There was a popular thread (twice now) about good ICOs to invest in. One of the proposed ICOs was BitDice.
BitDice info:
ICO Website:
https://ico.bitdice.me/en/
Bitcointalk:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2046450.20
Youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pf3VuhtzUlY
Original thread: >>3246992
What are your thoughts on BitDice?
Now, imo this looks like a solid investment.
The only thing that bothers me is that there is no info on the team. This is what the team said on slack:
"Since we are dealing with a highly regulated gambling industry for which many things are still in a sort of unchartered territory, including the ICO legislation, we decided not to disclose the Team to avoid the potentially harmful legal liabilities."
>>3313309
It's a scam I know the guy running it. He wants to use 1/10 of the money to make a shitty page and then run away with the rest. Look, there isn't even a real name on the ICO page, this is for a reason.
It seems fucking amazing. It's at 10m right now which is a ridiculous market cap for a casino token. Only issue I see with this is the anonymous dev team.
>>3313309
> devs don't put their names
> dividents too high to be real
Exit scam?
Concerns of a possible scam seem justified.
>>3313367
Maybe but they have a functioning website already and the whitepaper seems nice
It's a scam and anyone who invests in this deserves what's coming to them.
Imagine if some fuckwad told his investors to send him money on a website and told them to not worry about the fact that no one knows who he is.
Fucking absurd.
>>3313309
Stay away from anything that has to do with casinos, gambling, or social media. If you're going to invest in an ICO, do something that involves a useful service like distributed storage or computing. And even then, do research on the companies.