Teach me biz how do i spot fud and shills i keep falling for it

File: 1498101678676.png (313KB, 560x897px)

313KB, 560x897px

The most fudded coins are the ones being accumulated. Hope you stocked up on digibytes

>>3236603
Trolling is obvious tho

>>3236687
>he thinks solid advice is trolling

See what /biz/ shills, cross reference with Twitter crypto OGs, cross reference with leddit subs, cross reference with websites and whitepapers.

>>3236851
This guy fucks, but in the end it's all about looking at the order books and spotting those fat sell walls.

>>3236581
You should also try and understand why that picture is bullshit

>>3236581

Both usually tell you either no information at all or is focussing on single factors and overestimates/underestimates them.

Actually, DGB is a good example for both.
While at 2000ish levels, it was "the presentation will be gud" over and over while missing the point that this was not a healthy growth and the price could not be sustained for long. During this time, people blew up minor news like an australian outdoor-mobile shop (a niche market in a small country) now accepting DGB as a payment method. Or the fact that some eastern europe guy integrated DGB in a minecraft-server - overrated and not relevant for the price.
It was clearly shilling, yet people bought it.

The FUD on DGB on the other hand also got out of hand in the past month. Daily, a dozen of the "this is the face of a cult member" threads sprang up and the haters who lost money on it came to hate the coin alltogether, because it became a meme. This anon >>3228331 even shat out that their placement in a list which is ordered by an ALPHABETICAL order hints some information about their placement in the citi-contest.
This is clearly FUD, yet people still bought it (or sold it, to speak in a more direct way).

So while >>3236603 is a bit plain in his explanation, it is in part correct that heavy FUD might give you a hint which coin might find a floor in the near future where whales are willing to accumulate a bit until the next wave of information triggers a rise in price.

>>3236931
first good advice i read around here thanks anon