What did (((they))) mean by this?

>>2895661
I find this bcc-btc shit confusing. Should I just turn all my bitcoins into LTC ?

coinbase is taking the BCC that belongs to you.

Maybe because they don't want to support BCC.
Maybe because they want to dump it all and make some cash. Or, use a large position to manipulate price.

how the fuck can they even use BCC name?

fucking thieves. that shit belongs to bitcoinconnect.

>>2895661
CoinJar.com is doing it too. I think at least half will not support BCC

Isn't this a good thing? Would we not rather have one BTC that is mainly used? I may not be understanding this correctly though.

>>2895687
Hope they dump it all on the chinks and kill this meme

>>2895714
Jup, it's actually BCH, but doesn't matter really, cuz there will be no fork.

>>2895728
You are correct. We want BCC to die as quickly as possible. By not supporting it in the first place, Coinbase is helping its demise.

>>2895784
So essentially, if BCC is able to die quickly, this should hypothetically keep BTC from crashing?

>>2895786
Correct. BCC could potentially halve BTC's value.

>>2895809
20b cap for a coin with no devs and centralized miners?