TOP 3 ICO's, a.k.a. how to get a lambo (or two) within 3 months

>>3328400
>not mentioning Kyber

Discarded as shill

>>3328400
>BitDice

Profits off of a percentage of the house edge.

Why would this be successful when there's Edgeless where the whole point is no house edge?

Why did you remove Blackmoon?

Already invested in BitDice but Science is an interesting choice, I need to look into it more

>>3328433
It's almost too late to get the 10% discount. But I just wanted to include Science. Seems very legit but not hyped up.

>>3328431
I don't think edgeless is making any profit really. As far as I know they don't incorporate crypto inherently in the gambling like BitDice does and they don't pay dividends like BitDice does. I think all gambling ICO's are good investments but BitDice seems the best to me.

File: 1503948097654.png (2MB, 1082x1340px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1082x1340px

>>3328433
Anon the real question is why would you include blackmoon?

>>3328613
Black moon is pretty good actually

>>3328416
kyber is only relevant to those who got whitelisted, not worth talking about overall

I have seen cryptobeaks video before and was really curious about Bitdice. Good to see people are keen on this ico too! thanks for the link

Science looks greedy af.
I bet they're going to announce a 100 MIL+ hard cap.

>>3328761
Watch the YouTube video

>>3328693

Why? Tokens are used so you can get a job with them? they pay you no dividends unless you do.

By the way is that anime anon in a telegram group or something ? They usually make good calls.

OP is shilling for a reason stay away from all these icos. 3rd time in a week this guy is shilling this would you please die already.

>>3328907
I asked them
>
Hey. If it's full wallet like mist, the user is required to sync the data to see new transactions. If it's MyEtherWallet there's no sync.

--
Alex Alex from BitDice Casino S.L.R.

>>3328921
I don't need to shill anything, but those previous 2 threads came with some good discussions, I myself invested in Chain and BitDice so want to see with what objections people come up with or whether they agree with me. Why the hate?

>>3328917
i think, she sometimes posts here

last shilling was chainlink, science and enigma i believe

im not sure what she thinks of bitdice, but i think it seems pretty cool, considering etheroll is one of the most profitting ICOs to date, and its still a little market atm

>>3328917
You mean MoonLambos? Yes the group is called Sanity and is one of the groups I am in. Cintix and Moonlambos are the two solidity coders who make smartcontracts for us.

>>3328960
It's a bunch of racists and mysoginists tho, born on the internet

>>3328400
> 1. BitDice
Scam

> 2. Chainlink
>2 man team

> 3. Science
>Give us money so that we can invest it in other ICOs oh and we take 20%

You know, I'm quite surprised at how these companies with 3 people and no working product get tens of millions or more in capital. Just because you bolt a blockchain on to something doesn't make it useful.

>>3328958
Ohhh sorry he meant Waking Korean, ye "she" is very legit and I think her favorite two are actually black moon and science

>>3328998
I agree team's are small and are scaling thanks to the hype on blockchain but hey if I can make money on their product I don't mind "betting" on them. They are greedy and the greedy thing to do is to run the casino, don't think they would scam us. But of course, invest at your own risk and do your own research!

>>3328400
Bitdice is a scam

everyone investing in it deserves what they get

>>3329262
Why do you say that ? Can you elaborate on that claim ?

>>3329262

They already have a working product. If it's a scam it's a very long game

>>3328400
What is your PhD in?

>>3329313
Applied Superconductivity :)

>>3329313
I am an experimental physicist, undergrad from Oxford

I'm interested in participating, but I'm from the US. What are the risks of investing in ICO's from the US? Should I be using a proxy?

>>3329302
>investors are taking all the dosh
>devs aint making shit
>time for an exit scam
>ask for millions in crypto that wont be traced back to them
You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to figure this one out.

>>3329368
Don't mess with the US, remember what happened to Saddam! If there was someone who would be willing to disobey our lord commander SEC, then they would be smart to use a proxy.

>>3329377
Why would you just not send away investors and keep the party running on their own? They are making enough money to be happy, unless they want to scale up no?

>>3328907
you would need to sync to see your dividends and to transfer them, but i would assume that they will be automatically transferred, so whenever it was synced, all up to that point would be available

Daily reminder if somebody really believes in an ICO, they would not be shilling it. OP is most likely somebody on the team scamming people into buying their shitcoin and run away with their money. These assholes are getting creative in that they right a whole a lot of shit making it seem like it's legit with all kinds of videos and useless info. Use your fucking head.

>>3329331
Wait, you got a doctorate in something that doesn't exist? No wonder you're here shilling space tokens.

>>3328960
>Sanity
can you give me the address of the group?

>>3329611
I am sorry ? Are you saying applied superconductivity doesn't exist? Tell that to end millions of people who are taking magnetic resonance scans every day. Or maybe to the large hadron collider, of the next generation fusion reactor. I've never bewn rude in here in any of my threads here before, but you, you can fuck off.

>>3329677
*the **or .. got carried away and didn't check my spelling on my phone

>>3329531
How does that logic work? If I invested in something, then I'd share my opinion with other people no? I did invest in BitDice and chainlink myself, but I am not part of any ICO team.

>>3328456
How so? During the first 48 hours of the distribution period the price is the same as during the pre order.

>>3329734
You are right. I just wanted to share the Science interview video. I think black moon is good, but o haven't invested in it myself yet.

>>3329419
Crypto beak is that you wtf or are u just copying his comments weird

>>3329441
how old are you, 12?

>>3328921
I'll be keeping an eye on bitdice to see whether or not I need to watch out for pajeet threads like this in the future.

>>3329331
KEK
God damn. I almost fell for bitdice too. Fuck you, OP.

>>3329531
>Daily reminder if somebody really believes in an ICO, they would not be shilling it.
This post right here. Anyone that shills an ICO = scam. The more people that buy in, the less profit for those already in it.

>>3330162
Thanks for your opinion. You are wrong in this case. I just have people opportunity to invest in ICOs that I invested in, if they get burnt I get burnt.

>>3330130
Are you very stupid ? Superconductivity could solve worlds energy problem, either by high current conducting undersea cables or by application in fusion reactors. Stop being stupid and educate yourself please.

>>3328693
Its the hyped version of iconomi, i like it. Give blackmoon's hype-making ability to the shy iconomi team and you have a fucking spacerocket

>>3329531
Also it's "write" not "right", are you from the US ?

>>3329630
Email me on [email protected]

>>3329874
you're a moron.

>>3329630
Email me at [email protected]

>>3330927
Can you elaborate please ? I have never properly looked into iconomi, but would like to know the story

>>3329840
Not crypto beak himself unfortunately, but o loved that comment as a reply to be same question and wanted to share it with the world. Should have included mr. beaks copyright

>>3328998
>Bitdice
>scam
Do your fucking research cunt
If they were a scam they would have ran off years ago

>>3331010
Crypto beak aka the big daddy beak boy posts here to ya know

>>3331039
I hope his highness will show me the way

Science is super solid, but the presale buy-in is a bit expensive. I'm not a huge fan of dropping 50k on a presale, but fuck it. At least I'm not a US resident - have fun with that 250k buy-in fuckers.

>>3331139
Have you dropped 250k on science ? :o you could have pooled

>>3328400
Does bitdice accept usa citizens and secondly whats the current price per coin

>>3331221
Not officially ! The price will be determined after all contributions are made as 100M tokens divided betwwen the contributions which at he moment is 10M dollars so at the moment the price per token looks like 10cents

>>3331279
Meh it's against us citizens, I'll just wait for the panic sell.

>>3331139
thats just for USD according to the whitepaper
if you use cryptocurrency there is no minimum...?

am i retarded or am i reading it correct?

Tfw bought musiconomi with $6m cap and you're shilling hundred million dollar icos that will go no where but down

>>3328400
Which exchange will BitDice be listed?

>>3331475

I'm pretty sure it's illegal for tokens owners to announce what/when exchange they'll be on

I wish you the best of luck with your shitcoin, pajeet. And those underwater cables or whatever you were talking about.

>>3331593
They actually said on their slack that they are talking to hitbtc and lite-smth, they don't intend to go on any major exchange

>>3331439
Why do oh think so ?

>>3331747
Thank you :) now fuck off my thread

What's everyone else's opinion ?

>>3328400
I think BitDice makes sense
>https://medium.com/@BitDice/why-is-bitdice-shutting-down-its-current-investor-program-and-running-the-ico-instead-834591fe79f8

I want op to stop shilling bitdice cuz I want Muh tokenssss

>>3332241
But if more people buy then out tokens value is higher, what's the difference

>>3332284
Once bitdice expands into the fiat market I think it will become very profitable against big casinos that don't use the blockchain and when the dividends start coming people will want to get on board, so having more tokens it's better than higher token price in the long run.

>>3331794
>>3332150

wat does this mean?

File: IMG_1687.jpg (172KB, 813x551px) Image search: [Google]

172KB, 813x551px

>not buying the BAT dip

File: 90734693.jpg (466KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1280x720px

Hai hai!~ Just passing by because someone told me I was mentioned.

No, I'm not on Telegram (I am on Discord, but not in Sanity because I felt it's too rowdy; I prefer quieter places).

And regarding what someone was wondering earlier: I'm passing on BitDice. Though I *really* like the idea of a full blown casino, along with the marketing, the platform, the design, etc., I got turned off when someone in the slack about for details about the development team (not a single appearance in the website and the white paper!) and the response was:
>Since we are dealing with a highly regulated gambling industry for which many things are still in a sort of unchartered territory, including the ICO legislation, we decided not to disclose the Team to avoid the potentially harmful legal liabilities.
>According to the Prospectus/Whitepaper, part of the proceeds is meant to fill that gap and allow us to become a fully transparent and regulated entity. What it means is basically that we will introduce Team members as soon as we put all legal things in good order. Up to that moment, our investor community recognizes us based on a long track-record of being a decent player in crypto currency space.
I believe them in this, but I'd rather invest in something where I know who I'm dealing with, you know?

Plus, I have my eye on another gambling-related project that will ICO in the future and I think could do better, even if it's slightly smaller. I won't name it (where the fun be in that!), but I can tell you that you can find it if you search through ICO Alerts.

You'll know it when you see it and research it!