>What the fuck is wrong with Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee,

I don't think that pic is accurate.

>>8195722
I live in Oregon, WTF is this based on?

>>8195748
It says on the bottom.
Data comes from a nationwide online survey with a sample size of 40,000. Pretty shitty sample size for a nation with over 300 million people in it.

>>8195751
and 40,000 is actually quite large for a poll sampling

polls are fucking garbage

>>8195722
Actually surprised to see LA as Swedish Fish. Everyone i know hates that shit....I love it

WAfag here. Forgot airheads were even a thing

candy corn is amazing, no regrets

>>8195722
Vermont is the only state with good taste.

>>8195722
Probably better idea would be to track candy sales from major retailers than a poll tbqh

>>8196253
oh, here we are
https://www.statista.com/statistics/189714/top-snack-size-chocolate-candy-brands-in-the-united-states/

File: 123124.png (15KB, 764x514px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 764x514px

>>8196258

For a long ass time I thought everyone liked candy corn, didn't know it was infamous as black licorice. Weird feel desu.

t. Texan

>>8195751
Anything above a 1000 is pretty accurate for a large sample size. 100 is considered a small sample size. This is what we covered in my college Stat class.

>>8195751
>hur dur why couldn't they have a sample size of 150 million
Did you even go to school?

>Toblerone
How queer