Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: LRLvqKr.png (78KB, 500x500px) Image search:
[Google]
78KB, 500x500px
Why haven't you bought Funfair yet? It's on-track to being the first to solving many problems of blockchain casinos, I'll post some of the important tidbits from the whitepaper from their site: funfair.io/platform/
>5.1 Current Competition is Unsustainable
We have been actively tracking gas costs across multiple Ethereum blockchain-based casinos presently
operating. Transaction costs to play a single hand of blackjack can exceed $1.00 and dice games can
exceed $.75 per bet on average.
A typical preferred individual bet stake is in the $1-$10 range — this is how the majority of real-money
bets are staked globally. At these sizes, transactions fees can overwhelm the size of the bet.
Even when a player wishes to make larger bets in the $20 range, the transaction costs can still
overwhelm the house edge — in total an average 12% cost between house edge and fees. For this
reason, only players willing to stake amounts greater than $50 generally play these games. Lowering
gas costs is only a temporary solution because as ETH prices rise, fee costs will make bets such as this
uneconomical once more.
>6 Serverless Operations
FunFair has been engineered to be as attractive to online gaming operators as it is to players, eliminating
server racks and stifling overhead costs of the traditional online gaming systems (that can run into
millions of dollars to deploy). Our existing technology allows licensees much lower overhead costs for
running a casino.
By the time FunFair launches its v4 Fate Channel implementation the system will be entirely serverless.
A completely serverless, employeeless peer-to-peer casino is vastly more resilient and significantly
cheaper to operate than one which must deal with banking institutions, data center hosting costs and payroll management. We firmly believe our technology will be transformative for the online gaming industry.
Bonus protips:
>Only ~620 sats, guaranteed in the x000s long-term
>CEO helped make the Super FX chip used in Starfox
>>
I bought this last time you shilled it and it fucking tanked. Heavy heavy bags.
>>
>>3008375
The only time you could have copped a tanking on this is when it was added to Bittrex and went to around 1500 sats, your fault for buying a newly added coin on an exchange within the first 24 hours of it being added. Remember what happened to Etheroll? If you're still bagholding this just check back in September-October after the Dutch auction.
>>
>>3008398
Il hold for some small gains but it will never moon like neo
>>
I bought this at 1100 sat like a month ago, still bagholding. hell i'll probably end up gambling it once its actually released
>>
Bought at 941 after it was added on Bittrex, so been bag holding for a while now.
That said I have been confident on the product and team, so wasnt stressed. The last 2 weeks the price has been going up nicely so I expect to be back in profit soon.
Really undervalued at the moment and if I had some extra cash I would have bought more.
>>
File: 1480037844355.jpg (611KB, 651x972px) Image search:
[Google]
611KB, 651x972px
IT'S
MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONING
>>
>>3008797
Polls say it has a 98% chance of being the next best crypto
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2