>press L to laugh at devs L

This shit was shilled so hard when it reached $1. Glad I didn't cave in.

What happend?

>>3391563
they found a security issue or something

>>3391259
Answer to the FUD, https://blog.iota.org/curl-disclosure-beyond-the-headline-1814048d08ef

>>3391259

its worth speculate buy around 0.00008 IOT/BTC

its currently at 0.00013482 BTC

The devs are suing whoever wrote the article claiming it as libel

Patch fixed over a month ago

Price went down .05 cents and already recovered 50%

Wow its fucking nothing.

>>3391563
>Devs write own hash function for literally no reason
>Ends up having major flaw
>Someone reports on it
>They threaten to sue

They've fixed it now but it's not a good sign when they're so defensive.

>>3391828

>if you fight back, your enemies win

Literally cuck tier advice there anon. Its better to assblast the writer than them being cucked by some article.

These dev's are alpha as fuck

>tfw bought this at 13500 thinking that it already had its correction
Every coin I touch turns to shit. I have been doing this for 3 months and only one of my investments has turned in a profit

Meanwhile I've missed almost every moon mission.

I hate myself

>>3391853
Patience, another opportunity is coming; there is always one in crypto

>>3391852
Whatever, the reality is that they fucked up -- to me, having integrity and admitting it would be a good thing.

IOTA has huge potention. One of the best long time investment.

Walton -> IOTA.

>>3391888

>admit you're wrong, ever

We got a democrat over here

>>3391828
>it's not a good sign when they're so defensive

Especially when their defense was "don't say those things because if you do my portfolio decreases in value."

>>3391962

Are you literally retarded?

They demanded an apology/retraction stating there was monetary damages in the form of decreasing asset value

Are you 12 or just completely incompetent to how the legal system works?