Can Villeroy and Bach china be frozen?

*Boch

>>8303746
I guess so.

>>8303746
Everything in the universe can be frozen given a low enough temperature so I guess yeah

>>8303772
>Everything in the universe can be frozen given a low enough temperature
What about Bose–Einstein condensate?

>>8303746
Potter here. I'm going to assume this is a bone china. Bone china is a highly vitrified non-plastic kaolin casting slip fluxed with bone ash. Because it is so non-porous and glassy, there shouldn't be any water absorption through the unglazed portion on the foot. Therefore, when put in the freezer there won't be any water inside the ceramic itself that could expand and crack the piece.

However, putting a hot piece of bone china in the freezer, or taking a very cold piece out of it and putting it straight into a warm over could thermal shock the piece and crack it. It is also possible that if you filled a closet-over, spherical piece like a teapot with water and froze it, the water could expand as it turns to ice and crack it.

Now if this is not actually bone china, but a conventional porcelain casting clay body, it will be slightly more porous and in a perfect storm of circumstances may eventually crack through repeated freezing and thawing cycles.

So yeah, you can do it 99 out of 100 times, but it's probably not the best idea if it's not something you care to risk.

>>8303782
>what is 0°K

>>8304217
Good god. How do you hold that much irrelevant information in your brain at a single instance in time?

>>8304222
Einstein-Bose condensate only exists for temperatures below 10−7 K. That's
0,000001 K
So no, I don't think it will freeze at any possible temperature.

>>8304280
I guess you accumulate knowledge in your field over time. I thought it was relevant to the topic.