reminder that bitcore has polar opposite principles to original

>>3102364
Like?

>>3102364
You're getting desperate now, aren't you.

>>3102440
Jacking up fees and keeping the blocks so small so people will have to use government-controllable side chains.


Censoring discussions which go against this.


Etc

>>3102488
I admit, rising fees are an issue

File: oDU7Vb1.jpg (23KB, 440x280px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 440x280px

Hi. We're here to talk to you about Satoshis vision, do you have a few moments?

>>3102556
No thanks I have my bitcore kike coin :)

>>3102556
keked hard

File: ramsesyul.png (394KB, 870x478px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 870x478px

>>3102364
Does it matter?

File: hahayes.jpg (25KB, 344x500px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 344x500px

>>3102713

>>3102713
Kinda does:

- Rising costs

- Controlled side chains

Makes BTC not decentralized anymore, Tbh I'm kind of rooting for BCC since I would not like BTC to become centralized.

>>3102556
>implying satoshi isn't responsible
he could've been like Vitalik and die slowly with his coin fading into obscurity

>>3102941
This is pretty shit but in terms of trading and prices I doubt it's gonna change anything.