What's the word on Nexus?

People must be praying for it to dip again because lately each thread about it gets ignored and buried. Chart looks like it could blow any second though

>>3419825
Yeah I see nothign here other than that copy paste which means it could be legit.

>>3419600
anyone can actually explain what is it and how is that gonna be useful? from what I'm reading it's another file sharing platform or internet that's gonna be suspended in space? looks really vague

>>3421668
Can anyone actually read and do their own homework?

>>3422844

Reading the whitepaper would put anyone off this nonsensical piece of shit.

You'd be better off telling people not to read it and just making something up.

>>3422874
Then don't buy any. Fine with me. :)

>>3422874
Idk why people think its such shit

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-11 at 10.14.20 am.png (565KB, 1026x802px) Image search: [Google]

565KB, 1026x802px

>>3423368

If you can actually read through that and still want a part of this project then honestly, best of luck.

>>3423408

Wait LMAO they removed the "Decentralise the decentralisation" part.

At least someone had a sense that the abstract had reached peak retard.

File: Screen Shot 2017-09-11 at 10.19.13 am.png (795KB, 1208x1138px) Image search: [Google]

795KB, 1208x1138px

Read this shit.

Just read it.

I'm doing you a favour, here.

Why is that graph there? Why is it completely unexplained?

What sort of hack wrote the sentence "As is seen that blockchains do solve many monetary challenges" and then an unexplained graph that spookily goes down like money goes down!

I mean honestly, buy as much of this shit as you like. Maybe some rube will come along in a month and pay you double for it.

But holy shit this whitepaper is just... nothing.

>>3423466
I'm sorry it's not gonna dip much further at this point. The chart says it's bound to take off again soon, just like it has after every consolidation for the past year. Oh, you're choosing to ignore the chart and focus on grammar use instead? Very savvy investment strategy, sir.

>Also, they show the quantitative easing chart after mentioning how central banking systems are ineffective. Hurr durr context clues

Satellites are smoke and mirrors
>get fukt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFd-ttWUmJ4

>>3423466
>>3423466
Are white papers EVER anything? Most of them is pure bullshit.

>>3423466
Buy the dream, sell the nightmare.

>>3424534
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFd-ttWUmJ4
Lols...how did we get pictures of saturn, etc?

File: Flat-Earth-Memes-207-20.jpg (170KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 960x960px

>>3424847
we don't have any they are all CGI.

>>3424534
>>3424908
>>3424970

>Please panic sell me some cheap coins before it goes to another new floor

>>3424908
I'll be honest, I tracked it down, and the quote is legit, but what exactly does it imply, and why does space 'not being real' have to do with it? You can SEE satellites at night.

File: Flat-earth-meme-melted.jpg (34KB, 300x288px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 300x288px

>>3425001
>don't say I didn't warn you friendo

File: lunarlanding.jpg (70KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 640x640px

>>3425064
It implies geocentricism can't be disproven. No you can see a moving light in the sky. This can be explained in a few different ways. Take the ISS for example it is supposedly 250 miles away about the size of a 747 airplane. That is 1 million feet away. I can barley see a 747 at 30,000 ft away with the naked eye. It is impossible to see something that far away with the naked eye.

File: Flat-Earth-Memes-294-2.png (248KB, 753x404px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 753x404px

Arthur C. Clark a sci-fi author invents satellites in 1956 in 1957 we have our first satellite. Coincidence?

>>3425187
I'm not trolling but are you suggesting space doesn't exist?

File: Screen Shot 2017-04-11 at 6.43.03 PM-2.png (25KB, 575x130px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 575x130px

NASA in hebrew means to deceive. God is real don't let them deceive you with their billions of dollar movie budget.

>>3425118
>>3425118

no you utter moron. Its because geocentrism is faulty it means that we prefer to not do the same mistake as we did for 2k years when thinking about the universe.

File: a8ea9cf53fdd3db951134cf35c3287d9--flat-earth-fringe.jpg (154KB, 668x960px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 668x960px

>>3425311
After hundreds of hours of research. Yes.

File: quote-today-s-scientists-have-substituted-mathematics-for-experiments-and-they-wander-off-through-nikola-tesla-183687.jpg (69KB, 850x400px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 850x400px

>>3425364
>re-read

File: nasa-mason-signs.jpg (47KB, 517x380px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 517x380px

skullduggery /biz/
we have been had.
>tfw when they steal 52 million dollars of your tax money every day.

>>3425446
Pic looks convincing. But how do thinks like satalitte tv work, or images from hurricanes etc? We might have not made it to mooon, but no sateliite?

>>3419600
Total shit, enjoy losing your money to this fedoracoin.

File: launch.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>3425702
Again, this has taken me a couple years of research to come to these conclusions after about 3 months I could see there was not much evidence for the heliocentric model we are all taught to have faith in. Mainstream physicists are the 21st century priests that you must trust to know about heaven but they substituted heaven for "outer space"

>>3424230

If I was marking undergrad essays and someone put that in front of me I would give them a C, or C-.

These are people you want to send your money to.

Go for it, dude, I honestly hope you make gains. I have no ill will.

All I can say is that I read that whitepaper and decided to stay far, far away from Nexus.

File: sofiacooperation2_sn_xl.jpg (136KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 1440x810px

>>3425702
drones, balloons, airplanes, radio towers on every tall building and when driving down the street everywhere now for triangulation. 98% of our communications are actually done through under ocean cables. http://www.newsweek.com/undersea-cables-transport-99-percent-international-communications-319072
>This is actually the hubble telescope here.