WE

ARE

should have bought IOTA.

DIGILATRINES

>>3057561
WUZ

File: 1497038814598.jpg (71KB, 620x466px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 620x466px

welcome to the digifag world

>>3058132
Did this slide really show up during a dgb presentation?

>>3058132
Did he really get btcs by taking this picture?

>>3058132
stop posting that

>>3058162
no, didnt even get anything

File: Screenshot_20170801-071330.jpg (322KB, 1066x801px) Image search: [Google]

322KB, 1066x801px

>>3058132
>Tfw I bet the retard who did this is still lurking on here constantly haunted by the regrettable image of his now infamous hairy ass

what the fuck is going on here

>>3058209
haha funny, kys

>>3058181
>>3058227
It's your ass, isn't it?

>>3058257
no :^)

Seems like honestly bittrex just flips a switch to either moon or tank coins. i just don't get how dgb could have fallen below 300? i have been trying to put logic into a chaotic system that is crypto trading. it's like they are allowing the next generation of marines to buy in. i feel cheated being with them from the start :(

>>3058227
Found the sharpie shover

>>3058272
You must be new to this.

>>3058272
You don't get how it could have fallen so far down?
I'll explain it as simply as I can
For the longest while DGB's price was between 50 and 150 sat. Because that is how much the market determined it was worth.
Then the minecraft thing was announced which drove the price up. Then the citibank qhich further drove it up. Between that and the idea of DGB targeting a "gaming niche", the hype for it shot up to unsustainable levels, along with the price.
When the citibank thing turned out to be a flop, followed by minecraft, followed by the realization that, in reality, people were paying 2000 sats for the EXACT SAME 50 sat shitcoin, the market began to correct itself and go back down to the price that it belongs at.