ChainLink ICO - 7th September

Tfw cant afford 100 eth

>7:18 PM - 14 Jun 2016

am I missing something?

>>3321925
ChainLink isn't a shitcoin that just appeared out of nowhere. Vitalik approves of it and one of their paying customers is SWIFT. Do you know who SWIFT is? Moon!

Where's the whitepaper eggman you said there'd be a whitepaper

>>3321940
Patience bizraeli. Whitepaper will be released before ICO. It is being academically reviewed.

What's the benefit of getting in during the ICO? Is it going to be more expensive during the crowsale?
I want to get in into this one but the ICO was hard to get into desu

>>3321961
haha "academically review" my ass. How long do you need for that? they will release it after crowdsale and then every1 gets fckd up by the details. If they cannot deliever now, how will the even fulfill their project idea?
And btw...still no official word about the pre-sale - how much raised - if it is closed ot not.

>>3322990
They have been working on their project since before Ethereum was a thing.

They have literally used their project with SWIFT. These faggots dont need a whitepaper like these other dreamy wishy washy projects you are suckered into buying.

Here is another bit of evidence because you're such a lost case
https://www.factom.com/blog/smartcontract-factom-announce-collaboration

>>3322851
The ICO is the crowdsale, this Tursday. It will sell out very quickly.
The presale ended a few days ago.

>>3323337
Who confirmed that the pre-sale is over? Any official word besides a random message? This Ico feels Like going into a Casino. Pure gamble.

>>3323372
they did

>>3323398
Plane lie. Wether Sergey nor anyone of the devs have an official word. No numbers or facts about the pre-sale. So don't get blinded by your 10x dreams of the shilling /biz/ squad.
But i guess they are busy reviewing the whitepaper for another week.

>>3323441
I was in the slack when they said it. 50% locked for pre sale and 50% for crowdsale... Pre-sale lock happened a few days ago

>>3323452
You don't wanna geht the point. That is No official word how to handle a reached cap of a million dollar pre-sale. Dodgy response in a stealth slack from a Community Manager? And Rory never answered of the pre-sale is done or not.
I hope i can Flip my Investment asap. Gl to you tho.

>>3323503
okay anon. good luck to you

>>3321849
true skelly
real skelly

>>3323441
I didn't fill my pre-sale allocation, but when looking at my site it says not so send any more because the pre-sale is closed. Shut your mouth, you smelly little neckbeard and buy the ICO. Or don't if you want to stay poor.

>>3323677
A random message = official word from CEO / Dev. Really hard to announce sth in the time of Internet and communicate with your Investors. 75IQ confirmed.
Do you even know what Chainlinks Goal is? Or so you got hard shilled by /biz?

B-BUT MUH MONEY SKELLY

Computer programs making decisions based on third party data providers have existed for >30 years. That's literally all a smart contract + oracle is.
Decentraliztion + centralized oracle literally removes all benefits of decentralization.
This is such a shitshow.

>>3324014
can a regular 'computer program' allocate funds trustlessly, immutably and transparently based on the same external data source?

didnt think so you fuckwit

>>3323452
>I was in the slack when they said it
This right here is why this project is shit.
You can't give out public information about your project on Slack, last I heard it's full of pajeets and biztards. They need to give the information on an official Twitter or something not Slack.

>>3323441
Also this
>No numbers or facts about the pre-sale
Was it so hard for them to announce "ok we will do 50% for presale and 50% for public sale"?
But no, you had to send a message on slack to get some basic answers.

I feel like this is a side project for them, no communication with the contributors whatsoever unless you ask them directly.

>>3321849
Coincidence? Airdrop update from Omisgo is from 4 September till 11 September.

>>3324123
You need to TRUST the oracle (not trustless).
Oracles have full control over their inner workings and nothing 100% stops them from editing their ouput (not immutable).
No company shares 100% of their inner workings with the world (not transparent).
True && false == false, smart contract && oracle == !trustless.
QED, BTFO.

>>3324549
yeah no shit you need to trust the oracle

reduced trust > full trust

or is that distinction lost on an idiot like you?

Btw pre-sale still not over, no official word from the community manager. To all the shilling /biz/ anons, who believe in random rumours.

how do i get in on the ICO do i have to be whitelisted? I only see an option for the pre sale.

We do not want to miss out on this bad boy.

where to buy?
need 100k

>>3323708

Are you literally retarded? If you get into the pre-sale you get an address and an according site which tells you how much of your allocation you have filled. And that site updated with the message that the pre-sale is closed. Holy fuck, I know you are just trying to spread FUD so you can get into the ICO more easily but spreading FUD literally does the opposite of what you are intending it to when you come across as a fucking retard.

I literally just asked two slack team members if I am fucked because some idiot spilled over our cap. They said the team has not decided how they will handle this yet. So how the fuck can you claim to know?

>>3325353
>how the fuck can you claim to know
I'm not seeing where OP said anything about that at all so you just seem like you're lashing out at the wrong person to vent your frustration.

File: Screenshot_20170903-161018_01.png (149KB, 1051x1073px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1051x1073px

>>3325333
>>3325333
And you speak about retarded :)
Don't throw around with words, when you srly got zero clue.
Just look at the pic and be quiet. I am already heavily invested and regretting it, because they are unable to communicate the smallest things.

NO OFFICIAL WORD YET. One of the worst communication an Ico Haftung so far.

But go believe whatever u wanna believe.

File: LINK.png (70KB, 610x493px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 610x493px

>>3325420

sigh....

>>3325441
Did you share the link around? Its possible they cracked down on the people that didn't follow the email instructions to keep it private.

>>3325441
This is could be anything from a manual updated message because the Limit was exceeding too much, to automated generated messages.

All i want is communication. Point. An official word from a Dev or the CEO directly.
But ok. You don't wanna geht the Point. Let's just hope vor the best Like everyone and flip as soon as possible.

>>3325462

Nope, I'm just a poorfag who couldn't fill his allocation. I sent there from 2 addresses though, but I asked first to see if it's alright. Devs said they have no problem with it.

>>3325420
So the presale is still ongoing? Everyone thought it was over for the past 4-5 days.
Nice communication guys, I don't think they could've done worse!

>>3325658
Nobody knows. That's my whole point. No official word from a dev, CEO or community manager so far. Only this random message, which can mean anything.

it seems like the project is too good to be true, why not just use ripple? why was there a need for a new coin? can some smart anon break down the difference between this and ripple? why is chain link important?

>>3325996
It's not limited to just banks. You can run an oracle node for any data you want to feed into the blockchain and make money off it if your data is accurate, from navigation coordinates to hotel room availability to home mortgage rates.

>>3326298
this is what im talking about, doesnt that sound too incredible? like its too good to be true? im gonna wait till it hits the exchanges and try to pick it up when its low. its gonna be like .5 for every LINK right?

>>3326957
no not too incredible. If you can run an oracle through bank data already, why not other sources of data?

>>3326957
you will not be able to pick up low on the exchanges. 2x ICO minimum & thats if you scoop up right away on ED