people with dietary restrictions are a failure as a species
"people with dietary restrictions" is not a species.
>>8387558
are you saying this knowing full well that humans weren't originally lactose tolerant?
>>8387558
Saw one of my ex'es dating a guy like 4 years older than her, I was kinda happy for her since she seems to dig abusive relationships.
>he was gluten free
Instantly felt bad for that stupid whore. I feel bad for the unproprtionally small amount of penis she will be recieving. I feel terrible for her kids who will likely come out as autistic beta faggots.
>>8387558
They should be euthanised or sterilised
>>8387660
Does he have celiac disease or is he just a dumb faggot
>>8387558
imho would not adopt dog with food allergy
>>8387647
Wew lad
What? lol that does not even make sense.
You have an ugly mind op. It is probably clogged up with so many undigested bad food.
>>8388506
It makes plenty of sense. If the vast majority of people can eat a food with no problem but a certain individual cannot eat it then how is that anything other than a failure? It doesn't mean that person is worthless in general, but allergies or intolerances are certainly small localized failures.
>>8387649
All baby mammals, including humans are lactose tolerant.
>>8387558
>one small segment of the population of a species is now considered a separate species.
Waat?
I hate dietary restrictions too. People should be able to eat other people, the weak are there to prove the strength of the strong.
>>8388515
You seem to be focusing on the term "species". Stop.
Focus instead on the individuals who are failures because of their digestive problems.
>>8388561
>focus instead on morons who obsess about the psychological or physical idiosyncrasies of other people.