Why have reductions in labor hours not kept track with increases in efficiency?
Congress made the 40 hour work week a law in 1940. That's almost a hundred years ago. Compare that to the period 1840-1940 where you started out at 6 days a week 14/hrs day potentially.
Why has progress stagnated?
>people keep working to buy more stuff anon
And? Standard of living from 1815-1940 rose along with reduction in labor times. What gives now?
>see picture
I'm not American
Don't think too much about it, goy. Just keep wagecuc- I mean, "working" for your corporate masters
>>3461429
Cant afford to give people raises or let them work less for the same money because CEOs and Lobbyists are expensive.
>>3461429
If you worked 40 hours a week on your own business, no matter what it is, you would be making double within a year or two
>>3461491
looool
>>3461491
Yea thats easy to say, but not everyone has the skills. My skill is so niche and the market for this is very specific that i cannot utilize it as a business, so im stuck.
pls send help, i want to be free
>>3461491
I know I wouldnt be spending 30hrs doing other shit like surfin /biz
>>3461429
I worked for 1 days once. It was awful. Im almost 30
It's funny because if I was working less hours I'd be more productive but i do 45-50 hours a week and milk it
>>3461429
who still works 40 hours though? in most office jobs you can just sit on your phone or hang out with coworkers most of the day. only service and research *requires* 40 hours, because the law says 40 and you want to maximize output. but in those jobs most people work more than 40 lol.
40 was decided as a fair number. that has nothing to do with "progress." french people work less but their businesses are garbage quality.
>>3461429
Because capitalism is a lie, anon.
>>3461769
> government mandated overtime pay and benefits after crossing and arbitrary line
> capitalism
ayy