Forex

>>3434176
0.9 you lose everything in the first 3 months.

>But my 1:1000
If you win you are said to invest said earning in orders again. So you can be a millionaire in their balance but a loser in real life.

Now suppose you are lucky (its unpredictable most times) or good at TA, they will fuck up their platform backing you to cash out unless you lose a little bit (62 hours of freezing if necessary) or cancelling your contract.

Every Forex dont have fiat or contract at all, they just bet against you.

>>3434483
I was just trying to debunk one myth that's commonly repeated here over and over that it's slow baby gains for or only for grandpa and so on.

>>3434502
it is slow baby gains compared to crypto you dumbass lmao
you can 100x margin trade crypto on bitmex too

Nothing wrong with trading forex. I made my first 200k with forex

>>3434176
Just looked at some historical charts and your strategy doesn't work for shit mate, like, literally, 5% of times it even goes the way you would anticipate it to go.

>>3434502
we say that about stocks nigger

forex is a gambling site

>>3434176
get out of biz with your tiny gains, newfag

>>3434533
The point is not about the specific strategy I'm not saying that should be a strategy. The point is that if you did have a strategy that historically shows to buy then this is how much it moves. The point is to debunk the myth that it doesn't move.

>>3434541
No you biz is saying it about forex too
>>3434564
Case in point. See what I mean.

>>3434599
Fuck off grandpa

>>3434626
See what I mean. This myth persists.

File: nzdusd example.png (141KB, 2423x1682px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 2423x1682px

The point is not about any one particular strategy, but about that there is enough movement and leverage to make or lose a lot of money, similarly to crypto.

File: 1499913204574.png (57KB, 88x2133px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 88x2133px

And there are many currency pairs to chose from.