achieve without a career.

>>8440828
So marry a rich man, gotcha.

>>8440828
How does this apply to LGBT couples including transgender women and men?

I predict that trans women are going to be in that in-their-place control as a man will have a transwife to serve him while he has his true female partner.

>>8440828
>you'd feel like a loser when you hung out with dual-income couples.
Caring for a man's house and children while he protects the general population is not losing.