What do you think about this? Anon messanging is very much needed, wwam is an anon protocol, with the potential to build apps based on it
Interesting! Very much needed, indeed.
>>3137716
wham
>>3137716
Dude, obsidian already has this. Another ico which has way more hype than this crap.
>>3137716
Worthless shitcoin.
We don't need "DUDE BLOCKCHAIN LMAO" for anonymous messaging. Centralized servers don't matter when end-to-end encryption exists. Even if you do want to go the p2p route you definitely don't need to make your own token, premine it, and sell it in an ICO.
This is a complete and utter sham. Sad part is you retards will still throw money at them because "MOONING! GAINS! LAMBO LMAO!"
You're all a bunch of brain dead retards.