The following pairs will be delisted with all outstanding orders being canceled
XBT/GBP
ETH/GBP
XRP/CAD
XRP/JPY
EOS/EUR
EOS/USD
XLM/EUR
XLM/USD
GNO/EUR
GNO/USD
REP/USD
This is the end of Kraken
>>3171344
No this is them actually working on a temporary solution instead of polocuck.
>>3171344
Shitcoins and GBP pairs. I'm happy, kraken feels so much more responsive.
>>3171344
As a britbong I'm pissed
>>3171344
>XLM/EUR
this hurts the pepe.
>>3171674
this makes me happy
>>3171674
Krexit scam perhaps
>>3171344
XRP/CAD
Whhhhyyyyyy... That was my only chance to protect my gains from weed man's tax goons.
Might be a complete idiot but doesnt kraken already not allow GBP deposits?, i have to transfer it through euros first, am i missing something here?
>>3171885
I don't follow, Kraken still has your info
...and it crashed again regardless.
>>3171930
By having that conversion option, I could have sold my xrp to CAD and have kraken wire transfer me that amount. It takes less fees and reduces chances of getting auditing by CRA. If the CRA even smells Btc than thats an immediate flag.
No way to avoid tax for sure but chances to do so does exist.
>>3172088
Fellow Canadian here, so your saying any withdraw from BTC is a guaranteed audit? What happens if you get audited?
Second question, i have my CoinSquare and QuadrigaCX accounts under my fathers name, but if i withdraw into my bank account with the government immediately audit me? BTW i funded my BTC through my brothers account, am i fucked..
Thanks
>>3171674
TBF trading volume of gbp on kraken was awful. Your much better just trading in USD or EUR.
They're not just delisting coin pairs, they're taking most of the useful trade types away:
Stop Loss
Take Profit
Stop Loss, Take Profit
Stop Loss, Take Profit Limit
Stop Loss Limit
Take Profit Limit
Trailing Stop
Trailing Stop Limit
Stop, Limit
so, basically... everything. What's funny is that I guarantee they could fix their problems if they threw enough money at them, but they would rather cut service instead. Cheap, cheap, cheap.
>>3172174
Why not just sell privately or on LBC? Sell for cash or etransfers.
>>3172303
If you read the notice, they apparently are throwing money at it, but while the money settles to the ground and grows into additional servers they're trying to keep up with demand by temporarily limiting the least-utilized and the most resource-heavy services respectively.
Binance taking over