BTC vs BCC

>>2902169
>http://www.strawpoll.me/13555513

Is this really a question... a established structure. Actual places that use BTC or some fork that will need months if not years of adoption (if ever).

BCC is obviously made from greedy chinky

File: sands.jpg (30KB, 461x427px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 461x427px

ive got £4k sitting on Kraken just hoping BTC will drop like a rock even if for a few days or so, BCC will crash and burn, Jackie Chan and co will inflate the prices for abit then cashout but that will be it.

Stop calling it a fork, it's just another copypaste shitcoin.
Only difference this time is they're not copypasting only the source code, but also the existing blockchain.
There's not reason this should affect BTC any more than all the other thousands of shitcoins released over the years.

>>2902972
Pics

I find BCC and this whole circus repulsive.
There is absolutely no way to hinder updates to BTC, this hard fork is only happening because chinky yellow subhumans who destroy the planet with their electricity-wasting mining farms would get fucked and have to look for real jobs if BTC got all the updates it needed.

This is all caused by a few disgusting vermin who deserve the most painful excruciating death possible, holding back an entire currency just because "M-MUH MINING ALGORITHMS"
Fuck
The Chinese are just inferior beings that should die