Does expensive food really tastes better than cheap food?

>generalizations made by nobody, ever

Yes, thanks to the placebo effect

it's true when it comes to meat.

expensive cuts are expensive because they're in high-demand due to tastiness.

Stands to reason that good tasting food takes more time and effort to produce, and thus more money.

post-purchase rationalization

>>7122257

That's why the least tasty part of the chicken is the most expensive, right?

>>7122263
It's lean that's why, fat tastes good, get the thighs.

>>7122257
>expensive cuts are expensive because they're in high-demand due to tastiness.
Confirmed to not know shit about shit

>>7122278
The thighs are marginally more calorie dense

>>7122247
Not always dumbtard. But can happens sometimes

>>7122247
Sometimes it tastes really unlike anything else, but not necessarily better. Its just refreshing to taste something thats different.

Depends..

Meat: Almost always.

Veggies: If price is tied to freshness, yes, if tied to how much poison it was grown in, no.

Spices: Sometimes (cheaper dried spices tend to have more stalk/filler).

Restaurant food: Depends greatly on the place. Cost of meal is usually a mixture of actual food / skill used to prepare it and other non-food related stuff (fancier shit, snootier waiters, whatever). Generally pricier places have better food, but there is certainly a point of diminishing return.