Spotted on plebbit: >The 0x protocol was deployed a few hours

I just want to know where I'll be able to buy it as quickly as possible tomorrow. Missed out on registration

>>3068788
same

>>3068772
Yep, this is game changing. I was just thinking we needed something like this yesterday when I saw a bunch of people trying to buy directly from people who registered.

Going all in on this one.

>>3068772
Liquidated a bit of my ark gains and a few other alts, put a bit of savings in as well. Going to max out my contribution. Time to buy a damn house.

>>3068772
I'm going to regret this if I don't wire another $1k aren't i?
Fucking hell

File: 1496252034758.jpg (78KB, 492x559px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 492x559px

I can't believe you idiots missed the registration. I tried to post about it 12 hours before it ended but you fell for the fud.

>>3068871
I didn't miss it. My phone just doesn't support Civic, so I gave up :^(

>>3068772
>>3068788
>>3068800
>>3068806
>>3068819
>>3068843
>>3068871
Holy shit go back to your slack, Jesus.

Fucking shills

>>3068871
Pretty sure I saw the thread and I'm pretty sure you didn't mention what the thing actually does

If I'd known that it made buying tokens easier I'd be on that in a heartbeat

>>3068920
LOL, you need a mommy to hold your hand while DYORing, stupid kiddo? No wonder u are a broke faggot

>>3068888
enjoy missing out this moonrocket if you cant spot the difference between real epic tech and shill

>>3068920
Why the fuck would that be my responsibility. I've literally made thousands of bucks just researching shitposts on biz. Don't expect to get spoon-fed and actually open a whitepaper.pdf for once

>>3069009
Do you usually buy something based on the whitepaper just seeming like a good idea? Anyone can make a scam whitepaper that looks great but with no plans to actually follow through on the plan laid out by the whitepaper. Do you take any measures to avoid such scams?

>>3069103
I research the team behind it. Usually ends up being more important than the idea itself.

>>3068888

Quads called it.

Kek says shills.

>>3069110
As in googling their names, looking them up on linkedin, etc? Do you ever buy into coins that don't list names/identities of the devs?

>>3069159
not him but you can literally see on the whitepaper that it's a great idea and that they locked their tokens in for 4 years so they cant just pump and dump us

>>3069159
(and the coinbase advisors)

>>3069243
>>3069254
I'm not referring to 0x specifically but new cryptos in general. Even if the whitepaper looks like a great idea, it might be scamming faggots that won't/can't implement the idea.

>>3069309
0x already has a working prototype implementation on their site

>>3069346
I think 0x is a good coin, I just want thoughts on how to gauge other coins going forward.

>>3069360
ICOs have been happening for a while, people are getting more skeptical but also hungrier for something real. Moving forward, look for proof of concepts or a history of prior works by the team.

File: 1498167685813.jpg (272KB, 812x399px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 812x399px

Would it be wise to max out my ICO contribution?

I cant really lose - right?

>>3069370
What would be examples of valid proof-of-concepts? Test networks?

>>3069417
maybe he means like with district0x they already had decentralized districts up