ICO assessment

File: 1502334951053.jpg (88KB, 846x960px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 846x960px

Pls to answer.

File: 1343995676010.jpg (31KB, 426x331px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 426x331px

pls

I'm really new to ICOs and need to learn the ropes.

>>3202489
"We can’t comment on exchanges. If RvT will be trading in any exchange, it will be because of community interest. We look forward to supporting a vibrant and growing community that will use RvT as part of delivering built-in security.

Rivetz' Tokens are utility tokens and are not investments. They are used for executing hardware embedded cyber security which is a new paradigm for how to architect an IT security solution. At some point and without Rivetz' involvement, a secondary market will likely be created and the exchanges will pickup the RVT. At that time you will be able to trade your RVT for other currencies or sell them however Rivetz does not support the secondary market. You are purchasing a token that is used for the operation of high level security on devices of any nature. We realize that many of you are buying RVT for their value and not for their utility however we can not comment on when the secondary market may be created and/or when you will be able to sell these tokens."

red flag

File: xtd.png (134KB, 736x402px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 736x402px

>>3202867
Well, on the one hand that's a good sign to me. Utility over speculative value.

This is the polar opposite of shit like XTD that has literally zero utility and only wants to hit as many exchanges as quickly as possible for a quick cash grab.
Pic related.
>"the code is like any other crypto"
>"we just want to be popular"

>>3202867
>>3202990
Or am I reading this wrong?

>>3202990
There's nothing wrong with it having utility over value, but personally that is not in my immediate interest