>>3308138
why? I was onboard from the beginning
WE
So uh.... did anyone see this?
https://cointelegraph.com/news/digital-dollars-and-digital-pounds-citi-executive-believes-digitized-fiat-currency-is-key-to-blockchain-adoption
>>3308178
Woah --- and the faggot article completely disregards me ntioning other shitcoins probably cointele isint being "bought" guess you could say. DGB is in for one hell of a fucking ride p
>>3308947
That's is why I bought in at 142 sats and held this entire time.
>>3309125
>>3308178
>According to McKenney, the bank has also pursued other projects aside from exploring other possible collaboration opportunities for its CitiConnect platform. Among these projects are the investments made in several Blockchain startups, namely, Chain, Digital Asset Holdings, and Axoni.
>All the companies offer Blockchain solutions that don’t include a native digital currency.
>She also added that the bank is currently not interested in advancing projects to explore a virtual currency outside of state-backed digital currency, it remains open for that possibility in the future.
interesting read, but not hyper bullish for a DGB partnership with Citi.
I think PwC would have a greater interest in DGB in any case.